Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700133
Original file (199700133.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
                                    CASE NO: AD97-00133

PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1. Type of discharge (or characterization of service): GD

2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 920821

3. Authority for separation:

         a. Regulation: Chapter 14, AR 635-200

         b. Reason:       Misconduct - Drug Abuse

4. Prior review(s): ( X ) NONE



PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

1.       Service data: 2. Awards and decorations:


a. Period entered for: 2 Years Type
b. Entry date: 901116 SWASMw/3BSS
c. Age: 22 Years DOB: 680819 OSR
d. Educational level: HS Grad
e. Aptitude area scores: ( X ) NIF/NA
         GT: 103 3. Highest grade achieved:
f. Actual creditable service: 1 Year
9 Months 6 Days
Grade
E4

4. Performance evaluations:
( X ) NONE


                                             CASE NO: AD97-00133

PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5. Periods of unauthorized absence: ( X ) NONE


6. Nonjudicial punishment:

         Nature Date
         Art 15 920812

7. Court-Martial data: ( X ) NONE
        

8.       Remarks: ( X ) NONE


SECTION B - Other Service Data

1. Other discharge(s):

         Service Type
RA HD







         CASE NO: AD97-00133

PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A - Analyst's Assessment

1. Summary of facts and circumstances concerning discharge:


920813: Unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation
action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, for misconduct-
drug abuse. He was advised of his rights.
920813: Separation authority waived rehabilitation and approved separation
with a general discharge.
920821: Applicant was discharged.
        

2. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity on DD Form 293 or incorporated by reference:
         See attached DD Form 293.

3. Exhibit(s) submitted:

         A-1: DD Form 293, dated 961024.





PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION B - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
( X ) NONE

PART V - SUMMARY OF REVIEW HEARING


         a. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No

        
         b. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
        

2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing: ( X ) NONE


                                    CASE NO: AD97-00133

PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
         ( X )   Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A, Paragraph 2.
         ( )     Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as follows:
         ( )     Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as follows:

        

b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( X ) Change of Reason


2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity:

         a. Propriety:    The applicant has not submitted an issue of propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of propriety to change the discharge.

         b. Equity:       The parenthetical numbers below corresponds to the issue numbers on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI, Paragraph 1, above.

(1) The issue is accepted. Regulations currently in effect list the narrative reason for the applicant's discharge as misconduct. The Board voted to change the narrative reason on the applicant’s DD Form 214 to misconduct. The Board was satisfied that the characterization of service was proper and equitable, and it voted not to change it.

3. Response to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): ( X ) NA


                           CASE NO: AD97-00133

PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.       Board conclusion(s):

         The discharge was:

         ( X )    Proper.
         ( )      Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to
                                     .
         ( )      Improper as to reason. Change reason to
                        under                       .
         ( )      Equitable.
         ( )      Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to
                               .
         ( X )    Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to
 MISCONDUCT             
                  under
 AR635-200                                .
         ( )      Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to
                     under                          .


2. Voting record: Change No Change
         Reason 5 0
Characterization 0 5

         The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right corner of this document.

Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: CPCD
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508



3. Minority views: ( X ) NA


                                    CASE NO: AD97-00133

PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified       


                                 
COL ALLEN
Post Hearing Reviewer   


PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE

TO: Commander, ARPERCEN Date:

The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant named in Part I directs that:

( )     Characterization of discharge be changed to Uncharacterized.
( )     Characterization of discharge be changed to Honorable.
( )     Characterization of discharge be changed to Under Honorable Conditions.
( X )   Reason and authority for discharge be changed to
       
Misconduct under AR 635-200 .
( )     Other (see remarks below).

Remarks: ADRB directs Cdr, ARPERCEN to issue a revised DD Form 214, to reflect the reason change to the applicant.



SECTION B - CERTIFICATION


Approval Authority:

EL CARTIO BARNES
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board

Official:




SHERRY HILL SARGENT
Major, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge          C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

AD9700133 970321 GD 920821 AR635-200 C14 A6770 MD 5-0 A
1 10 11 12 18 20 26 41 46 49 52

A9442 A0100 A9217
53 58 63


                           CASE NO: AD97-00133

PART IX - VOTING RECORD

Name  Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC UNCHAR

1. MAJ WYRICK, JIMMY Mbr
 X             X    

2. LTC PHILLIPS, JOHN Mbr
 X             X    

3. LTC SMITH, LILLIAN Mbr
 X             X    

4. COL ALLEN, THOMAS Mbr
 X             X    

5. COL MATHEWS, WILLIAM PO
 X             X    








Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700408

    Original file (199700408.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board was satisfied that the characterization of service was proper and equitable, and to change it would be inappropriate. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified COL MELCHIOR Post Hearing Reviewer PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE TO: Commander, ARPERCEN Date: The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700285

    Original file (199700285.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Voting record: ChangeNo Change Reason 5 0 Characterization 0 5 The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified COL MELCHIOR Post Hearing Reviewer PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE TO: Commander, ARPERCEN Date: The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700708

    Original file (199700708.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. ( ) Characterization of discharge be changed to Honorable. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199701373

    Original file (199701373.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Type of discharge (or characterization of service): GD 2. CASE NO: AD97-01373 PART III - SERVICE HISTORYSECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued 5. CASE NO: AD97-01373 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700101

    Original file (199700101.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    910207: Applicant was discharged. CASE NO: AD97-00101 PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified COL ALLEN Post Hearing Reviewer PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE TO: Commander, ARPERCEN Date: The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant named...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700672

    Original file (199700672.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    920612: Applicant was discharged. The Board was satisfied that the characterization of service was proper and equitable, and to change it would be inappropriate. CASE NO: AD97-00672 PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified COL MELCHIOR Post Hearing Reviewer PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE TO: Commander, ARPERCEN Date: The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of Section 30, Public...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700249

    Original file (199700249.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    850403: Applicant was discharged.2. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A, Paragraph 2. CASE NO: AD97-00249 PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified LTC PHILLIPS Post Hearing Reviewer PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE TO: Commander, ARPERCEN Date: The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of Section 30, Public...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700448

    Original file (199700448.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    CASE NO: AD97-00448 PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified COL ALLEN Post Hearing Reviewer PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE TO: Commander, ARPERCEN Date: The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant named in Part I directs that: ( ) Reason...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700495

    Original file (199700495.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Type of discharge (or characterization of service): GD 2. 921008: Applicant was discharged. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified COL MELCHIOR Post Hearing Reviewer PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE TO: Commander, ARPERCEN Date: The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as Title 10, United States Code, Section...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700702

    Original file (199700702.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, on his DD Form 214, the reason for discharge was improperly changed to misconduct - abuse of illegal drugs, by an authority involved in the discharge process. Change reason to Misconduct under ( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to under .2. CASE NO: AD97-00702 PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified LTC WHISKER Post...