IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 28 July 2015
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150010483
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition.
2. The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and
30 April 2012 and whose MH diagnosis was changed during that process.
3. The applicant submitted an application through the Department of Defense (DOD) Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system.
2. The DOD memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of MH diagnoses for service members completing a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 in order to determine if service members were disadvantaged by a changed diagnosis over the course of their physical disability process.
3. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the PDBR SRP and the applicant was provided a copy.
4. The applicant did not respond to the advisory opinion.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. After a comprehensive review of the applicants case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there be no change of the applicants disability and separation determination.
2. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the Disability Evaluation System (DES). The evidence of the available records show the diagnosis of insomnia was rendered during the DES process. The SRP agreed there were no inappropriate changes in diagnosis, and therefore determined that no MH diagnosis was changed to the applicants possible disadvantage in the disability evaluation process. Therefore, the applicant did not meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Project. The SRP acknowledged the the Department of Veterans Affairs Compensation and Pension exam diagnoses of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression but pre-separation evidence was lacking.
3. The SRP next considered whether any mental condition, regardless of diagnosis, was unfitting for continued military service. The SRPs threshold for recommending a not-unfit determination required a preponderance of evidence. The SRP agreed that evidence of the record reflected minimal occupational impairment on the basis of MH related symptoms. The commanders statement did not implicate a MH condition as a cause of duty impairment. At no time during the applicants military service did he require psychiatric hospitalization or emergency care. No MH condition was permanently profiled or judged to fail retention standards. There was no indication from the record a MH condition significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance. The SRP therefore concluded that there was insufficient evidence that any MH condition rose to the level of being unfitting at the time of separation.
4. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a determination of unfit for any MH condition and no disability rating was recommended.
5. The available evidence shows the SRPs assessment should be accepted.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____x___ ____x___ ___x_____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
____________x___________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20040003532
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20150010483
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150007321
The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicants submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the Disability Evaluation System (DES) Pilot Program. The SRP next considered whether any MH condition, regardless of diagnosis, was unfitting for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150012620
The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The applicant submitted an application through the Department of Defense (DOD) Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) Mental Health Special Review Panel (SRP). After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a determination of unfit for an MH condition and no disability rating...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005649
The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicants submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System (DES). After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004396
The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation system (DES). After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006633
The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicants submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the military...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150010713
The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change to the applicant's disability and separation determination. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010919
The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicants submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP also determined that no MH diagnoses were changed to the applicant's possible disadvantage in the disability evaluation process. The evidence did not support a change in the diagnosis.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150007553
The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicants submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the Pilot Disability Evaluation System (DES). After consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that there was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011599
The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicants submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the applicant's MH diagnoses, the physical evaluation board (PEB) fitness determination; and if unfitting, a disability rating recommendation in accordance with the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008197
The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the MH diagnoses; the physical evaluation board (PEB) fitness determination; and if unfitting, whether a disability rating recommendation in accordance with the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) Section 4.130 was made. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes...