BOARD DATE: 21 May 2014
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140006633
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition.
2. The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and
30 April 2012 and whose mental health diagnosis was changed during that process.
3. The applicant submitted an application through the DOD Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) Mental Health Special Review Panel (SRP).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicants submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system.
2. The Department of Defense memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of mental health diagnoses for service members completing a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 in order to determine if service members were disadvantaged by a changed diagnosis over the course of their physical disability process.
3. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the PDBR SRP and the applicant was provided a copy.
4. The applicant did not respond to the advisory opinion.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. After a comprehensive review of the applicants case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there be no change of the applicants disability and separation determination.
2. The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the MH diagnoses, the physical evaluation board (PEB) fitness determination and, if unfitting, whether the provisions of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VASRD) Section 4.129 were applicable, and a disability rating recommendation in accordance with VASRD Section 4.130 was made.
3. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System (DES). The evidence of the available records shows that diagnosis of adjustment disorder was rendered. During processing through the military DES, no change in this diagnosis was made at any time. The SRP verified that no MH diagnoses were changed to the applicant's possible disadvantage in the disability evaluation. Therefore, the applicant did not meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Project.
4. The SRP considered whether a mental condition was unfitting for continued military service. The SRP's charge with respect to the MH conditions referred for review that were determined to be not unfitting by the PEB was an assessment of the appropriateness of the PEB's fitness adjudication. The SRP's threshold for countering PEB not-unfit determinations required a preponderance of evidence. In this case, the PEB adjudicated the adjustment disorder as a condition not constituting a physical disability in accordance with Department of Defense Instruction 1332.38. Even conceding the issue of whether the condition was ratable, the SRP agreed that the preponderance of evidence of the record reflected non-limiting symptoms in the period of time leading into the medical evaluation board (MEB).
5. The SRP noted that at no time during the applicant's military service did he require a psychiatric hospitalization or emergency care. The MH condition was not profiled and was not judged to fail retention standards. The SRP agreed that the evidence of the record reflected minimal occupational and social impairment in the period of time leading into the MEB.
6. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded the mental condition was not unfitting at the time of separation and not subject to service disability rating.
7. The available evidence shows the SRPs assessment should be accepted.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X__ ____X____ _____X___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_________X______________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20040003532
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140006633
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008197
The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the MH diagnoses; the physical evaluation board (PEB) fitness determination; and if unfitting, whether a disability rating recommendation in accordance with the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) Section 4.130 was made. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010475
The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the mental health condition during processing through the military disability evaluation system. The SRPs charge with respect to the MH conditions referred for review that were determined to be not unfitting by the physical evaluation board (PEB) was an assessment of the appropriateness of the PEBs fitness adjudication. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010916
The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System (DES). After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded the MH condition was not unfitting at the time of medical retirement and no mental health diagnosis was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001429
The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicants submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP noted the applicants case was referred for review regarding whether there was a change in the applicant's MH diagnosis during the military disability...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007370
The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicants submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP determined the applicants MH condition to be not unfitting by the PEB.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013803
The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The SRP considered whether the applicant's MH condition was unfitting for continued military service. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded the MH condition was not unfitting at the time of medical retirement and no MH diagnosis was subject to additional disability rating.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010492
The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the MH diagnoses, and the physical evaluation board (PEB) fitness determination. To consider if this diagnostic variance represented a possible disadvantage to the applicant during the Integrated Disability Evaluation System (IDES) process, the SRP first considered if the preponderance of the evidence indicated unfitness to perform military duties. The record indicated treatment was improving his symptoms and his symptoms were not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004396
The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation system (DES). After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007669
The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicants submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP's charge with respect to the applicant's MH conditions referred for review that were determined to be not unfitting by the PEB was an assessment of the appropriateness of the PEB fitness adjudication. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011599
The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicants submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the applicant's MH diagnoses, the physical evaluation board (PEB) fitness determination; and if unfitting, a disability rating recommendation in accordance with the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating...