Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150006496
Original file (20150006496.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  28 May 2015	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150006496 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012, and whose MH diagnosis was changed during that process. 

3.  The applicant also states that he has many supporting documents concerning his Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) that the Army did not review. 

4.  The applicant submitted an application through the Department of Defense (DOD) Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system.

2.  The DOD memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of MH diagnoses for service members 
completing a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012, to determine if service members were disadvantaged by a changed diagnosis over the course of their physical disability process.

3.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the PDBR SRP and the applicant was provided a copy.

4.  The applicant did not respond to the advisory opinion.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change to the applicant's disability and retirement determination.

2.  The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the Disability Evaluation System (DES).  The evidence of the available records showed a diagnosis of PTSD was rendered during the DES process.  PTSD was noted in consults and testing during Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) placement, but was not a final narrative summary (NARSUM) diagnosis upon TDRL removal. 

3.  The SRP noted that the NARSUM at TDRL removal noted the historical diagnosis of PTSD and adjudged that it met retention standards at the time of the applicant's TDRL placement, but that PTSD symptoms had worsened and no longer met retention standards.  The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) at TDRL removal addressed the PTSD diagnosis as not ratable, as it was not unfitting on TDRL placement.  At TDRL placement, the neuropsychological testing listed PTSD and the Report of Medical History (DD Form 2807) referred to counseling for PTSD; however, there was no MH condition listed on the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) or PEB.  At TDRL removal, the PEB included the diagnosis of PTSD.  Therefore, the SRP determined that the applicant did not meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Project. 

4.  The SRP next considered whether any mental condition was unfitting for continued military service at the time of the applicant's placement on the TDRL.  The SRP agreed that the record reflected non-limiting symptoms in the period of time leading into the initial MEB.  At no time during the applicant’s military service did he require a psychiatric hospitalization, emergency care or psychotropic medication management.  No MH condition was permanently profiled or was judged to fail retention standards. There was no indication from the record that any MH condition significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance.

5.  The SRP therefore concluded that there was insufficient evidence that any MH condition rose to the level of being unfitting at the time of TDRL placement. PTSD was a diagnosis by the PEB at TDRL removal, and the SRP adjudged that there was not sufficient evidence for any change to the PTSD diagnosis.

6.  The SRP then deliberated if the PTSD condition was compensable at TDRL removal.  Conditions other than those found unfitting at TDRL placement are not ratable at TDRL removal, regardless of disease progression, unless caused by or directly related to treatment of the unfitting condition.  The SRP considered if the psychiatrist’s (Chief of Behavioral Health) analysis of the relationship of PTSD symptoms and the opioid medication used to treat the unfitting right ulnar nerve neuralgia (pain) condition linked the worsening of the PTSD to the treatment of the neuralgia sufficiently to make it ratable at TDRL removal.

7.  The SRP could not find sufficient evidence that the worsening of the applicant’s PTSD was caused by the unfitting right arm neuralgia condition or due to treatment of the neuralgia.  The SRP therefore concluded that no MH condition was ratable at the time of TDRL removal.

8.  The available evidence shows the SRP's assessment should be accepted.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___ DENY APPLICATION













BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.  




      _______ _   _X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20040003532



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                  AR20150006496



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011597

    Original file (20140011597.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP noted that at the time of permanent disability disposition and removal from the TDRL, the PEB rated the applicant's PTSD condition at 50 percent. The SRP considered whether the evidence of record supported ratings for the unfitting MH condition at TDRL exit that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014415

    Original file (20140014415.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System (DES). The SRP noted that the available records show no changes to an MH diagnosis to the applicant's possible disadvantage during the DES process. The SRP agreed with the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) determination that symptoms of depression and anxiety were present.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010918

    Original file (20140010918.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The SRP deliberated whether by a preponderance of evidence a service diagnosis of PTSD could be recommended in this case for a primary MH rating. The SRP agreed that a 100 percent recommendation for total occupational and social impairment at the time of TDRL placement was not indicated. A 70 percent recommendation (occupational and social impairment, with deficiencies in most areas, such as work, school, family relations, judgment, thinking, or mood) was likewise not supported given that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013552

    Original file (20140013552.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The DOD memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of MH diagnoses for service members completing a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012, to determine if service members were disadvantaged by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011036

    Original file (20140011036.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence and did not find evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the Integrated Disability Evaluation System. The SRP reviewed the entire record for evidence that a higher...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015303

    Original file (20140015303.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. At the time of permanent disability disposition and removal from the TDRL, the PEB rated the PTSD at 30 percent. Personality disorder was not noted to be a consistent diagnosis in prior or subsequent exams and the SRP discussed any potential decrease in PTSD rating under...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009051

    Original file (20140009051.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the applicant's MH diagnoses and the physical evaluation board (PEB) fitness determination; and if unfitting, whether the provisions of VASRD Section 4.129 were applicable; and whether a disability rating recommendation in accordance with VASRD Section 4.130 was made. The SRP then considered whether the evidence supported a permanent rating higher than the 30 percent adjudicated by the PEB at the time of the applicant's removal from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015387

    Original file (20140015387.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the Disability Evaluation System (DES).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150008679

    Original file (20150008679.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the Disability Evaluation System. The SRP agreed that Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication of unfitting anxiety disorder NOS was supported...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150007328

    Original file (20150007328.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP agreed that physical evaluation board (PEB) adjudication of unfitting post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was supported by the evidence; therefore, the diagnosis of PTSD was the appropriate diagnosis, and application of the provisions of the Department of Veterans...