Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150008679
Original file (20150008679.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  23 June 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150008679 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012, and whose MH diagnosis was changed during that process. 

3.  The applicant also states that she was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD); however, she did not receive compensation for extreme anxiety, insomnia, or depressive disorder.

4.  The applicant submitted an application through the Department of Defense (DOD) Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system.

2.  The DOD memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of MH diagnoses for service members completing disability evaluation processing between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012, to determine if service members were disadvantaged by a changed diagnosis over the course of their physical disability processing.

3.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the PDBR SRP and the applicant was provided a copy.

4.  The applicant did not respond to the advisory opinion.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change to the applicant's disability and separation determination.

2.  The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the Disability Evaluation System.  The evidence showed the diagnoses of anxiety disorder not otherwise specified (NOS) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) were rendered.  The SRP determined that the MH diagnoses were not changed to the applicant’s possible disadvantage in the disability evaluation.  The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of GAD and noted GAD was recorded in the DD Form 2808 (Report of Medical Evaluation) without reference to symptoms or criteria.  The conditions are similar in presentation and are generally responsive to the same treatment interventions.  Therefore, the applicant did not meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Project.

3.  The SRP acknowledged the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) examiner’s assessment of PTSD; however, the SRP concluded there was insufficient evidence to support a PTSD diagnosis.  The SRP concluded there was insufficient evidence that criterion A or C was met for PTSD, and the condition of anxiety disorder NOS was the appropriate diagnosis.  The SRP agreed that Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication of unfitting anxiety disorder NOS was supported by the evidence and application of the provisions of Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) section 4.129 was correct at Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) placement.

4.  The SRP considered if there was evidence for a VASRD section 4.130 rating higher than 50 percent.  The SRP agreed the record in evidence did not support a higher than 50 percent rating at TDRL placement and there was insufficient evidence for recommending a 70 percent TDRL placement rating.  The SRP agreed at the time of permanent retirement that the record adequately demonstrated that the applicant had not received treatment during the TDRL period.
5.  The SRP agreed that at the time of TDRL removal there was no evidence of social or occupational impairment, and no evidence that any MH condition rose to the level of being unfitting.   After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the applicant’s MH conditions at TDRL placement or removal.

6.  The available evidence shows the SRP's assessment should be accepted.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.  



      _______ _   x_  ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20040003532



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                  AR20150008679



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014262

    Original file (20140014262.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a comprehensive review of the applicant’s case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should no change in the physical evaluation board (PEB) adjudication of the temporary disability and permanent retirement determination. The SRP noted the neurology medical evaluation board (MEB) recorded the diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and that the neuropsychological evaluation had not recorded a diagnosis of PTSD and PTSD had not appeared in any other clinical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014489

    Original file (20140014489.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System (DES). The evidence of the available records shows diagnoses of PTSD, generalized anxiety...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011252

    Original file (20140011252 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP by majority vote recommends that the applicant's prior separation be modified to reflect a Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) rating of 50 percent, in accordance with of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011252

    Original file (20140011252.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP by majority vote recommends that the applicant's prior separation be modified to reflect a Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) rating of 50 percent, in accordance with of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003882

    Original file (20150003882.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SRP recommended no change to the physical evaluation board (PEB) adjudication of the permanent retirement rating of 30 percent for the unfitting mental health condition. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the military Integrated Disability Evaluation System (IDES). The SRP noted that the PEB assigned a disability rating of 30 percent without application of VASRD Section 4.129 (Mental...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013531

    Original file (20140013531.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System (DES). The SRP acknowledged the GAD diagnosis, but there was insufficient evidence for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015409

    Original file (20140015409.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change to the applicant's disability and rating at Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) entry. The SRP determined that an MH diagnoses was changed to the applicant’s possible disadvantage in the disability evaluation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008957

    Original file (20140008957.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System (DES). After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that there was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008957

    Original file (20140008957 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System (DES). After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded that there was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005732

    Original file (20150005732.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the military...