Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004547
Original file (20150004547.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  7 April 2015	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150004547 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show that he is being placed on the Retired List on 1 June 2015 in the rank/grade of sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7 vice staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6.

2.  The applicant states:

   a.  He served in the U.S. Marine Corps (USMC) for 8 years from 1991 to 1999.  He enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) in 2001 and was mobilized and served on active duty for 5 years between 2001 and 2008.  He spent 4 years and 6 months of this active duty service as an SFC.  He is retiring from active duty on 1 June 2015 with over 21 years of military service.  
   
   b.  Realizing he had over 13 years of active service, he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) in 2008 and served continuously until the present.  In order to enlist in the RA, he had to enlist in the rank of SSG.  He was not happy about taking a reduction in rank but he eventually saw the light at the end of the tunnel. He did so because he was assured that he would retire under the military "high-3" program in which one retires at the [average] of the highest paid 3 years of active service and he would be retired in the rank of SFC.
   
   c.  However, this has not happened and his retirement orders state he will be placed on the Retired List in the rank of SSG which will result in a $400 cut in retired pay.  The Retirement Services Center, Fort Bliss, TX, told him this needed to be fixed by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records.
	d.  This was likely caused by a clerical error as the "high-3" is usually the rank held for the last 3 years before retirement but this is not correct in his case.  He was promoted to SFC on 1 December 2003 while serving on active duty as a member of the USAR and he remained on active duty as an SFC until he enlisted in the RA in the rank of SSG.  He served on active duty in the rank of SFC for 4 years.  He believes he earned the retirement rank of SFC, especially since he took a reduction in rank to enlist in the RA during the height of the war on terrorism and deployed to Afghanistan.

3.  The applicant provides two DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and two orders.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Having had prior active service and Reserve service in the USMC, the applicant enlisted in the USAR in the rank/grade of sergeant/E-5 on 2 July 2001. He was promoted to the rank/grade of SSG/E-6 on 12 December 2001.

2.  He was ordered to active duty as a member of the USAR in support of Operation Noble Eagle and he entered active duty on 27 January 2003.  He was promoted to the rank/grade of SFC/E-7 on 1 December 2003.

3.  He was honorably released from active duty on 25 January 2007 in the rank of SFC to the control of the USAR.  He completed 3 years, 11 months, and 29 days of creditable active service during this period.  The DD Form 214 he was issued for this period of service shows he had 8 years and 13 days of prior active service.

4.  He was ordered to active duty as a member of the USAR in support of Operation Enduring Freedom and he entered active duty on 15 June 2007. 

5.  On 14 June 2008, he was honorably released from active duty to the control of the USAR, in the rank of SFC.  He completed 1 year of creditable active service during this period.  The DD Form 214 he was issued for this period of service shows he had 12 years and 8 days of prior active service.  He was subsequently discharged from the USAR.

6.  He enlisted in the RA on 7 July 2008 in the rank of SSG and he is currently serving on active duty in the rank of SSG and is assigned to Fort Bliss, TX.

7.  The applicant provides Orders 054-0047, dated 23 February 2015, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Bliss, wherein it shows he will be honorably retired on 31 May 2015 in the rank of SSG and he will be placed on the Retired List in the rank of SSG on 1 June 2015.  These orders show his date of rank to SSG as 7 July 2008 and that he was voluntarily retiring with 20 years, 5 months, and 16 days of active duty service.  However, his basic pay was based on 21 years, 9 months, and 14 days of active duty service.

8.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 12, sets policies and procedures for voluntary retirement of Soldiers because of length of service and governs the retirement of Soldiers (active RA, Army National Guard (ARNG) and USAR) who are retiring in an enlisted status.  It states RA Soldiers are retired in the rank/grade the Soldier holds on the date of retirement (emphasis added), assuming they served in the rank/grade satisfactorily (emphasis added).  As an exception, ARNG and USAR Soldiers serving on active duty as a member of the ARNG/USAR at the time of retirement in a grade lower than their highest enlisted grade in which they served satisfactorily, who were administratively reduced in grade not as a result of their own misconduct, will retire at the highest enlisted grade in which they served.

9.  Service members receive a percentage of the final basic pay that corresponds to the retired grade and years of service at retirement.  Retired pay would be calculated based on the service member's high-36 month average computed based on the rate for basic pay.

10.  Title 10 U.S. Code, section 3964, states retired members of the Army who are retired with less than 30 years of active service are entitled, when their active service plus their service on the Retired List totals 30 years, to be advanced on the Retired List to the highest grade in which they served on active duty satisfactorily or, in the case of a member of the USAR, in which they served on full-time duty satisfactorily (emphasis added). 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant is serving in the RA in the rank of SSG and he will be honorably retired on 31 May 2015, in the rank of SSG.  In accordance with applicable regulations and laws, he will appropriately be placed on the Retired List on 1 June 2015, in the rank/grade of SSG/E-6, the rank/grade he held at the time of retirement and the highest rank he held while serving in the RA.

2.  As he served satisfactorily on active duty as a member of the USAR in the rank/grade of SFC/E-7, once he reaches a total of 30 years of combined active and retired service (emphasis added), he could petition to be advanced to the highest pay grade he held (SFC/E-7) and pay recalculation would be done at that time.   
3.  In view of the foregoing, he is not entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150004547



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150004547



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007324

    Original file (20140007324.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Orders D-06-036713, dated 4 June 1985 * DD Form 214, ending on 9 February 1983 * ARNG Retirement Points History Statement * Retirement Orders P08-926117, dated 25 August 2010 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. In the applicant's case, the evidence of record shows he was promoted to the rank/grade of SFC/E-7, on 16 January 1980, and he held that grade until 9 February 1983 when he was honorably released from active duty and discharged from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004845

    Original file (20110004845.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect: * Public Law 230, Title 10, and Section 3964 entitle him to promotion to SFC * The "P" shown in item 13 (Primary Specialty Number, Title and Date Awarded) of his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) indicates he was promotable 3. In his self-authored statement the applicant contends he should be advanced on the retired list to the highest grade held satisfactorily while on active duty, under the provisions of Title...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018907

    Original file (20080018907.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 23 December 1987. On 5 November 2008, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years and 2 weeks in pay grade E-6. The evidence of record shows that the applicant is a former member of the RC and held a grade above that of E-6 at the time he elected to enlist in the Regular Army; therefore, a grade determination was required and was submitted by the applicant’s recruiter to Headquarters, USAREC.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003940

    Original file (20140003940.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provides a DA Form 4187, dated 11 May 2011, wherein it stated, due to Record of Proceedings under Article 15, Soldier is to be reduced; grade change from SFC/E-7 to SSG/E-6 effective 3 March 2011, authority Army Regulation 600-8-19, chapter 10, paragraph 10-12b. The applicant provides a DA Form 1559, dated 21 March 2013, he submitted to the NGB IG wherein he requested he be reinstated to SFC and retired as an E-7, the highest grade he held. c. Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018516

    Original file (20140018516.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he was placed on the retired list in the rank/grade of sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7, the highest grade he satisfactorily held, instead of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6. By law, a person granted retired pay will receive such pay in the highest grade satisfactorily held by him or her during his or her entire period of service. The applicant's record should be corrected to show his request for retired pay as an SFC was approved.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017986

    Original file (20140017986.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    As new evidence, the applicant provides a statement of support, dated 30 September 2014, wherein (Retired) Brigadier General (BG) RLT, stated, in part: a. There is no evidence and the applicant hasn't provided any evidence that shows these orders were issued in error. There is no evidence and the applicant hasn't provided any evidence that shows these orders were issued in error.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016684

    Original file (20140016684.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for correction of his military records as follows: * constructive service credit for active duty from 6 November 1997 (date erroneously discharged) to 29 July 2007 (date properly discharged) * consideration for promotion to sergeant major (SGM)/E-9 2. The Board recommended denial of the application that pertains to promoting him to the rank/grade of SGM/E-9; however, the Board recommended all state Army National Guard records and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016642

    Original file (20140016642.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was sentenced to 9 months of confinement as a result of his court-martial * the military judge did not reduce his rank, but he was reduced to E-1 because of the sentence * he was able to retire in the rank of E-1 after 22 years of service * the military judge stated his wife and family deserved his retirement * there was no sentence to reduce his rank 3. An eligible individual should submit an application to the Army Grade Determination Review Board (AGDRB) when...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000537

    Original file (20080000537.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 September 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080000537 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant, the daughter of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests that her father's records be corrected to show, in effect, that he retired in the rank of sergeant first class (SFC), pay grade E-7. The FSM's record shows he entered into the USAR on 5 February 1957 and was discharged on 24 July 1963, in the rank of staff sergeant (SSG)/pay grade E-6.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058741C070421

    Original file (2001058741C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military record shows that he was a member of the Army National Guard (ARNG) of Puerto Rico and that he served on active duty in an Active Guard/Reserve (AGR) status from 4 August 1981 through 31 March 1999, at which time he was REFRAD for the purpose of retirement. Paragraph 12-3b(1) contains the general provisions of law governing retirement and it states in pertinent part, that ARNG soldiers serving on active duty at the time of their retirement, in a grade lower than...