IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 08 June 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090021315 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. 2. The applicant states that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. 3. The applicant provides copies of a newspaper article and a photograph. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. On 20 June 1966, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States for 2 years. He completed his initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11C (Infantryman Indirect Fire Crewman). 3. On 4 November 1966, the applicant departed Fort Polk, Louisiana, for duty in the Republic of Vietnam. On 8 December 1966, he was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Armor Battalion, 69th Armor Regiment. 4. On 18 November 1967, the applicant returned to the United States for duty at Fort Hood, Texas. 5. On 19 June 1968, the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training). He had attained the rank of sergeant, pay grade E-5, and had completed 2 years of creditable active duty service. 6. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 lists his awards as the National Defense Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, Vietnam Service Medal with one bronze service star, and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar. 7. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. 8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS. They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size. 9. U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards), in effect at the time, specifically governed award of the Combat Infantryman Badge to Army forces operating in South Vietnam. This regulation stated that criteria for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge identified the man who trained, lived, and fought as an infantryman and the Combat Infantryman Badge was the unique award established to recognize the infantryman and only the infantryman for his service. Further, "the Combat Infantryman Badge is not an award for being shot at or for undergoing the hazards of day-to-day combat." This regulation also stated the Combat Infantryman Badge was authorized for award to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS and required that they must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size. Appendix V provides that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. 10. The newspaper article provided by the applicant states he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge on 8 April 1966 while assigned to the 69th Armor Regiment. The photograph shows a Soldier kneeling beside his bunk. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. 2. The available evidence clearly shows that he was awarded an infantryman MOS, but was assigned to the headquarters company of an armor battalion while in the Republic of Vietnam. Therefore, his request for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge should be denied. 3. There are no available orders showing the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. The newspaper article and photograph provided by the applicant are not sufficient evidence by themselves upon which to base a correction of his records. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ____X___ ____X__ ____X___ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. _____________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090021315 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090021315 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1