BOARD DATE: 19 May 2015
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150003013
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his commissioning date as a second lieutenant (2LT) and accessioning date into the Army Health Professions Scholarship Program (AHPSP) be corrected to show the date of 16 October 1997 and that he be compensated for tuition payments, stipend, book reimbursement and other benefits he failed to receive from 1997 1999 due to his erroneous disenrollment from the HPSP in 1997 and subsequent re-enrollment in 1999.
2. The applicant states that his records currently show he was commissioned as a 2LT in the HPSP on 23 July 1997; however, he was commissioned and sworn in as a 2LT on 16 October 1997. He goes on to state that when he was recruited into the HPSP he was told that his tuition payments, stipend, book reimbursement and other benefits of the program would begin that year. However, he was later informed that it was being revoked and he would be accessed into the program a year later. He continues by stating that he was commissioned a second time on 1 June 1999 and again on 23 July 1999. He also states that as a newly recruited 2LT he had no concept that he could appeal to restore his original accession in the HPSP and only recently found the documents to support this correction. He further states that he experienced financial burdens due to this error that should have been covered by the Army.
3. The applicant provides copies of his oaths of office, his HPSP Agreement and photographs of him accepting his oaths of office.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicants official records show that he signed a 1- year HPSP agreement on 1 June 1999 and was commissioned as a United States Army Reserve (USAR) 2LT on 23 July 1999. He was commissioned as a USAR Medical Corps captain (CPT) on 23 May 2000 and was ordered to active duty on 5 September 2005.
3. He has continued to serve on active duty and was promoted to the rank of lieutenant colonel on 5 September 2012.
4. The applicant provides a copy of a HPSP Agreement showing that he entered into a 2-year agreement and was commissioned as a 2LT on 16 October 1997. However, it does not indicate that it was accepted by the appropriate officials.
5. In the processing of this case a staff advisory opinion was obtained from Headquarters, U.S. Army Recruiting Command (USAREC) which opines that the agreement provided by the applicant with his application is erroneous because it was never accepted by appropriate officials. Additionally, the applicant was initially selected as an alternate for the 2-year HPSP on 16 July 1997 and it appears that the documents provided by the applicant were completed in error. However, the documents were never entered into the system. Officials at the USAREC go on to state that the applicant was picked up as an alternate for the 1-year program and completed the necessary forms and was enrolled in the HPSP in 1999. Upon graduation, he was appointed as a captain
6. The advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comment and he responded to the effect that regardless of the circumstances, the Army entered into an agreement when he took his oath and it was signed by the recruiter, which made it a binding agreement and the Army had a responsibility to fulfill its obligations under that contract just as he was expected to fulfill his obligations under the HPSP. Accordingly, the Army should be required to uphold the 2-year agreement he entered into.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicants contention that the Army should be required to pay for the 2-year HPSP contract he signed in 1997 has been noted and appears to lack merit.
2. The evidence of record indicates that the applicant was selected as an alternate selectee for the 2-year HPSP; however, the recruiting officials incorrectly initiated a contract and gave him an oath of office for a program that he was not selected for. Accordingly, the contract was never processed to completion.
3. The applicant was selected from the alternate selection list for a 1-year HPSP agreement in 1999 and received the benefits associated with that program and was commissioned as a Medical Corps CPT in 2000.
4. The facts indicate that he did not participate in the HPSP in 1997 and 1998 and therefore is not entitled to benefits for which he was not entitled and he has provided no evidence to show that he was not properly informed at the time of the circumstances.
5. Accordingly, there does not appear to be any basis to grant his request for correction of his records and reimbursement 18 years after the fact.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X_____ ___X_____ __X___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_________X______________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20150003013
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20150003013
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090703C070212
The Surgeon General recommended that the applicant be discharged from the Army Reserve, waiver of the active duty service obligation, and recoupment of all educational expenses, plus interest, under the terms of his service agreement. On 18 October 2002 the applicant was discharged from the Army Reserve. Army Regulation 601-141 establishes the Army portion of the Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship Program, and states in effect, that if a scholarship participant does not complete...
a, second sentence: “I will enter graduate professional education, as selected and directed by the Air Force, immediately following graduation from medical school.”) The recruiter, who was in his first year as a Health Professions Scholarships Program (HPSP) recruiter, was unable to answer whether [the applicant] would have a free selection of a specialty option without influence by the Air Force. A copy of the complete Air Force evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006413
The applicant states a. According to the ARNG AMEDD Officer Incentive Programs for FY08, she was eligible for both the HPLR and the Special Pay Incentive and would have received both if her paperwork had been completed correctly at the time of her accession into the ARNG. According to NGB Incentives Branch, she has a USAREC Form 1252 and USAREC board results which show the intent to contract for the Special Pay and the HPLR benefits.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012976
The applicant requests correction of her records to show entitlement to the Medical and Dental School Stipend Program (MDSSP) incentive offered when she signed her contract on 19 October 2011. The applicant states: * an oversight made by the Army Medical Department (AMEDD) regarding her eligibility for the MDSSP incentive caused the U.S. Army Recruiting Command (USAREC) board results to show she was ineligible * a packet was sent to the National Guard Bureau (NGB) and she was paid for 6...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03145
On 13 Jan 00, HQ ARPC/SGP advised the applicant that review of her physical exam was completed and entries identified a history of migraine headaches that could be disqualifying for military service. The applicant was selected for entry into active duty for an evaluation of this diagnosis to determine if a medically disqualifying condition existed. The transmittal letter also asked the applicant to provide the Board with a copy of her signed HPSP contract.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03145
On 13 Jan 00, HQ ARPC/SGP advised the applicant that review of her physical exam was completed and entries identified a history of migraine headaches that could be disqualifying for military service. The applicant was selected for entry into active duty for an evaluation of this diagnosis to determine if a medically disqualifying condition existed. The transmittal letter also asked the applicant to provide the Board with a copy of her signed HPSP contract.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013547
On 25 March 2007, he signed an Oath of Office as a 2LT in the MNARNG and on 18 June 2007 he was appointed as a Reserve Commissioned Officer of the Army. Title 37, U.S. Code, section 308j(b), states the Secretary concerned may pay an accession bonus under this section to an eligible person who enters into an agreement with the Secretary to (a) accept an appointment as an officer in the Armed Forces, and (b) to serve in the Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve in a skill designated under...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003210
g. As his time for commissioning neared, the recruiter called him and said he was going to be boarded in either February or March 2009. h. He began to see internet chatter stating that his MOS was going to be taken off the critical area of concentration (AOC) list on 1 March 2009. i. The recruiter told him that whether he commissioned in February or March 2009, he would still be eligible for the OAB. r. He was told that the Army National Guard (ARNG) had lost his bonus agreement and unless...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02012
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02012 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be amended to void the recoupment of her Critical Skills Accession Bonus (CSAB) for her sponsorship in the Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship Program (AF HPSP). The complete HQ AFPC/DPAME evaluation is at Exhibit...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010468
He provided a DA Form 2823, dated 15 April 2014, wherein he stated: * on or about 28 August 2006, he accepted a 2-year ROTC scholarship at the University of South Florida and received tuition, room and board, and a monthly stipend * on or about 17 May 2007, he entered the FLARNG through the SMP, which guaranteed him a commission in the ARNG upon his commissioning from the ROTC on 2 May 2008 * as a result of his transition into the SMP, his tuition was covered by the ROTC scholarship;...