Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002301
Original file (20150002301.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  10 September 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150002301 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests upgrade of his under honorable conditions discharge (general) to an honorable discharge.

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  he served as the company clerk in Korea.

	b.  his first sergeant (1SG) arrived a few months before he returned to the United States of America U.S.A., was gay, and constantly approached him and offered him a stripe on his patch for various considerations.

	c.  during his separation he was given a DD Form 217A (Armed Forces of the U.S. Report of Transfer or Discharge) and DD Form 214 (Certificate of Service, Armed Forces of the U.S.).

	d.  one form stated that he served honorably and he had no reason to  question it.

	e.  his 1SG was only there for a short time and tried to court-martial him under Article 13 (sic Article 15) which was dropped after a meeting with the company commander.

	f.  during his service in Korea, he passed an Inspector General's inspection with high marks for the orderly room and motor pool.

	f.  he was a squad leader during his 16 weeks of training.

	g.  he enjoyed his relations with his peers and officers. 

3.  The applicant provides a DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  His military record is not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) in 1973.  It is believed that his records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents on file for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.  

3.  The applicant submitted a DD Form 214 which shows he was inducted into the Army of the U.S (AUS) on 19 July 1956, which shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 26 January 1956 and served until he was discharged under honorable conditions on 1 May 1958.  This DD Form 214 also shows that he was issued a DD Form 217A certificate.

4.  He submitted a DD Form 217A which shows he served honorably on active duty in the AUS.

5.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.  Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.

6.  Special Regulation 615-360-1 (Enlisted Personnel, Separation of Enlisted Personnel), in effect at the time, provided that the purpose of a separation certificate was to provide the individual with documentary evidence of military service and to furnish a vital record for interested government agencies which assist the individual in obtaining the rights and benefits which may accrue to him as the result of such service.  A DD Form 217A was authorized for enlisted personnel who were separated with an honorable or general, under honorable conditions release form active military service.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under honorable conditions (general).  His DD Form 217A shows he served honorably.

2.  By the applicant's own admission, his 1SG tried to court-martial him under Article 15, but the company commander dropped it.  Therefore, it is presumed that he received a lessor form of punishment for an unstated offense and is not entitled to have his DD Form 214 corrected to show he received an honorable discharge.

3.  There is no evidence which indicates the applicant was not properly and equitably discharged in accordance with the regulations in effect at the time.  There is no evidence that all requirements of law and regulations were not met, or the rights of the applicant were not fully protected throughout the separation process.  Absent such evidence, regularity must be presumed in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150002301





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150002301



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020021

    Original file (20140020021.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 1 (Last Name - First Name - Middle Name) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the spelling of his last name as M_is___ instead of M_si___. The applicant provides: * Certificate of Birth * Marriage License * DD Form 214 * Certificate for completion of Motor Mechanics School * Certificate of Proficiency for the Artillery Track Vehicle Maintenance Course * Letter, subject: Discharge from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027128

    Original file (20100027128.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 217A (Honorable Discharge Certificate) to show his discharge date as 3 February 1964 vice 10 February 1961. The applicant states, in effect, he was fully discharged (from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR)) on 10 February 1961 because of hypertension. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100027128 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100027128 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017792

    Original file (20110017792.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his last name be changed from Snxxx to Scxxx on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and DD Form 217A (Certificate of Service). This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. He is advised that a copy of this decision...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008777

    Original file (20090008777.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he was retired in the rank/grade of first sergeant (1SG)/E-8. The applicant states that he served as a first sergeant but was placed on the retired list in the rank/grade of master sergeant (MSG)/E-8. Orders 109-023, Headquarters, 104th Division (Training), Vancouver, WA, dated 6 November 1986, reassigned the applicant to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement), St. Louis, MO, by reason of personal –...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050012822C070206

    Original file (20050012822C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show his date of birth as 15 April 1939, not 5 December 1938. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016311

    Original file (20100016311.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records contain no evidence to show he was selected for promotion to pay grade E-9. Army Regulation 135-180 (Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service) states that an MSG who formerly held the title of 1SG and who wishes to be shown on the Army of the United States (AUS) Retired List in his or her former title must include a copy of the appointment to 1SG with the DD Form 108 (Application for Retired Pay Benefits). In order to justify correction of a military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000768

    Original file (20090000768.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was awarded the AGCM after his release from active duty (REFRAD). This case is being considered using reconstructed records that primarily consist of the applicant's DD Form 214, an NA Form 13038 (Certification of Military Service) issued by the National Archives and Records Administration, National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), and a DA Form 1577 (Authorization for Issuance of Awards) that remain in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002394

    Original file (20120002394.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 September 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120002394 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in Item 33 (Record of Assignments) the applicant: a. entered the basic combat training course at Fort Chafee, on 22 November 1955; b. entered advanced individual training at Fort Lewis, on 15 February 1956; c. was assigned to the 9th Infantry Regiment at Fort Lewis on 21 April 1956 with duty as an ammunition...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007777

    Original file (20130007777.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states: * he was on active duty from 7 July 1954 to 3 July 1956 * he served in Korea from 31 January 1954 to 28 May 1956 with the Korean Military Advisory Group (KMAG), 8202th Army Unit (AU) * he was recently informed he qualified for the KDSM and NDSM which were never recorded on his DD Form 214 * his rank at separation was specialist three (SP3)/corporal which was pay grade E-4 * pay...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016782

    Original file (20100016782.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. His DD Form 214 for active military service during the period 31 January 1949 through 9 February 1950 is not available. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to change the date he entered on active duty on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 June 1956.