Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016782
Original file (20100016782.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  14 December 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100016782 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) for the period ending 26 January 1956 to show he entered active duty on 31 January 1949.

2.  He states, in effect, his DD Form 214 shows he entered active duty on 
10 February 1950.  However, he was inducted into the Army of the United States (AUS) on 31 January 1949 and he was discharged on 9 February 1950 prior to his enlistment in the Regular Army (RA) on 10 February 1950.  Therefore, the entry date of his DD Form 214 should be changed to 31 January 1949.

3.  He provides Selective Service System (SSS) Form 252, dated 3 January 1949, and his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 

has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, this case is being considered using reconstructed records, which primarily consist of his DD Form 214 and SSS Form 252.

3.  He was inducted into the AUS on 31 January 1949.  His DD Form 214 for active military service during the period 31 January 1949 through 9 February 1950 is not available.  

4.  On 10 February 1950, he enlisted in the RA.  On 26 June 1956, the applicant was honorably discharged from active duty.  His record of service on his 
DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 June 1956 shows in:

* item 22 (Net Service Completed for Pay Purposes this Period) the entry “5” Years, "11" Months, and "17" Days
* item 23 (Other Service Completed for Pay Purposes) the entry “1” Year, "0" Months, and "9" Days
* item 24 (Total Net Service Completed for Pay Purposes) the entry “6” Years, "11" Months, and "26" Days

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  It is a summary of a Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active service and provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  Prior to 1 October 1979, Army Regulation 635-5 provided that a DD Form 214 would be prepared for individuals upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that the entry date on the DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 June 1956 should be corrected to show he entered active duty on 
31 January 1949 instead of 10 February 1950.  Records show he was inducted into the AUS on 31 January 1949 and he was honorably discharged on 
9 February 1949.  However, the DD Form 214 for that period of service is not available.  There is a presumption that the Army issued him a DD Form 214 for that period of active service and the document is not available.  The applicant has not indicated that he did not receive a DD Form 214 for that period.

2.  In accordance with Army Regulation 635-5, the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty.  The applicant’s 
DD Form 214 for the ending period 26 June 1956 correctly shows he entered active duty on 10 February 1950 and he was honorably discharged on 26 June 1956.  His entire period of continuous service was captured from his enlistment to his discharge for that term of service.  In addition, his prior period of active service of 1 year and 9 days was incorporated in item 23 of this DD Form 214.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to change the date he entered on active duty on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 June 1956.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.  




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100016782



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100016782



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009888C070208

    Original file (20040009888C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    This DD Form 214 was corrected on 11 June 1975 to show his enlistment for 3 years on 1 February 1950, his honorable discharge on 31 January 1953; his reenlistment for 3 years on 1 February 1953, his honorable discharge on 31 January 1956; and his reenlistment for 6 years on 1 February 1956. The versions of the regulation in effect throughout the applicant’s military service called for a DD Form 214 to be prepared and issued at the conclusion of a Soldier’s period of enlistment, or on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000579C070206

    Original file (20050000579C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides letters, dated 29 November 2000, 3 July 2002, 4 September 2003, 30 October 2003, and 28 June 2004, from the National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Missouri; general orders for the Combat Infantryman Badge, dated 18 January 1945, awarding members of Company C, 23rd Infantry Regiment the Combat Infantryman Badge effective 1 September 1950, awarding members of Company C, 23rd Infantry Division the Combat Infantryman Badge effective 1 September 1950; special orders...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060808C070421

    Original file (2001060808C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of his military records to reflect sufficient Reserve Component service credit to receive retired pay. For the time that the applicant was appointed an officer in the ARNG, 1 June 1955 through 28 February 1959, only the period of 1 June 1955 through 6 June 1956, is credited with retirement points as 1 year creditable for retired pay at age 60.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012720

    Original file (20100012720.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Department of Defense (DD) Form 4 (Enlistment Record - United States Army) shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA), at Manchester, NH for a period of three (3) years on 4 January 1951: a. The evidence of records shows: a. There is no evidence of record, and the applicant provides insufficient evidence, to show the Army committed fraud and failed to credit him with 6 years of military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078673C070215

    Original file (2002078673C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that the computation of his active military service is in error and his separation document (DD Form 214) contains incorrect service dates in Item 18 (Record of Service), and should be corrected to show the accurate total of active military service and the total service for pay he completed as verified by his military records. The applicant provides a statement from an Asst AG, dated 7 January 1976, which indicates that the applicant continued to serve on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008599C070208

    Original file (20040008599C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    An enlisted Reserve member in an active status who served at least 18 years but less than 20 years may not be discharged from a Reserve component until the member reaches 20 years of service and qualifies for retirement. He had earned 13 of those qualifying years between the retirement years beginning with his enlistment in the USAR on 24 July 1975 and his discharge during RYE 23 July 1990. Had the ending year for the applicant's first year of service been correctly computed based upon the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086798C070212

    Original file (2003086798C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although section 9 of the applicant's DA Form 24 shows he was awarded the Army of Occupation Medal with Germany clasp, the Board concludes that he did not meet the eligibility criteria for that award. The Board concludes that the applicant did not meet the eligibility criteria for award of the Army of Occupation Medal for service in Korea. That the applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 1 October 1963 be amended to add two awards of the Army Good Conduct Medal and the National...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018341

    Original file (20080018341.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence shows the applicant served with a unit in Korea during the period covered by his DD Form 214. The date of his alleged arrival in Korea is after the qualifying period for award of the Korean Service Medal. Based on this evidence, the applicant is entitled to award of the Korea Defense Service Medal and to have it added to his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000537

    Original file (20080000537.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 September 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080000537 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant, the daughter of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests that her father's records be corrected to show, in effect, that he retired in the rank of sergeant first class (SFC), pay grade E-7. The FSM's record shows he entered into the USAR on 5 February 1957 and was discharged on 24 July 1963, in the rank of staff sergeant (SSG)/pay grade E-6.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000068C070208

    Original file (20040000068C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) be corrected to show he completed airborne training, was assigned to the 511th Airborne Infantry, was awarded the Army of Occupation Medal with Japan clasp, and to show his foreign service included the time he spent in Japan as well as in Korea. The applicant provides his DD Form 214 for the period ending 13 January 1955; a Basic Airborne Course completion certificate; a...