IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 8 September 2015
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150002049
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests an upgrade of his general discharge to an honorable discharge.
2. The applicant states:
a. He would like to continue his life dream of becoming a police officer.
b. He will be attending college and taking law classes and then he will be applying for Officer Recruit School.
c. It is his understanding that having a military background with an honorable discharge will be accredited for extra points, which will increase his chances as one of their picks.
d. Now that his children are older, he has a chance to make a difference in the city in which he lives.
e. He would be willing to give 100 percent in order to achieve his goal and changing his discharge status will do that.
3. The applicant provides no additional evidence.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 8 February 1990. He completed training as an administrative specialist.
3. On 5 March 1992, the applicant was notified that charges were pending against him for four specifications of uttering bad checks. He acknowledged receipt of the notification and after consulting with counsel, he submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
4. On 20 March 1992, the appropriate authority approved the applicant's request and directed the issuance of a discharge under other than honorable conditions.
5. On 6 April 1992, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. He completed 2 years, 1 month, and 29 days of net active service this period. He was discharged under other than honorable conditions.
6. On 30 November 2007, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) upgraded the applicant's discharge from under other than honorable conditions to general under honorable conditions.
7. Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel Separations) sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
a. Chapter 10 states that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, an undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate at the time of the applicants discharge.
b. Paragraph 3-7a states that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's contentions have been noted.
2. However, his desire to become a police officer is not sufficiently mitigating to warrant an upgrade of the general discharge he currently holds. According to the applicable regulation, the honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.
3. The applicant had charges pending against him for uttering numerous bad checks. He submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The appropriate authority directed the issuance of a discharge under other than honorable conditions.
4. The ADRB upgraded the applicant's discharge from under other than honorable conditions to general under honorable conditions. He has not shown error or injustice in the characterization of service he currently holds.
5. In view of the foregoing, his request should be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___x____ ___x____ ___x___ _ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
__________x________________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20150002049
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20150002049
4
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007712
The applicant requests an upgrade of her under other than honorable conditions discharge to a general discharge. The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) she was issued shows she was discharged for the good of the service, in lieu of trial by a court-martial with a character of service of under other than honorable conditions. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014942
In his request for discharge, the applicant indicated that he understood that by requesting discharge, he was admitting guilt to the charges against him or of a lesser included offense that also authorized the imposition of a bad conduct discharge or a discharge under other than honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time of his discharge shows he was discharged for the good of the service with a character of service of UOTHC. In order to justify correction of a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007367
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that his discharge characterized as under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to honorable. The applicant argues, in effect, that his discharge is unjust because he proudly and honorably served his country during the Gulf War and he was experiencing difficulties with his wife's infidelity during his deployment.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012887
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 31 January 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070012887 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant's records do not show any significant acts of valor during his military service. This form also shows that he completed 5 years, 1 month, and 5 days of creditable military service.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02256
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02256 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 23 January 1992, the commander approved the request for discharge and separated her with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. We took notice of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012483
The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a general discharge. The applicant's military personnel records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 26 January 1990 for a period of 4 years. Therefore, there is insufficient substantive evidence to upgrade the applicant's under other than honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001371
The application submitted in this case is dated 18 January 2007. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021277
However, his records do contain a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) which shows that he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 8 May 1987 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-120 (Personnel Separations Officer Resignations and Discharges), chapter 5, due to conduct triable by court-martial. A general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017359
The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a general discharge. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 March 1992 for a period of 4 years and training as a medical specialist. The complete facts and circumstances surrounding his administrative discharge are not present in the available records; however, his records do show that after consulting with defense counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge under the...
NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01472
The Applicant requested the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION While the NDRB respects the fact that the Applicant has a strong desire to reenlist to serve our “country in its time of need,” his prior service is equitably characterized as being performed under other than honorable conditions.