Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001999
Original file (20150001999.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	IN THE CASE OF: 

	BOARD DATE: 8 October 201

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150001999


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he made a Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) election for spouse and children coverage effective the date of his marriage.

2.  The applicant states he received his notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (Twenty-Year Letter) on 31 May 1991 and made his election for Reserve Component Survivor Benefits Plan (RCSBP) within the necessary timeframe.  After submitting the required paperwork, he was advised that the person he identified as his beneficiary was not eligible.  Accordingly, on 14 April 1992, the submission was changed.  On 13 February 1993, he married that same person.  He subsequently provided all the necessary documents to his unit administrator for the marriage and the birth of their child to update his RCSBP.  He assumed that all the necessary changes would be made.  In January 2010, when he applied for retirement, the retirement services officer filled in the option for spouse coverage.  Again, he assumed everything had been done to protect his family.  In February 2014, he received a letter informing him that his spouse would not receive SBP benefits and advised him of what he needed to do before reaching 65 years of age.  He went with his spouse to get new identification cards.  At that time, he asked why his spouse was not listed and was told she was not a beneficiary.

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* Twenty-Year Letter, dated 31 May 1991
* DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate), dated             25 August 1991
* DD Form 1883, dated 14 April 1992
* State of Michigan Marriage License and Certificate, dated in February 1993
* State of Michigan Certificate of Live Birth, dated 3 October 1993
* National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) effective 31 March 1997
* NGB Form 23A (Army National Guard Current Annual Statement) prepared 22 April 1997
* DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) dated 20 August 2009
* DD Form 108 (Application for Retired Pay Benefits) dated 20 August 2009
* Standard Form 1199A (Direct Deposit Sign-Up Form) dated 20 August 2009

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was born on X January 1950.  Accordingly, he reached 60 years of age on X January 2010.

3.  The applicant received a Twenty-Year Letter dated 31 May 1991.  This letter made no mention of the RCSBP other than to list as an enclosure a summary of SBP benefits.

4.  A DD Form 1883, dated 25 August 1991, shows the applicant indicated he was not married and had no children.  However, he listed as an insurable interest person, his future spouse.  He checked option "C" for immediate coverage based on his full retired pay.

5.  A DD Form 1883, dated 14 April 1992, shows the applicant indicated he was not married and had no children.  He checked option “A” to defer his election.  He did not indicate any insurable interest person.

6.  A State of Michigan Certificate of Marriage shows the applicant married on 
13 February 1993 to the person he previously listed as an insurable interest person on his DD Form 1883 dated in 1991.

7.  A State of Michigan Certificate of Birth dated 3 October 1993, shows the applicant’s spouse gave birth to a son on XX September 1993.

8.  An NGB Form 22, effective 31 March 1997, shows the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve.

9.  An NGB Form 23A, prepared on 22 April 1997, shows the applicant had completed 26 years of qualifying service for retired pay at 60 years of age.

10.  On 20 August 2009, the applicant completed DD Form 2656 requesting retirement effective X January 2010, the date of his 60th birthday.  He also identified his spouse and child as dependents and elected SBP coverage for both based on his full retired pay.  The form was signed by the applicant and witnessed the same day.

11.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.

12.  Public Law 95-397, the Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP), enacted                 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60.  Three options are available:  (A)  elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B)  elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C)  elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60.  At the time, a member must have made the election within 90 days of receiving the notification of eligibility to receive retired pay at age 60 or else have waited until he/she applied for retired pay and elected to participate in the standard SBP.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The available evidence shows that the applicant received a Twenty-Year Letter based on his completion of 20 qualifying years.  The evidence shows that the applicant submitted DD Form 1883 within the required 90 day period requesting coverage for an insurable interest person who he later married.

2.  The evidence shows that in April 1992, a second DD Form 1883 was processed showing the applicant did not have any eligible dependents but that he had requested option “A” to defer his election.  This form appears to have been drafted in response to the applicant being advised that he had no insurable interest beneficiary.  Accordingly, it appears the applicant had no RCSBP coverage in place and was authorized to make an SBP election in conjunction with the submission of his retirement application.

3.  In February 1993 the applicant married the individual he originally indicated as having an insurable interest.  In September 1993, they had a child.

4.  In August 2009, just 5 months prior to his 60th birthday, the applicant applied for retired pay and elected SBP coverage for his spouse and child.  However, it does not appear this form was processed by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS).

5.  The evidence shows the applicant did not have eligible dependents when he received his Twenty-Year Letter.  When he became eligible to apply for retired pay, he had eligible dependents and submitted an appropriate election for SBP coverage.  Accordingly, this request should have been processed.

BOARD VOTE:

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that the applicant, upon receipt of his Twenty-Year Letter, did not elect insurable interest coverage, but instead deferred his election which was timely received and processed.  He then elected to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan at the time of his request for retired pay and his election was accepted and processed by the appropriate office in a timely manner.




      ___________x___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20070016793



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150001999



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028722

    Original file (20100028722.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides one of the FSM's Retiree Account Statements with an effective date of 5 December 2005. The statement shows the FSM elected spouse-only SBP coverage and shows his spouse's DOB as 27 September 1948. It would be appropriate to correct his DFAS records to show he elected former spouse coverage and option B under the RCSBP.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006907

    Original file (20120006907.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her late husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected Reserve Component (RC) Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for her. A DD Form 108, dated 19 March 2003, shows the FSM's sister, Carol R. D____, applied for retired pay for the FSM with a beginning date of 24 October 2000. On 19 March 2003, this sister applied for retired pay for the FSM with a beginning date of 24 October 2000.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006521

    Original file (20090006521.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In a separate letter to DFAS, Military Retirement Pay the applicant requested termination of the Natural Interest Person SBP coverage. The Reserve Component cost of the SBP accounts for the annuity cost if the applicant had died prior to his 60th birthday as he elected Option C (Immediate Coverage) on his DD Form 1883 that he submitted on 10 January 1991. The premium for the Reserve Component portion of the RCSBP is a debt the applicant incurred when he elected Option C. As such, his named...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006196C070205

    Original file (20060006196C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, when her husband was notified in 1991 of his eligibility for retired pay at age 60, he was single and listed his sister as the person to receive his RCSBP annuity. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448 (Application of Plan), provides, in pertinent part, that a person who is not married and has no dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP, but who later marries or acquires a dependent child may elect to participate in the Plan. However,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014058

    Original file (20080014058.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to correction of his records to show that he rescinded his election to participate in the RCSBP or SBP. The evidence of record shows that the applicant attained age 60 and eligibility for retired pay on 15 July 2008. In support of that effort, a copy of DD Form 2656-2 (Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Termination Request) is being provided to the applicant, along with this Record of Proceedings.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004101899C070208

    Original file (2004101899C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since he had elected children only coverage, he had to elect either option B or option C. If he were married, he and his spouse had to sign the reverse of the DD Form 1883. The available evidence of record shows that the FSM was not married to the applicant in May 1989; therefore, he could not have elected spouse coverage at that time. The available evidence of record shows that the FSM and the applicant married in October 1989; therefore, by the time the March 1992 letter was sent out...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013176

    Original file (20140013176.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected enrollment in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) under Option A (Defer Coverage) instead of Option C (Immediate Coverage). She states the applicant came to see her regarding his application for retired pay. Three options were available: * Option A - elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation * Option B - elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062248C070421

    Original file (2001062248C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    B___ then applied to this Board for the RCSBP annuity in 1995. Since he was married on the date he was eligible to participate in the RCSBP, by law he could not have made a person with insurable interest election. However, since it was clearly the FSM’s intent to provide for his former spouse, the applicant, and not B___, and since spousal concurrence with a failure to elect spouse coverage was not required at the time, there was no legal error or injustice in not granting B___ the RCSBP annuity.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011338C070208

    Original file (20040011338C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Carmen Duncan | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record confirms the applicant married his current spouse on 29 May 1994; however, he was unaware he had to make his spouse SBP election within one year of the marriage. In view of the facts of this case, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of equity to correct his record to show he terminated SBP coverage for his sister under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007559

    Original file (20120007559.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 April 2011, by letter to DFAS, the applicant stated: * She had enclosed the necessary documentation DFAS requested regarding the FSM's death * She had been informed the last retirement payment would be made via direct deposit, and further payments would be terminated due to the FSM's death * She understood she was not entitled to compensation regarding his retirement pay because she was not his dependent * She was designated as his natural insurable interest SBP beneficiary on his DD...