Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011338C070208
Original file (20040011338C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:         4 October 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20040011338


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Yvonne Foskey                 |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Mark D. Manning               |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Larry C. Bergquist            |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Carmen Duncan                 |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests to change his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP)
Election Certificate to show his current spouse as the beneficiary.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he would like to change his SBP
Election Certificate (DD Form 1883) to change his “Insurable Interest”
election that provides protection for his sister to a “Spouse Only”
election, which would protect his current spouse.  He further states that
after reading the September 2003, Army Echoes Bulletin published for
retired Army Personnel he discovered that he was responsible for updating
his retired pay file within one year of marriage or remarriage and that he
needed to make or update his SBP election on the DD Form 1883.

3.  The applicant provides the following documents in support of his
application:  DD Form 1883; Marriage License; and Self-Authored Letter.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
that occurred on 29 May 1994.  The application submitted in this case is
dated
10 December 2004.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant's record shows he served in an enlisted status in the
United States Army Reserve (USAR) from 2 September 1969 until 29 July 1972.
 On
30 July 1972, he was appointed a second lieutenant and continued to serve
in the USAR in an officer status until being transferred to the Retired
Reserve on
1 August 2000.

4.  On 23 May 1990, the applicant received his Notification of Eligibility
for Retired Pay at Age 60 (Twenty-Year) letter.  This letter informed him
that he must complete his initial SBP Election Certificate within 90
calendar days from the date of receipt of his Notification of Eligibility
for Retired Pay.

5.  On 25 September 1990, the applicant completed his SBP Election
Certificate, DD Form 1883, and elected “Natural Person with Insurable
Interest" coverage for his sister under Option C (Immediate Coverage).

6.  On 29 May 1994, the applicant married his current spouse.

7.  On 15 February 2005, a Retirement Services Coordinator from the United
States Army Human Resource Command (HRC)-St. Louis replied to the
applicant's RCSBP coverage inquiry.  This official stated that the
applicant had contacted the Center on several occasions since March 2001
concerning his DD Form 1883 election and was advised he had failed to
submit the change in his marital status within one year from the date of
marriage.  As a result, HRC no longer had the authority to make such a
change.

8.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that
military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide
for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  Public Law 95-397, the
RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had
qualified for Reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an
annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60.  Three
options are available:  (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age
60 whether to start RCSBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary
receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until
the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary
receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60.  If death
does not occur before age 60, the RCSBP costs for options B and
C are deducted from the member's retired pay.  Once a member elects either
Options B or C in any category of coverage, that election is irrevocable
except as provided for by law.  Option B and C participants do not make a
new SBP election at age 60.

9.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(a)(1) provides that a member who was
not married and had no dependent child upon becoming eligible to
participate in the SBP and therefore elected an insurable interest
beneficiary, can terminate SBP coverage for such a beneficiary at anytime.
A member in this situation is then permitted to elect a spouse (who he or
she married after retirement) as his or her SBP beneficiary, but this
election must be made within one year of marriage.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions have been noted and it is reasonable to
presume that had he been aware that it was his responsibility to update his
retired pay file within one year of marriage/remarriage he would have done
so in a timely manner.

2.  By law, a member may terminate an insurable interest SBP election to
terminate that election at anytime, and is permitted to elect spouse
coverage if married subsequent to retirement.  This spouse election should
be made within in 1 year of the marriage.  The evidence of record confirms
the applicant married his current spouse on 29 May 1994; however, he was
unaware he had to make his spouse SBP election within one year of the
marriage.

3.  In view of the facts of this case, it would be appropriate and serve
the interest of equity to correct his record to show he terminated SBP
coverage for his sister under the insurable interest election, and elected
spouse coverage within one year of his marriage to his current wife on the
date of his marriage, 29 May 1994.

BOARD VOTE:

__MDM__  __LCB __  __CM___  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file.  As a
result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the
individual concerned be corrected by showing he terminated insurable
interest SBP coverage for his sister, and elected spouse SBP coverage for
his current wife on 30 May 1994, the day after his marriage.




                                  _____Mark D. Manning____
                                            CHAIRPERSON

                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20040011338                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |2005-10-04                              |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |HD,                                     |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |2000/08/01                              |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR140-10 . . . . .                      |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |Retired Reserve                         |
|BOARD DECISION          |Grant                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Chun                                |
|ISSUES         1.       |137                                     |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006907

    Original file (20120006907.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her late husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected Reserve Component (RC) Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for her. A DD Form 108, dated 19 March 2003, shows the FSM's sister, Carol R. D____, applied for retired pay for the FSM with a beginning date of 24 October 2000. On 19 March 2003, this sister applied for retired pay for the FSM with a beginning date of 24 October 2000.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007406

    Original file (20140007406.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, he completed a DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) at the time he received his Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-Year Letter). The applicant contends, in effect, that his military records should be corrected to show he elected RCSBP coverage for his spouse within a year of their marriage. In 2003, when he married, he had a 1-year period in which to submit an RCSBP election to provide coverage for his spouse.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017610

    Original file (20110017610.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to change his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) election from "natural person with insurable interest" to "spouse only." Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Force Management Policy) memorandum, subject: Sections 637 and 638 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995, Public Law 103-337, October 5, 1994, Changed Provisions of the Uniformed Services Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP), dated 17 March 1995,...

  • CG | BCMR | Retirement Cases | 2011-041

    Original file (2011-041.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

     If Option A is elected at time of 20 year satisfactory service letter, and spouse concurs, member will have an opportunity to elect into the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) at age 60. (B) Reserve-component annuity participants.--A person who (i) is eligible to participate in the Plan under paragraph (1)(B), and (ii) is married or has a dependent child when he is notified under section 12731(d) of this title that he has completed the years of 2 Pub. § 1448(a)(5), entitled “Participation by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017903

    Original file (20090017903.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show that within one year of her marriage she elected to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) with spouse only coverage at the full base rate. DFAS records show that: a. the applicant's letter and marriage certificate were received on 29 April 2008, b. DFAS sent her a DD Form 2656 on 19 June 2008, c. on 24 June 2009, DFAS received the applicant's DD Form 2656 but did not process it because it was received more than a year after...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021982

    Original file (20120021982.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A person who is not married and does not have a dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP may elect to provide an annuity to a natural person with an insurable interest in the member. Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Force Management Policy) memorandum, dated 17 March 1995, subject: Sections 637 and 638 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995, Public Law 103-337, dated 5 October 1994, Changed Provisions of the Uniformed Services...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006196C070205

    Original file (20060006196C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, when her husband was notified in 1991 of his eligibility for retired pay at age 60, he was single and listed his sister as the person to receive his RCSBP annuity. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448 (Application of Plan), provides, in pertinent part, that a person who is not married and has no dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP, but who later marries or acquires a dependent child may elect to participate in the Plan. However,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006415

    Original file (20080006415.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 Memorandum, dated 17 November 1988. c. DD Form 1883, dated 7 January 1989. d. Certificate of Marriage, dated 2 August 2000. e. Miscellaneous letters and Designation of Beneficiary Forms from the New York State Police and Fire Retirement System. This letter notified the FSM that he had completed the required years of service and would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60. Even if the FSM had been able to enroll the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011026

    Original file (20130011026.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He is now requesting that the election be granted for his spouse "Karen" to receive the RCSBP upon his death. The applicant's records do not indicate he elected to participate in the RCSBP within 90 days of receiving his 20-year letter. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * showing he never made an RCSBP election * showing he submitted an SBP election for spouse coverage only based on the full amount upon...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011952

    Original file (20140011952.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also provided copies of page 2 of his DD Forms 2656, dated 30 December 2011 and 26 July 2012, that show he married T____ A. H____ on 17 March 2010 and he elected spouse-only coverage based on full gross pay; b. two copies of page 2 of his DFAS-CL Form 7220/148, undated, that show: * his retired pay account was established on 26 July 2013 * his SBP spouse-only coverage was $24.20 * T____ A. M____ was the beneficiary for 100 percent of his arrears of pay and she was listed as his wife * he...