Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001961
Original file (20150001961.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  28 April 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150001961 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests relief from recoupment of a Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) in the amount of $7,375.

2.  The applicant states, in effect:

* to maintain eligibility for the NPSEB he was required to pass the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT)
* he failed the APFT twice
* he requested, as an exception to policy, that the National Guard Bureau (NGB) not recoup the NPSEB; his request was denied
* he actually passed the APFT while the NGB was considering his ETP request
* being required to repay the $7,375.00 would create an extreme financial hardship for his family; he has four children, one of whom is a newborn
* his wife attends school and, as such, he has limited work hours
* his family cannot afford additional monthly payments; he is already working as much as possible just to make ends meet
* he is willingly forfeit the remainder of the bonus
* he is currently in compliance with APFT requirements

3.  The applicant provides photocopies of the ETP request he submitted to the NGB, dated 24 February 2014, and the NGB denial memorandum.



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Wisconsin Army National Guard (WIARNG) on 9 November 2009.  After completing initial training, he was awarded military occupational specialty 88M (Motor Transport Operator).  He is currently serving in the WIARNG in the rank/grade of specialist/E-4.

2.  On 9 November 2009, as part of his enlistment he signed and initialed an Annex E (Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus Addendum - ARNG) to the 
DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document - Armed Forces of the United States).  Section V (Termination), paragraph 2k, states two consecutive record APFT failures will result in termination of bonus eligibility.

3.  Available records show the applicant failed to pass his record APFTs on at least three occasions:

* 2 August 2012
* 1 January 2013
* 14 June 2013

4.  The applicant's memorandum, dated 24 February 2014, requested an ETP to retain the incentive payment that he had received without recoupment.  He essentially stated:

* on 12 February 2014, he received a memorandum informing him that his incentive eligibility would be terminated and the $7,375 that he received would be recouped, which would create a hardship for his family
* he had four children to include a newborn
* according to the memorandum, he failed two record APFTs (on 
11 September 2010 and 3 May 2011, respectively)
* his civilian job as a commercial truck driver demanded that he travel 6 to 
7 days a week working between 12 to 14 hours per day
* he was not always able to find a place to run on his truck routes; it was this portion of the APFT that he had failed
* the poor economy has forced him to work twice as hard just to make the same level of income he had made earlier
* it really bothers him that he has failed the APFT; he wants to improve and pass
* his wife was in school full-time and, as such, her work hours were very limited and they were just making ends meet


* he was willing to forfeit the remainder of the bonus; but he was requesting relief from recoupment of the payment he received
* he loved being a Soldier; his leadership would confirm he always went above and beyond what was expected
* he joined to serve his country and State, but fulfilling his commitment in a tough economy had been very challenging 

5.  A memorandum, dated 19 December 2014 from the NGB, subject:  Request for ETP for NPSEB (applicant) states:

* request for ETP is denied
* the applicant failed two consecutive APFT's which violates ARNG Selected Reserve Incentive Program Policy Guidance 07-06, updated 1 March 2009
* the applicant's recoupment is effective the date of the second APFT failure

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the challenges faced by the applicant are acknowledged, when he signed the Annex E addendum he confirmed he understood he was required to pass the APFT.  He was not able to fulfill this requirement; therefore, his eligibility was terminated and the incentive payment he received will be recouped.

2.  Based upon the foregoing, there is insufficient basis upon which to grant the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ___X_____  ___X__  DENY APPLICATION








BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case
are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150001961





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150001961



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002074

    Original file (20150002074.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect: * she hurt her knee and this caused her to fail two record Army Physical Fitness Tests (APFT) * she consulted her physician and, after being referred to a specialist, she learned what caused her to fail the APFT * she participated in physical therapy and was given a permanent profile for her knee * since receiving the permanent profile, she has taken and passed three record APFTs * she requested an ETP but the U.S. Army National Guard Bureau (NGB) denied her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000691

    Original file (20140000691.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her record to show an exception to policy (ETP) request was approved allowing her to retain the full amount of her non-prior service enlistment bonus (NPSEB). The evidence of record shows the only reason for terminating the applicant's NPSEB with recoupment was her second consecutive failure of the APFT in September 2011. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and State Army National Guard records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001414

    Original file (20150001414.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains an NGB 22-5 (Addendum to DD Form 4 - Approval and Acceptance by Service Representative for Interstate Transfer in the ARNG), dated 8 April 2008, wherein the applicant acknowledged having voluntarily transferred to the IDARNG with continued membership in the ARNG for the period remaining on his current enlistment, with ETS of 12 October 2012. Oregon Military Department, Joint Force Headquarters, Oregon National Guard, Orders 121-055, dated 30 April 2008, show the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007090

    Original file (20130007090.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Secretary of the Military Department concerned has the discretion to, at some point in the process, render a case-by-case determination that the member's repayment of or the Military Department's full payment of an unpaid portion of a pay or benefit is appropriate based on one or more of the following: * contrary to a personnel policy or management objective * against equity and good conscience * contrary to the best interest of the United States DISCUSSION AND...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150007743

    Original file (20150007743.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The BCN was requested after the date of entry; therefore, NGB cannot approve the ETP and the State Incentive Manager will terminate effective the contract starting date. Further, the first NGB decision to approve his request for an ETP stated, "A review of the agreement/addendum supports an incentive being offered at time of agreement/contact," contrary to the second review by NGB. Therefore, notwithstanding the second NGB decision and in view of the facts of this case, it would be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150009072

    Original file (20150009072.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In a memorandum, dated 3 February 2015, subject: Request for ETP for PSEB [applicant], the NGB denied the applicant's request for an ETP to retain the $15,000 bonus and directed recoupment effective the date of the second APFT failure. He was medically waived from the APFT * on 18 June 2013, he had a temporary profile of U3 since he was still recovering from his surgery; he was able to do the run portion of the APFT, but exempt from the sit-up and push-up portion of the test * on 10 April...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011903

    Original file (20130011903.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    (b) I understand that the AFQT score I receive from this AFCT will be counted as my final AFQT score of record, for which my continued eligibility will be determined. Eligibility for the NPSEB required a score of 31 or higher to receive the incentive. As a result, the Board recommends that all Army National Guard and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * showing the applicant was granted an ETP to accept the $20,000 NPSEB offered at the time of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008397

    Original file (20140008397.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence shows the request for ETP to retain the NPSEB was denied for the following reasons: * the applicant had nine or more periods of unsatisfactory service * he did not complete MOS training within the required time * he was not serving in the MOS for which he contracted 4. The evidence of record also shows: a. the applicant's attendance record was corrected in 2011 to show his unexcused absences in 2010 were excused; b. the 24-month training requirement violation was approved by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011280

    Original file (20130011280.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he is entitled to the Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) he contracted for at the time of his enlistment in the Kentucky Army National Guard (KYARNG). The advisory official recommended granting the applicant administrative relief and cancellation of his recoupment action, citing the following points: * the applicant contracted for a $20,000.00 NPSEB when he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008413

    Original file (20140008413.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Section V (Termination) of this addendum states "I understand that I may be terminated from bonus eligibility with recoupment for service of one year or less of an enlisted incentive contract term (contract term starts the date the initial payment of the bonus is authorized) before accepting a commission as an officer, appointment as a warrant officer, becoming a contracted Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) Cadet in the Simultaneous Membership Program (SMP), or accepting any ROTC...