Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008397
Original file (20140008397.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  29 January 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140008397 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he is authorized to retain his Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) offered at the time of his enlistment in the Wisconsin Army National Guard (WIARNG) on 16 February 2007.

2.  The applicant states, in effect:

	a.  He requested an exception to policy (ETP) for his Selected Reserve incentives contract, but it was denied.

	b.  His records were in error because his prior unit entered the incorrect attendance codes.  However, these attendance codes were subsequently corrected from unexcused absences to excused absences.

	c.  He was told his ETP was denied because his $15,000.00 debt was established before the attendance codes were corrected.

3.  The applicant provides:

* ETP denial letter
* memorandum from his commander, dated 9 September 2013
* Military Pay Voucher
* letter from a Member of Congress, dated 17 December 2014



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the WIARNG on 16 February 2007 for 8 years.  His NPSEB Addendum shows he enlisted for military occupational specialty (MOS) 19D (cavalry scout) and a bonus in the amount of $15,000.00.  The addendum states he would be paid the first bonus payment of 50 percent of the total authorized amount upon completion of initial active duty training (IADT) and the second and final payment of 50 percent would be paid on the 36-month anniversary of his date of enlistment.

2.  Section V (Termination) of this addendum states, "I understand that I will be terminated from bonus eligibility with recoupment if I become an unsatisfactory participant by accumulating 9 unexcused absences within a 12-month period effective on the date of the 9th unexcused absence."

3.  He completed IADT on 19 February 2009 and was awarded primary MOS 19D.  He was promoted to specialist effective 7 April 2010.

4.  He provided a Military Pay Voucher, dated 18 November 2011, which shows 12 unexcused unit training assemblies during the period 31 July 2010 to 12 September 2010 were excused by the applicant's commander due to hardship.

5.  He was honorably discharged from the WIARNG on 15 February 2013 and assigned to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training).

6.  He provided a memorandum from his commanding officer, dated 9 September 2013, subject:  Request for ETP, which states:

	a.  The purpose of this memorandum is to request an ETP.

	b.  The applicant was coded as absent without leave (AWOL) on the original DA Form 1379 (U.S. Army Reserve Components Unit Record of Reserve Training), but on 18 November 2011 a pay code correction was sent to the Military Pay Office changing the code from an unexcused absence code of "U" to an excused absence code of "A" due to hardship.

7.  He provided a memorandum from the National Guard Bureau, dated 11 April 2014, subject:  Second Review Request for ETP for NPSEB (Applicant), which states:

	a.  An ETP request to retain the $15,000.00 NPSEB is denied.

	b.  The applicant had nine or more periods of unsatisfactory service which violates ARNG Selective Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) Policy Number 
07-04.

	c.  The applicant did not complete MOS training within the required time which violates Title 10, U.S. Code, section 10105.

	d.  The applicant was not serving in the MOS for which he contracted which violates ARNG SRIP Policy Number 07-04.  His current MOS is 11B (infantryman).

	e.  The Department of the Army memorandum, dated 24 March 2014, for approval of the 24-month training requirement violation is approved and enclosed in the applicant's ETP record (this memorandum is not available).  The change in MOS is based on unit reorganization which does not violate the terms of the incentive.

	f.  Although the applicant's attendance record was corrected, the ETP was requested after the debt was established with the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS).  Since the debt has been established, the ARNG no longer has the authority to release the debt.

8.  Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation, volume 7A (Military Pay Policy and Procedures – Active Duty and Reserve Pay), chapter 2 (Repayment of Unearned Portion of Bonuses and Other Benefits), section 0201 (General Provisions), provides that a member of the Uniformed Services who enters into a written agreement with specified service conditions for receipt of a bonus, special or incentive pay, educational benefits, stipend, or similar payment (hereinafter referred to as "pay or benefit"), is entitled to the full amount of the pay or benefit if the member fulfills the conditions of that pay or benefit.  If the member fails to fulfill the service conditions specified in the written agreement for the pay or benefit, then the pay or benefit may be terminated and the member may be required to repay an amount equal to the unearned portion of the pay or benefit.  Such repayment will be pursued unless the member's failure to fulfill specified service conditions is due to circumstances determined reasonably beyond the member's control.  Conditions under which repayment will not be sought are set forth in section 0202.

9.  Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation, volume 7A, chapter 2, section 0202 (Repayment and Non-repayment Conditions), provides that, as a general rule, repayment action will not be pursued in situations in which the member's inability to fulfill specified service conditions related to a pay or benefit is due to circumstances determined reasonably beyond the member's control.  In addition, the Secretary of the Military Department concerned has the discretion to, at some point in the process, render a case-by-case determination that the member's repayment of, or the Military Department's full payment of an unpaid portion of, a pay or benefit is appropriate based on one or more of the following:

* contrary to a personnel policy or management objective
* against equity and good conscience
* contrary to the best interest of the United States

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he should be paid the NPSEB.

2.  The evidence confirms he enlisted in the WIARNG on 16 February 2007 for an NPSEB in the amount of $15,000.00.

3.  The evidence shows the request for ETP to retain the NPSEB was denied for the following reasons:

* the applicant had nine or more periods of unsatisfactory service
* he did not complete MOS training within the required time
* he was not serving in the MOS for which he contracted

4.  The evidence of record also shows:

	a.  the applicant's attendance record was corrected in 2011 to show his unexcused absences in 2010 were excused;

	b.  the 24-month training requirement violation was approved by the Department of the Army on 24 March 2014 (this memorandum is not available); and

	c.  the change in MOS was based on unit reorganization and did not violate the terms of the incentive.

5.  Based on the foregoing evidence, it appears he was eligible for the NPSEB bonus.  Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time and serve the interest of justice and equity to correct the applicant's records and pay him the NPSEB in the amount of $15,000.00.



BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and State ARNG records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  showing he was granted an ETP to retain the NPSEB in the amount of $15,000.00; and

	b.  paying him any portion of the NPSEB not already paid up to the amount of $15,000.00.



      _____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140008397



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140008397



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001608

    Original file (20150001608.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he is authorized to retain his Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) offered at the time of his enlistment in the Missouri Army National Guard (MOARNG) on 25 August 2010. Notwithstanding the NGB memorandum denying him an ETP to retain the NPSEB and in view of the facts of this case, it would be appropriate at this time and serve the interest of justice and equity to correct the applicant's records to show he requested and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008413

    Original file (20140008413.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Section V (Termination) of this addendum states "I understand that I may be terminated from bonus eligibility with recoupment for service of one year or less of an enlisted incentive contract term (contract term starts the date the initial payment of the bonus is authorized) before accepting a commission as an officer, appointment as a warrant officer, becoming a contracted Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) Cadet in the Simultaneous Membership Program (SMP), or accepting any ROTC...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150007743

    Original file (20150007743.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The BCN was requested after the date of entry; therefore, NGB cannot approve the ETP and the State Incentive Manager will terminate effective the contract starting date. Further, the first NGB decision to approve his request for an ETP stated, "A review of the agreement/addendum supports an incentive being offered at time of agreement/contact," contrary to the second review by NGB. Therefore, notwithstanding the second NGB decision and in view of the facts of this case, it would be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011403.

    Original file (20130011403..txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The opinion stated: * a review of the applicant's case shows he was denied both his bonus and SLRP because he did not complete training to become DMOSQ within 2 years of enlistment * he underwent an emergency surgery while at IADT that extended his training to 2 years and 7 days 6. The evidence confirms he enlisted in the PAARNG on 2 March 2010 for an NPSEB in the amount of $10,000.00 and the SLRP. He was denied both his NPSEB and the SLRP because he did not complete training to become MOS...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011403

    Original file (20130011403.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The opinion stated: * a review of the applicant's case shows he was denied both his bonus and SLRP because he did not complete training to become DMOSQ within 2 years of enlistment * he underwent an emergency surgery while at IADT that extended his training to 2 years and 7 days 6. The evidence confirms he enlisted in the PAARNG on 2 March 2010 for an NPSEB in the amount of $10,000.00 and the SLRP. He was denied both his NPSEB and the SLRP because he did not complete training to become MOS...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012701

    Original file (20130012701.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Director stated: * the MOS was not on the list of approved critical skills at the time of enlistment * a Bonus Addendum could not be found * a Bonus Control Number (BCN) was given which supported an incentive being offered at the time * a review of policy and her DD Form 4 supported an incentive being offered at the time 7. The advisory opinion further stated her DD Form 1966 and bonus addendum could not be found in her record, though her DD Form 4 supports an incentive being offered at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007090

    Original file (20130007090.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Secretary of the Military Department concerned has the discretion to, at some point in the process, render a case-by-case determination that the member's repayment of or the Military Department's full payment of an unpaid portion of a pay or benefit is appropriate based on one or more of the following: * contrary to a personnel policy or management objective * against equity and good conscience * contrary to the best interest of the United States DISCUSSION AND...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013666

    Original file (20130013666.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, amendment of the termination date of his Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) from 10 July 2012 to 21 December 2012. The start date for the recoupment period was 10 July 2012, the date he was first flagged, even though he was discharged on “17 November 2012.” He was told by the State Incentive Manager that he owed from the actual discharge date and the amount was $1,100.11. Item 11 (Terminal Date of Reserve/Military Service Obligation) lists a date...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014514

    Original file (20130014514.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). His NPSEB Addendum shows he enlisted for a bonus in the amount of $20,000.00. was accepted and he was recognized as a high school graduate at the time of his enlistment; b. showing the appropriate authority cancelled any recoupment action; and c. paying him from Army National Guard funds any portion of the NPSEB not already paid, to the amount of $20,000.00.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001331

    Original file (20140001331.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    (1) The Request for ETP was denied for the following discrepancies: * the applicant was not DMOSQ for the contracted incentive * incentive addendum contains a missing signature from the enlisting official * the applicant was paid on unauthorized loans (2) It also shows the applicant was not DMOSQ for MOS 88M upon enlistment and that he completed training for MOS 88M on 6 September 2008. Records show the applicant enlisted in the MNARNG on 8 April 2006 for a period of 6 years and his...