Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001688
Original file (20150001688.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:    

		BOARD DATE:  27 October 2015	 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150001688 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show he was authorized the Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR) and the Army Service Ribbon (ASR).  He also requests a promotion to master sergeant (MSG)/E-8.

2.  The applicant states:

a. He believes that the circumstances that resulted in his placement on the 
permanent disability list should allow him to be retired at the MSG/E-8 rank.

b. He reported numerous times to the hospital over 3 years from 1974 
to 1977, complaining of symptoms that were initially dismissed as minimal concern.  He had pain, bloody stools and a general feeling of fear; he was treated for hemorrhoids.

c. Eventually, the pain was so bad that he went to an Army hospital, was 
diagnosed with severe ulcerative colitis, and was told he had a 20 percent chance of survival.

d. He was medically retired on 21 March 1978, and began to start his life
over again.

e. He harbors no ill feelings against those charged with his medical care for 
their failure to diagnose him sooner, but he resents them from taking away the only career he had ever known.  He enlisted with the intention of serving no less than 20 years.

f. He believes based on his early military accomplishments and recognition 
while in the Army, had he stayed in, he would have made MSG/E-8.

g. Presently, he receives disability compensation from the Department of 
Veterans Affairs at a rate of 100 percent for ulcerative colitis, Agent Orange related chronic lymphocytic leukemia and post-traumatic stress disorder.  

h. These requests are appropriate and he would appreciate consideration to 
be advanced on the retired list to MSG/E-8 and authorization to wear the ASR and OSR.

3.  The applicant provides:

* a self-authored letter
* DD Form 214
* DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214)
* Letter of recommendation for promotion to MSG/E-8 dated 27 May 1977
* Retirement Orders effective 20 March 1978
* Military Awards
* Civilian Awards
* Page 3 of DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record)
* DA Form 2166 (Enlisted Efficiency Report)
* Articles from his book, “Veterans’ Reflections- History Preserved”

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant had prior Regular Army service and reenlisted on 
31 March 1976.  

3.  Orders D45-23, Department of the Army, U.S. Army Military Personnel Center, Alexandria VA, dated 6 March 1978, show that on 20 March 1978, he was retired due to disability.  

4.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows he had 12 years, 8 months and 15 days of total active duty service.

5.  The applicant’s record is void of documentation to show he was selected for promotion to MSG/E-8.  

6.  The applicant has provided a copy of his promotion recommendation to MSG/E-8 from his executive officer, dated 27 May 1977.  In addition, he provides records of awards he received while in the military and post-service.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual and unit military awards.

	a.  The ASR was established by the Secretary of the Army on 10 April 1981.  Effective 1 August 1981, all members of the Active Army, Army National Guard, and Army Reserve in an active Reserve status are eligible for the award upon successful completion of initial entry training.  The award may be awarded retroactively to those personnel who completed the required training before 
1 August 1981 provided they had an Active Army status on or after 
1 August 1981.

	b.  The OSR was established by the Secretary of the Army on 10 April 1981.  Effective 1 August 1981, all members of the Active Army, Army National Guard, and Army Reserve in an active Reserve status are eligible for the award for successful completion of overseas tours.  The OSR may be awarded retroactively to those personnel who were credited with a normal overseas tour completion before 1 August 1981 provided they had an Active Army status on or after 1 August 1981.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The circumstances leading to the applicant's retirement were unfortunate; however, in the absence of documentation showing he was actually selected for promotion to MSG/E-8, these circumstances do not form a basis for correcting his record to show he was promoted to that rank/grade.  

2.  The OSR and the ASR were not established until 1981, after his release from active duty service.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X____________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140005906



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150001688



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001627C070205

    Original file (20060001627C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be advanced on the retired list to the rank of master sergeant (MSG), E-8. There are no orders in the applicant’s service records which show he was promoted to MSG. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 3961(b) states that, unless entitled to a higher retired grade under some other provision of law, a Regular or Reserve of the Army not covered by section 3961a) (which discusses commissioned officers) who retires other than for physical disability retires...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9506266C070209

    Original file (9506266C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That her records be corrected to show that her separation was based on a physical disability. EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military and medical records show: On 29 April 1981, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army and continued through reenlistments until her separation. The VA, however, is not required by law to determine medical unfitness for further military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002182C070206

    Original file (20050002182C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was medically retired in error by a doctor who determined he had ulcerative colitis. The evaluating physician noted the applicant was 27 years old, and had complained of bloody diarrhea with four or five bowel movements a day in December 1996. There is no medical evidence supporting the applicant's contention that his tobacco use was the cause of the medical condition which resulted in his retirement by reason of physical disability.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012498

    Original file (20100012498.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he had several flare-ups due to ulcerative colitis from 1999 until March of 2003. Army Regulation 140-10 (Assignments, Attachments, Details, and Transfers) states an officer (other than a commissioned WO) or enlisted Soldier who has accrued 20 years of qualifying service for retired pay is required to attain 50 points annually to be retained in an active status in the Selected Reserve, IRR, or Standby Reserve (Active List). In order to be credited with satisfactory...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014458

    Original file (20060014458.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, his record is in error because he does not have ulcerative colitis, a lifetime disease, which would keep him from serving in the Army. He further states that his doctor told him that tobacco did not cause his ulcerative colitis. The evidence shows that the applicant was diagnosed and treated for the ulcerative colitis.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001333

    Original file (20120001333.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also states he believes that he should be awarded the ASR for his 11 months of service. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Army Service Ribbon is awarded to those personnel who complete the required initial entry training for award of a military occupational specialty (MOS) other than a training MOS. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application and the evidence of record that he completed his initial entry training as an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058405C070421

    Original file (2001058405C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 3 December 1998, the soldier submitted a DA Form 4187 requesting retirement on 1 September 1999, which reflects that he intended to retire with 22 years of AFS. The opinion further states that the applicant was aware for over 4 months before retirement that he would not have 22 years of AFS at his requested retirement date, and while soldiers are authorized to request change or withdrawal of an approved retirement, there is no evidence that the applicant requested to change or withdraw...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010372

    Original file (20110010372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's contentions that his retired grade should be colonel/O-6 instead of lieutenant colonel/O-5 and that he was unaware he had been transferred to the Retired Reserve until March 2010 were carefully considered and determined to lack merit. Additionally, there is no substantive evidence showing he was referred to a medical evaluation board at the time of his transfer to the Retired Reserve. His major surgery was not performed until 2 years after his transfer to the Retired...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004371

    Original file (20090004371.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect awards of the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM), the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM), the Army Service Ribbon (ASR), the Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR), and the Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon (NCOPDR). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states that the KDSM is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have served on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017971

    Original file (20110017971.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), Army Service Ribbon (ASR), and Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR). Therefore, he is not entitled to have his records corrected to show award of the ASR. Therefore, he is not entitled to have his records corrected to show award of the OSR.