RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 7 September 2006
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060001627
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Ms. Beverly A. Young | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Ms. Susan Powers | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. Jonathan Rost | |Member |
| |Mr. David Haasenritter | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be advanced on the retired
list to the rank of master sergeant (MSG), E-8.
2. The applicant states he served as a First Sergeant (1SG) in the Combat
Support Company, 1st Battalion, 40th Armor at Fort Polk, Louisiana for over
a year. He states he was on the E-8 promotion list in early 1978, but he
retired in May 1978. He also states there were 3200 names on the E-8
promotion list, and he was number 1241 on the promotion list.
3. The applicant provides a letter from the commanding officer of the 5th
Infantry Division, Fort Polk, Louisiana; an article from the Army Echoes,
Issue 3, 1999; and his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States
Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 31 May 1978.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on 31 May 1978. The application submitted in this case is dated
25 January 2006.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. After having had prior service in the U.S. Army Reserve, the applicant
enlisted in the Regular Army on 16 December 1958. He was discharged on
15 December 1961 at the expiration of his term of service. He reenlisted
on 16 December 1961 and continued to serve on active duty through a series
of reenlistments.
4. Headquarters, 25th Infantry Division, Special Orders Number 70, dated
11 March 1970, promoted the applicant to sergeant first class (SFC) with an
effective date of 6 March 1970.
5. His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he was laterally
appointed to Platoon Sergeant on 6 March 1970.
6. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) on the applicant’s DA Form 2-1 shows he
served as a 1SG from 15 August 1977 to 9 September 1977 with the Combat
Support Company, 1st Battalion, 40th Armor at Fort Polk, Louisiana.
7. In a 27 February 1978 letter, the commanding officer of the 5th
Infantry Division (Mechanized) and Fort Polk, congratulated the applicant
on his recent selection for promotion to MSG.
8. There are no orders in the applicant’s service records which show he
was promoted to MSG.
9. On 17 April 1978, the applicant applied for voluntary retirement to be
effective 31 May 1978. Orders were issued on 18 April 1978 releasing him
from active duty effective 31 May 1978 and placing him on the retired list
the date following in the rank of SFC.
10. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the
separation of enlisted personnel. In pertinent part, it provides that
retired Soldiers, when their active service plus service on the retired
list total 30 years, are entitled to be advanced on the retired list to the
highest grade in which they satisfactorily served on active duty. When
these Soldiers complete 30 years of service, their military personnel
records are reviewed to determine whether service in the higher grade was
satisfactory.
11. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 3961(b) states that, unless entitled to a
higher retired grade under some other provision of law, a Regular or
Reserve of the Army not covered by section 3961a) (which discusses
commissioned officers) who retires other than for physical disability
retires in the Regular or Reserve grade that he holds on the date of his
retirement.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. It appears the applicant was selected for promotion to MSG on an
unknown date and was congratulated on his selection for promotion in
February 1978.
2. There are no orders which show the applicant was ever promoted to MSG.
3. The applicant applied for retirement in April 1978. Orders were
published on 18 April 1978 which shows he was retired on 31 May 1978 and
placed on the retired list in the rank of SFC. The applicant elected to
retire even though he had been selected for promotion to MSG.
4. By statute, an enlisted Soldier who retires for length of service
retires in the grade that he holds on the date of his retirement. The
applicant held the rank and grade of SFC, E-7 on the date of his
retirement. Regrettably, since he never held the rank of MSG, he is not
entitled to be advanced to MSG on the retired list.
5. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 1 June 1978; therefore, the time for
the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice
expired on 31 May 1981. The applicant did not file within the 3-year
statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or
evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
failure to timely file in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
SP______ JR______ DH______ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
2. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's
failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of
limitations prescribed by law. Therefore, there is insufficient basis to
waive the statute of
limitations for timely filing or for correction of the records of the
individual concerned.
Susan Powers__________
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20060001627 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON |YYYYMMDD |
|DATE BOARDED |20060907 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE |YYYYMMDD |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY |AR . . . . . |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |DENY |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY |Mr. Chun |
|ISSUES 1. |129.0400 |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013890
The applicant's records also show he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) for a period of 3 years on 28 December 1960 and was honorably discharged on 16 April 1963 in the rank/grade of sergeant/E-5 for the purpose of immediate reenlistment. Item 35 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record (PQR)) shows he performed the following duties: a. The applicant's records also show a copy of his PQR was forwarded to the U.S. Army Enlisted Records and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003337
Title 10, U. S. Code, provides, in pertinent part, that enlisted personnel may be advanced in grade to the highest grade satisfactorily held, as determined by the Secretary of the Army, upon completing 30 years of service. The applicant has not submitted evidence with his application, and the evidence of record does not contain any evidence to show that he was properly promoted to a higher grade than he held at the time of retirement. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005773
In order to support a change to the applicant's grade at the time of retirement or his advancement on the Retired List, there must be evidence that the applicant completed the satisfactory service requirement to complete 2 years of active duty service in the higher grade of MSG. Further, the evidence of record and independent evidence submitted by the applicant while showing he was twice promoted to 1SG/MSG and twice administratively reduced to SFC, not due to his own misconduct, while...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010662
The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request that his rank be corrected from Sergeant First Class (SFC)/E-7 to First Sergeant (1SG)/E-8. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20060003438, on 28 September 2006. There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant did not provide any...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008880
The applicant states: * he was fully qualified to be considered for promotion by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 MSG Promotion Selection Board; however, he was not considered for promotion to MSG because he was under an erroneous flagging action * he was approved for consideration by the next Department of the Army (DA) Enlisted Standby Advisory Board (STAB), which convened 29 January 2008 * he strongly believes the STAB selected him for promotion; however, since the erroneous flag was not removed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026331
The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was placed on the Retired List in pay grade E-8. An ARNG Retirement Points History Statement, prepared on 17 August 2007, shows his highest grade held as E-8. Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions), paragraph 7-14e, provides that concurrent with separation from the ARNG and transfer to the Retired Reserve or placement on the Retired List, Soldiers will be retired at the highest enlisted grade satisfactorily...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022487
The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous request for correction of his records to show he was promoted to the grade and rank of master sergeant (MSG)/E-8. The previous Record of Proceedings concluded the evidence of record showed the applicant was promoted to SFC on 1 September 1998 and although the Commanding General, 82nd Airborne Division, issued him a congratulatory letter on 15 September 1997 and addressed him as an MSG, the letter incorrectly listed his rank. The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019211
The Soldier must be serving in and retiring in the grade of MSG. The applicant held the rank of MSG, not 1SG, on his last day of active duty. His DD Form 214 correctly reflects the rank and grade he held at the time of retirement.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007328
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 31 August 1987 to show he retired as a first sergeant (1SG)/E-8. The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he was promoted to MSG with a date of rank of 20 July 1985. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 12 (Retirement for Length of Service), paragraph 12-17 (Grade title on retired list of former...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014653
The applicant provides a 26 March 2004 statement and summary of her actions, a 2002 duty appointment memorandum, a list of personnel, a December 2002 Noncommissioned Officers Evaluation Report (NCOER), January 2004 release from active duty orders, February 2004 mobilization orders, February 2004 deployment orders, November 2004 active duty orders, a December 2004 NCOER, a December 2004 edition of "The 3rd Word" newsletter, a 2005 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active...