Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001142
Original file (20150001142.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  22 September 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150001142 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show both of his reenlistment periods vice showing only his immediate reenlistment as 19 May 2008 to 14 June 2012.

2.  The applicant states during his service in the military he reenlisted twice.  The first reenlistment was on 19 May 2007 (i.e., 2008) and the second was on 2 February 2009.  However, only his first reenlistment is shown on his DD Form 214.  Although he was discharged under honorable conditions in 2012, he had never been in trouble during the rest of his career in the military.  Unfortunately, he got in trouble during a mass draw-down [of the Army].  His second reenlistment shows evidence of honorable service exceeding 24 months and qualifies him to receive his GI Bill education benefits. 

3.  The applicant provides a DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document - Armed Forces of the United States), dated 2 February 2009, and four certificates.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 16 November 2006.  He was subsequently assigned to the 632nd Maintenance Company, 87th Combat Sustainment Support Battalion (CSSB), Fort Stewart, GA.  

2.  He served in Iraq while assigned to the 632nd Maintenance Company from 26 October 2007 to 26 January 2009.  His record contains a DD Form 4, dated 19 May 2008, wherein it shows he reenlisted on that date in the RA for a period of 2 years at the 632nd Maintenance Company, 87th CSSB, Iraq.  This form also shows he was reenlisting for the current station option and it was his 1st reenlistment.

3.  The applicant provides, and his record contains, a DD Form 4, dated 2 February 2009, wherein it shows he reenlisted on that date in the RA for a period of 4 years at the 632nd Maintenance Company, 87th CSSB, Fort Stewart, GA.

4.  He was subsequently assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Detachment (HHD), 192nd Ordnance Battalion (OD), Fort Bragg, NC.

5.  He was discharged under honorable conditions on 14 June 2012 at Fort Bragg, NC.  Item 18 (Remarks) of the DD Form 214 he was issued, in part, contains the entry “IMMEDIATE REENLISTMENTS THIS PERIOD -- 20080519-20120614.”

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) then in effect, prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states, in part, for Soldiers with more than one enlistment period during the time covered by the DD Form 214, in item 18 enter “IMMEDIATE REENLISTMENTS THIS PERIOD” and specify inclusive dates for each period of reenlistment.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence of record confirms the applicant reenlisted in the RA on 19 May 2008 and 2 February 2009 while his DD Form 214 only shows one period of his reenlistment.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show his immediate reenlistments as 19 May 2008 to 1 February 2009 and 2 February 2009 to 14 June 2012. 

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 18 of his DD Form 214 by:

* deleting the entry “IMMEDIATE REENLISTMENTS THIS PERIOD -- 20080519-20120614”
* adding the entry “IMMEDIATE REENLISTMENTS THIS PERIOD -- 20080519-20090201 and 20090202-20120614”



      ___________x______________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150001142





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150001142



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090008572

    Original file (AR20090008572.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade:...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014544

    Original file (AR20100014544.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 July 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009470

    Original file (20130009470.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided three UMRs, dated 2 June 2010, 24 August 2010, and 16 July 2011, which show: a. MSG CJ also stated that the applicant must complete the attached counseling and, by 27 May 2012, be reassigned to a valid position that meets COE and grade requirements or be subject to involuntary transfer to another unit, to the IRR, or elect retirement. (i) As a COE (MILTECH 365th) and in order to meet the senior grade overstrength guidance, she took a reduction in rank from SGM/E-9 to...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100021765

    Original file (AR20100021765.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025268

    Original file (20110025268.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states: * according to Executive Order 8809, any active duty Soldier who completes 3 consecutive years of honorable service and who did not receive nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) will be awarded this medal * he completed over 3 years of honorable service, but he was not awarded this medal * 5 days after his 3-year mark, he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008727

    Original file (20130008727.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was promoted to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 prior to placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). The applicant provides: * DA Form 2339 (Application for Voluntary Retirement) * Enlisted Record Brief (ERB) * a memorandum, subject: Grade Determination Request (applicant's name), dated 5 November 2012 * 2 pages of a Recommended List for Promotion of Enlisted Personnel, as of 5 October 2012 * DD Form 214WS...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080007861

    Original file (AR20080007861.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 12 February 2007, the unit commander notified the Applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—for failure to be at her appointed place of duty, missing movement, disobeying lawful orders on numerous occasions and disrespecting NCOs on numerous occasionss, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 14 February 2007, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005329

    Original file (20130005329.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his appointment date and date of rank (DOR) as a first lieutenant (1LT) in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) from 15 January 2013 to 1 January 2013. The error was discovered in January 2013 and at that time his name was submitted for scroll approval. However, the ABCMR does have the authority to amend appointment and assignment orders of Army officers.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110004300

    Original file (AR20110004300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander and intermediate commander's recommended approval of an under other than honorable conditions discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012279

    Original file (20130012279.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provided a memorandum from the 191st CSSB, dated 27 December 2012, subject: Promotion Board Proceedings for Promotion to SGT and SSG, recommending the applicant for promotion to SGT. HRC memorandum for U.S. Army Promotion Work Centers, dated 22 February 2013, subject: Department of the Army Promotion Point Cutoff Scores for 1 March 2013 and Junior Enlisted Issues, announcing promotion point cutoff scores for 1 March 2013. a. He provided a copy of his email to HRC, dated 3 June 2013,...