Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000396
Original file (20150000396.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  17 September 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150000396 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests adjustment of his date of rank (DOR) to captain (CPT) from 1 July 2013 to 15 July 2012.

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  His unit vacancy promotion (UVP) packet was submitted to the Tennessee Army National Guard (TNARNG) on 25 July 2012 prior to publication of the Department of the Army (DA) Selection Board results.  The UVP packet was returned by the State on 27 July 2013 without further processing.  The stated reason was the packet missed the 90-day cut-off window when, in fact, the packet was within at least 96 days.

	b.  He took command on 15 July 2012.  He initially received State promotion orders to CPT effective 21 June 2012, but these orders were revoked because the UVP packet was not received within the 90-day window before the DA selection list was published when, in fact, it was at least 96 days prior to the board schedule being published.

	c.  This resulted in his promotion packet going before the 29 October 2012 DA promotion board.  The results of this board were delayed for over 6 months due to administrative issues which resulted in an effective DOR of 1 July 2013.

3.  The applicant provides:

* UVP packet
* Officer Record Brief
* promotion orders, dated 29 July 2013
* DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record), dated 2 August 2013
* email correspondence
* sworn statement

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Having prior enlisted service in the U.S. Navy, the applicant enlisted in the TNARNG on 9 March 2006.  He was discharged on 8 March 2007 to accept appointment as a commissioned officer.  He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the TNARNG on 9 March 2007.  He was promoted to first lieutenant effective 9 September 2008.

2.  Records show he assigned as Commander, 777th Maintenance Company, in Smyrna, TN, on 15 July 2012.

3.  On 25 July 2012, he submitted a UVP packet.

4.  TNARNG Orders 219-812, dated 6 August 2012, promoted him to CPT effective 21 June 2012.  These orders were revoked on 29 September 2012.

5.  TNARNG Orders 210-811, dated 29 July 2013, promoted him to CPT effective 1 July 2013.

6.  He provided a sworn statement from a staff sergeant assigned to the 176th Combat Sustainment Support Battalion, Johnson City, TN, dated 30 July 2013, who states:

	a.  The applicant assumed command on 15 July 2012.

	b.  He completed a UVP packet for the applicant and forwarded it for processing on 25 July 2012.

	c.  On 27 July 2012, he was informed that the applicant had been selected to go before the DA Board in October 2012 and that the U.S. Army Human Resources Command had released the DA Board schedule late but would not adjust their 90-day policy.

	d.  Due to this reason, the applicant's UVP packet was returned and he was instructed to build a promotion packet for the DA Board.

	e.  The original DA Board was scheduled for 29 October 2012, 96 calendar days from when the UVP packet was submitted.

	f.  He completed the DA board packet and returned it to the applicant the same day.

	g.  On 6 August 2012, the TNARNG published orders promoting the applicant to CPT effective 21 June 2012.

	h.  On 21 September 2012, revocation orders were published.

	i.  At some point the DA board was delayed.

	j.  This caused the applicant's effective date of promotion to CPT to be pushed all the way to 1 July 2013.

	k.  It was not the fault of the applicant or of his chain of command that he missed out on a year of time in grade and the pay that coincides with it.

7.  National Guard Bureau (NGB) Special Orders Number 200 AR, dated 8 August 2013, extended him Federal recognition for promotion to the grade of CPT effective 1 July 2013.

8.  In the processing of this case, a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Personnel Policy Division, NGB.  NGB recommends disapproval of the applicant's request.  The opinion stated:

	a.  The applicant requests his promotion date to CPT be concurrent with his assignment as a company commander on 15 July 2012.

	b.  The Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 DA Reserve Component Board Schedule, dated 14 June 2012 (change 3), established a 1 July 2012 deadline to submit UVP packets for Soldiers eligible for consideration by the FY13 DA Board.

	c.  On 15 July 2012, he was assigned as a company commander.

	d.  On 25 July 2012, he submitted a UVP packet that was signed by the commander for processing.

	e.  On 6 August 2012, the TNARNG issued orders erroneously promoting him to CPT effective 21 June 2012 based on a UVP.  These orders were revoked on 29 September 2012 because he was not eligible for a UVP.

	f.  The DA Board convened on 29 October 2012 and adjourned on 8 November 2012.

	g.  On 1 July 2013, he received orders promoting him to CPT effective 29 July 2013.

	h.  On 8 August 2013, he received Federal recognition orders for promotion to CPT effective 1 July 2013.

	i.  The NGB Federal Recognition Section reviewed	his processing history which shows his UVP was submitted after the suspense date, not processed, and returned to the TNARNG.  The submission of the UVP packet was less than 90 days out, which automatically sent him to his required zoned FY13 DA Board. 
Further, being assigned to a position of higher rank doesn't ensure an automatic promotion.

	j.  There was a 6-month delay in the Federal recognition proceedings and results due to administrative issues.  The delay has no bearing on his eligibility for promotion because no promotion of any type is official until the promotion list is approved by the Secretary of Defense.  The Federal recognition orders, dated 8 August 2013, with an effective date of 1 July 2013 stand.

	k.  The TNARNG indicates no adjustment is warranted.

9.  A copy of the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for comment and possible rebuttal.  He did not respond.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests adjustment of his DOR to CPT from 1 July 2013 to 15 July 2012.

2.  The evidence confirms:

	a.  The FY13 DA Reserve Component Board Schedule established a 1 July 2012 deadline to submit UVP packets for Soldiers eligible for consideration by the FY13 DA Board.

	b.  The applicant assumed command on 15 July 2012.

	c.  After the suspense date to submit UVP packets, he submitted a UVP on 25 July 2012.  His submission of a UVP packet was less than 90 days out, which automatically sent him to his required zoned FY13 DA Board.

	d.  He was erroneously promoted to CPT effective 21 June 2012 based on a UVP, but these orders were revoked because he was not eligible for a UVP.

	e.  He was promoted to CPT effective 1 July 2013.

3.  The NGB advisory opinion notes there was a 6-month delay in the Federal recognition proceedings and results due to administrative issues.  However, the delay has no bearing on his eligibility for promotion because no promotion of any type is official until the promotion list is approved by the Secretary of Defense.

4.  Based on the foregoing evidence, there is an insufficient basis to grant the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150000396





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150000396



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020955

    Original file (20140020955.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His packet was submitted in July 2012 with the New Mexico State Recognition Board results, dated 20 July 2012, and State Orders for promotion, dated 26 July 2012. The applicant provides copies of the following: * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board (FREB)) * Orders Number 208-004 * FY 2013 DA Reserve Component Board Schedule * Special Orders (SO) Number 137 AR * two emails * Suspense for Submission of Applications for the Federal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013213

    Original file (20140013213.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, adjustment of her date of rank (DOR) to captain (CPT) to an earlier DOR the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) considers to be reasonable and fair. The Reserve Officer Promotion Act states, "The effective date of promotion and date of rank of an officer who is promoted under the position vacancy system is the date the Chief, NGB, extends Federal recognition. The applicant contends her DOR for promotion to CPT in the CAARNG should be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012647

    Original file (20130012647.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests adjustment of her effective date of promotion to captain (CPT) in the Michigan Army National Guard (MIARNG) from 2 May 2013 to 3 July 2012. The applicant provides: * Orders 238-002 for appointment in the ARNG * DA Form 5074-1-R (Record of Award of Entry Grade Credit – Health Services Officer) * Orders 035-32904 for promotion to CPT * BOLC Diploma * promotion memorandum CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant was appointed as a 1LT in the MIARNG on 18 August 2011...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016876

    Original file (20130016876.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The date her Federal recognition/ promotion packet was forwarded to the NGB is not of record. NGB Special Orders Number 200 AR, dated 8 August 2013, granted the applicant Federal recognition as a CPT with an effective date and DOR of 18 July 2013. In as much as the applicant could not be considered for Federal recognition based on unit vacancy promotion until after the mandatory board had announced its findings, this in effect meant that the effective date of her promotion could not have...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004378

    Original file (20120004378.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains a memorandum, subject: Recommendation for Promotion of MAJ (applicant's name), dated 10 February 2012, which contains the following: * under the provisions of chapter 8, National Guard Regulation 600-100 (Commissioned Officers-Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions), recommend the applicant be promoted in the ARNG * in the grade of LTC/O-5, UIC W39LAA, paragraph 052, line 01, Chief, Operations and Training * the officer has demonstrated the required fitness for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015866

    Original file (20110015866.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The applicant's records show: a. he was appointed in the Georgia Army National Guard (GAARNG) on 19 November 2003; b. he was assigned to lieutenant authorized positions from the date of his appointment to 31 December 2006; c. he was assigned to a captain position as commander, D Company, 2nd Battalion, 121st...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010295

    Original file (20140010295.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    An advisory opinion was received from the National Guard Bureau (NGB) on 9 June 2014 in the processing of this case. Following timelines of events were: * on 21 January 2001, the applicant was honorably separated from the Army on a DD Form 214 * From 22 January 2001 through 31 May 2002, the applicant's ARNG Current Annual Statement indicated he was in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) * on 1 June 2002, he was appointed as a 1LT in the ILARNG on NGB Form 337 (Oaths of Office) and DA Order...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002710

    Original file (20140002710.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    (3) on 17 July 2007, the applicant was recommended for promotion by the Commander of the PAARNG. The Reserve Officer Promotion Act states, "The effective date of promotion and date of rank of an officer promoted under the vacancy system is the date the Chief, National Guard Bureau extends Federal recognition. The applicant contends his DOR for promotion to CPT should be adjusted from 29 November 2007 to 17 August 2006, when he first became eligible for promotion to CPT.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015535

    Original file (20130015535.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states the Pennsylvania Army National Guard (PAARNG) failed to advise him that college transcripts were required as part of the Unit Vacancy Promotion (UVP) packet. The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show he was promoted to CPT (O-3) effective and with a DOR of 17 May 2012 because the PAARNG failed to advise him that college transcripts were required as part of the UVP packet. Records show the applicant was properly promoted and granted FEDREC of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013547

    Original file (20140013547.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records contain an NGB Form 62E (Application for Federal Recognition as an ARNG Officer or Warrant Officer and Appointment as a Reserve Commissioned Officer or Warrant Officer of the Army in the ARNG of the United States), dated 27 February 2010, which shows she requested Federal recognition and appointment in the ARNG as a 1LT Judge Advocate (JA). (5) On 5 May 2014, the applicant received a corrected date for Federal recognition to 1LT effective 1 October 2010. c. The...