Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016876
Original file (20130016876.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  28 January 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130016876 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests adjustment of her date of rank (DOR) to captain (CPT) and effective date from 18 July 2013 to 20 August 2012 with retroactive pay and allowances.

2.  The applicant states she was selected for promotion by a unit vacancy board but due to administrative errors her packet was returned without action from the National Guard Bureau (NGB).  The established mandatory promotion board DOR of 18 July 2013 is inadequate and unfair. 

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* NGB Special Orders Number 282 AR, dated 17 December 2010
* 20 August 2012 NGB Form 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board) packet
* 17 July 2012 Unit Manning Report
* Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) Orders 258-502 
* PRARNG Orders 237-564
* 8 August 2013 NGB Special Orders Number 200 AR 
* 8 August 2013 NGB Promotion Memorandum 
* 6 pages of documents related to her education and training



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, currently a captain (CPT) in the PRARNG, received her initial appointment and Federal recognition as a first lieutenant in the Judge Advocate General's Corps with an effective date and DOR of 26 May 2009.

2.  The applicant went before a PRARNG Unit Vacancy Board and was selected for promotion to CPT.  The date of this board is not of record.

3.  PRARNG Orders 236-504, dated 23 August 2012, promoted her to CPT with an effective date and DOR of 20 August 2012.  The date her Federal recognition/ promotion packet was forwarded to the NGB is not of record.

4.  On 13 September 2012, the promotion packet was returned without action resulting in revocation of her unit vacancy promotion on 14 September 2012.

5.  The applicant was considered by a mandatory Department of the Army (DA) Fiscal Year 2013 (FY13) Reserve Component (RC) Selection Board, which convened on 29 October 2012, and was selected for promotion to CPT.  

6.  On 8 August 2013, the NGB notified the applicant of her selection for promotion to captain with an effective date and DOR of 18 July 2013.

7.  NGB Special Orders Number 200 AR, dated 8 August 2013, granted the applicant Federal recognition as a CPT with an effective date and DOR of 18 July 2013.

8.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Personnel Policy Division, NGB.  It was noted that the applicant's unit vacancy promotion occurred 71 days prior to the convening of the DA mandatory promotion board.  The policy for the suspense date for a Unit Vacancy Promotion packet to be submitted for Federal recognition is no less than 90 days prior to the convening of any DA mandatory board.  The scrolling process would not have been completed prior to the convening date of the mandatory board and National Guard Regulation 600-100 (Commissioned Officers - Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions), paragraph 8-7c precludes States from promoting officers who are being considered by a mandatory DA promotion board.  It was recommended that the applicant's request be denied.

9.  A copy of the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant.  There is no response from the applicant in the available records.

10.  ARNG Human Resources Command (HRC) Policy Memorandum Number 10-068 (Suspense for Submission of Applications for the Federal Recognition of Army National Guard Officers in a Higher Grade by way Unit Vacancy Promotion) states:

* promotion of an ARNG officer is accomplished by the State or Territory to which the officer is assigned
* Federal recognition of that promotion is facilitated by one of two specific board proceedings and boards may be convened –

* at the State level in connection with a unit vacancy promotion when an officer is being considered to fill a particular vacancy before (emphasis added) the officer is approaching their maximum time in grade, or
* convened by the Army HRC when a group of officers are approaching their maximum time in grade

* the Chief of the NGB is required to notify officers that they are in the zone of consideration for a mandatory board at least 90 days prior to the convening date of that board
* in order not to prejudice other officers scheduled to appear before the mandatory board unit vacancy promotion packets must be submitted 90 days prior the convening date of any DA mandatory promotion board
* requests for a waiver of the provisions based on the mere fact that compliance of the submission date may cause the Federal recognition of a deserving Soldier to be delayed will not be considered sufficient to obtain the waiver

11.  National Guard Regulation 600-100, paragraph 8-7c states "States will not promote a commissioned officer who is being considered by a HQDA Selection Board from the time the board convenes until its recommendations are announced."

12.  Title 10, U.S. Code (USC), section 14308(f), states the effective date of a promotion of a Reserve commissioned officer in the Army who is extended Federal recognition in the next higher grade in the ARNG shall be the date in which such Federal recognition in that grade is so extended.

13.  Title 10, USC, section 12203, provides that appointments of Reserve officers in the grades of LTC and below shall be made by the President.  This authority has been delegated to the Secretary of Defense via Section 1, Executive Order 13384, dated 27 July 2005.

14.  Based on advice from the Department of Justice, that law prohibits redelegation below the Secretary of Defense of the President's authority to appoint military officers, authority granted to the Secretaries of the Military Departments in Secretary of Defense memorandum, dated 9 December 1985, subject:  Redelegation of Authority Under Executive Order 12396, to appoint officers under Title 10, USC, section 642, in the grades of O-2 (1LT) and O-3 (CPT), was rescinded effective 1 July 2005.  All military appointments under Title 10, USC, section 12203, including original appointments, in the Reserve of the Army, Reserve of the Air Force, Naval Reserve, and Marine Corps Reserve, not previously approved by 30 June 2005, must also be submitted to the Secretary of Defense.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The PRARNG failed to process the applicant's unit vacancy promotion within a time frame that would have allowed for a Federal Recognition Board to review that promotion prior to the 90-day cutoff requirement for officers who are being considered by a DA mandatory board.

2.  Because the State unit vacancy promotion occurred only 71 days before the convening date of the mandatory board, the NGB acted properly in returning the Federal recognition packet without action.

3.  In as much as the applicant could not be considered for Federal recognition based on unit vacancy promotion until after the mandatory board had announced its findings, this in effect meant that the effective date of her promotion could not have been any earlier than the date of her Reserve promotion based on the mandatory board.

4.  Therefore, the resulting voidance of the unit vacancy promotion orders was proper and in compliance with regulation.

5.  While it is regrettable that the applicant was placed in this position, the fact that her promotion was delayed in order to comply with regulations is an insufficient reason to warrant relief. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________x______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130016876



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130016876



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022677

    Original file (20120022677.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: * correction of the date he was granted Federal recognition from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) to the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) * consideration by a mandatory promotion board under the fiscal year 2012 (FY12) criteria 2. The applicant states: * he was promoted to captain (CPT) on 15 August 2005 and reached his maximum years of service (7 years) for promotion consideration to major (MAJ) in August 2012 * his promotion packet was not submitted on time due...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011782

    Original file (20130011782.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, NGB recommended and the State concurred that the applicant was entitled to a vacancy promotion to CPT with a DOR and effective date of 9 January 2013. Based on the delays through no fault of his own, and the scrolls approved by the Secretary of Defense on 9 January 2013, as a matter of equity in this case, his records should be corrected to show he was extended Federal recognition and promoted to CPT in the SCARNG with a DOR and effective date of 9 January 2013 with entitlement...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019878

    Original file (20130019878.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his date of rank (DOR) and, in effect, his promotion effective date to captain (CPT) to read 17 July 2012. In support of the applicant's contentions his commanding officer confirms that the applicant was transferred to the CPT's position on 16 July 2012 and that he personally initiated the applicant's promotion action on 17 July 2012. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to changing his effective date of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012189

    Original file (20130012189.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of: * Georgia Army National Guard (GAARNG) Orders 077-221, dated 18 March 2009 * GAARNG assignment orders, dated 11 September 2009 * State promotion orders, dated 17 June 2010 * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Federal recognition Special Orders Number 142 AR, dated 2 July 2010 * NGB memorandum for The Adjutants General, dated 30 January 2004, subject: Promotion of Mobilized ARNG Officers Who are Selected for Promotion by a DA Mandatory Promotion Board * 22 pages of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014726

    Original file (20140014726.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    e. He was advised to request an SSB to be considered for promotion under the same criteria and instructions as the FY13 LTC APL RC PSB and later request the appropriate effective date from the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). These boards do not reconsider officers who were not considered or not selected by mandatory promotion boards that convened before 1 October 1996. b. Paragraph 3-19c states these boards are convened to correct/prevent an injustice to an officer or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019548

    Original file (20140019548.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A corrected DA Form 5074-1-R (Record of Award of Entry Grade Credit (Health Services Officers)) mistakenly gave her too much constructive credit and made her DOR for CPT effective prior to her completion of BOLC. c. Correcting the DOR to show her rank as CPT effective the day she graduated from BOLC will completely correct the records and allow her to progress normally through her Army career. If before the SSB process is completed she is removed from the Reserve Active Status List: (1)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018517

    Original file (20130018517.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his state promotion effective date was 31 July 2012 with his promotion packet being sent forward on 20 May 2012, however it still took until 6 November 2012 for his promotion to go through the process at the National Guard Bureau (NGB) and therefore his pay effective date (PED) and DOR was adjusted to 6 November 2012. With the change of statute the Army Board for Correction of Military Records no longer has the authority to correct the effective date of pay (PED). The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000045

    Original file (20120000045.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DOR should be adjusted due to the State G-1's failure to submit his Federal Recognition 90 days prior to the Army Promotion List (APL) mandatory promotion board. m. On 2 November 2010, the FY 2011 Captain APL Board convened and recommended him for promotion to captain on a published list, dated 3 March 2011. n. Based on law, regulation, and NGB policy, his PRARNG unit should have proceeded with the promotion process when he was selected for promotion by the vacancy promotion board. (5)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021087

    Original file (20130021087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states her DOR for CPT and MAJ should reflect the date the California Army National Guard (CAARNG) state promotion orders were effective and not the later date the Federal recognition orders were issued because officer promotions are a state function. (1) Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other than General Officers), paragraph 4-21b(2) states, "Unit officers selected by a mandatory board will have a promotion date and effective...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015739

    Original file (20110015739.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states the State order promoted him effective 1 March 2008 and the National Guard Bureau (NGB) policy states that as long as the officer meets all the requirements, the Federal recognition will grant the State promotion order effective date. NGB Memorandum Number 04-0025, dated 1 September 2004, Subject: Clarification of the Policy to promote DA (Department of the Army) Select Mobilized Officers at Maximum TIG, states in paragraph 3 that ARNG officers recommended for promotion...