Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021503
Original file (20140021503.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	
		BOARD DATE:	10 February 2015  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140021503 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy (ETP) for retention of the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive.

2.  The applicant states:

   a.  His ETP request for the SLRP was denied.  His SLRP is to be terminated with recoupment effective the contract start date.  Terminating his SLRP incentive with recoupment is an injustice to himself and his family.

   b.  In September 2011, he was on temporary mobilization augmentee orders and placed in a leave without pay (LWOP) status from the technician job he held. In January 2012, he made the decision to reenlist for 6 years.  He and his family made this decision in large part because of the SLRP incentive that he was advised he would be eligible for to repay over $37,000.00 in student loans.  He made the SLRP manager aware of his technician status.  The SLRP manager informed him that he would be eligible for this incentive because he was in an LWOP status.  To process his SLRP he was required to submit a Standard Form (SF) 50 (Notification of Personnel Action) showing his technician status.

   c.  This incentive has had a tremendous impact on the career path he has chosen and the financial decisions that his family has made over the past 3 years.  He has had civilian opportunities that he could have pursued and he could have simply resigned his technician position had he known he would not be eligible for the SLRP.  His family has made a budget and made life decisions such as purchasing a home based upon this incentive.  Terminating his SLRP incentive because of an error on the part of the State SLRP manager nearly 3 years after he was granted this incentive would be an injustice to him and his family.  A recoupment of prior SLRP payments would create a hardship for his family.  He has served honorably in the Army National Guard (ARNG) for over 13 years, deploying in support of state and federal missions because of the contracts he has signed.  Termination of his SLRP should not be allowed.

3.  The applicant provides copies of the following:

* Orders Number 223-008
* two SF 50 
* DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment)
* Annex L (SLRP Addendum, ARNG)
* Email from the Missouri ARNG (MOARNG) SLRP Manager
* Request for ETP for SLRP memorandum

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the MOARNG on 12 July 2001 and reenlisted on 10 August 2007.

2.  Orders Number 223-008, issued by Headquarters, MOARNG on 11 August 2011, ordered him to full-time ARNG duty – operational support from 15 September 2011 through 25 March 2012.

3.  He provided two copies of an SF 50, dated 24 September 2011, which shows on 27 September 2007 he accepted and held a financial services technician position, pay grade GS-8, with The Missouri Adjutant General in the Comptroller Division Pay and Examining Branch.  Effective the date of the SF 50 he was placed in an absent – uniform service status per Orders Number 223-008.

4.  On 17 January 2012, he extended his 2007 reenlistment in the MOARNG for 4 years and 5 months with a new expiration of term of service of 9 February 2018.  He executed and signed Annex L under the SLRP.  The Annex L stated in:

   a.  Section III (Acknowledgement) - Prior service or current ARNG service members (additional information) – "I am enlisting/reenlisting/extending for a term of service of not less than 6 years, for an SLRP incentive of up to $50,000.00."

   b.  Section VIII (Termination Without Recoupment) – "Commanders are responsible for initiating recoupment procedures whenever the member's eligibility to an incentive is terminated and recoupment is required.  When a commander is not in the chain of command of the Soldier, the incentives program manager will initiate recoupment procedures."

   c.  Section XIV (Certification by Service Representative) – contained the service representative's signature and an SLRP Control Number.

5.  He also provided copies of the following:

   a.  Email correspondence, dated 13 January 2012, wherein the MOARNG SLRP manager stated the applicant was authorized and approved for a total of 15 loans, with a total principal of $37,710.00, and a total interest of $771.00.  The total amount of repayment for qualifying loan(s) would not exceed $50,000.00.  He read the terms to the applicant so that the applicant understood them.

   b.  A Request for ETP for SLRP memorandum, dated 4 December 2014, wherein the Deputy G1, National Guard Bureau (NGB), advised the MOARNG of denial of the applicant's ETP to retain the $50,000.00 SLRP and that the State Incentive Manager would terminate the incentive with recoupment effective the contract start date.  The NGB official stated the applicant contracted for an incentive while in a military technician status which violated Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1205.21.  Although the applicant was performing active duty for operational support (ADOS), he was a permanent military technician in a LWOP status; therefore, not eligible to extend for an incentive and the request could not be granted.

6.  Title 37, U.S. Code, section 373, allows for the repayment of unearned portion of bonus, incentive pay, or similar benefit, and termination of remaining payments, when conditions of payment not met.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows orders were published ordering the applicant to full-time ARNG duty from 15 September 2011 through 25 March 2012.  On 24 September 2011, he was placed in an absence for uniform service status from his position as a military technician position per his ADOS orders.

2.  On 17 January 2014, he extended his enlistment in the MOARNG for an SLRP incentive.  In accordance with DoDI 1205.21 he was not eligible for the incentive because he was a permanent military technician on LWOP status while performing ADOS.  The NGB denied his request for an ETP because he did not meet eligibility criteria for the incentive under the Selected Reserve Incentives Program guidance and terminated the incentive with recoupment effective the contract start date.
3.  There is no evidence of record and he did not provide sufficient evidence showing he was not a permanent military technician at the time of his extension.  It is unfortunate that he thinks he was erroneously denied the SLRP; the documentation he provides does not show he was terminated from his military technician position prior to his ADOS.  He continued to hold the position of military technician; he just was not being paid during his period of full-time ARNG duty.

4.  There is no evidence of record and he has not shown that he was erroneously or unjustly denied the SLRP incentive and it was erroneously or unjustly recouped.  Therefore, without evidence to the contrary, the action taken by NGB to terminate the incentive appears to be proper.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ___X_____  __X__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________X______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140021503





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140021503



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014091

    Original file (20140014091.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The National Guard Bureau (NGB) denied his request for an ETP to retain his eligibility for the ELRP incentive because: * he contracted for the incentive while in a Military Technician (MilTech) status (Federal or State civilian) * accepting the ELRP incentive while a MilTech violates Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1205.21 (Reserve Component Incentive Programs Procedures) b. A statement, dated 30 July 2014, from the applicant's Retention NCO, which essentially states: * in August...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017726

    Original file (20140017726.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The new command in Washington for OCS denied his request to stay in phase 0 and this meant he needed to go to his fall-back unit. The applicant provides: * ETP SLRP denial letter * email correspondence from a Member of Congress * Enlisted Loan Repayment Program Addendum * service personnel records CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. On 10 September 2014, the NGB disapproved his request for an ETP to retain the $50,000.00 SLRP incentive and stated: * the State Incentive Manager will terminate the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019213

    Original file (20130019213.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: a. The applicant provides: * NGB memorandum, Subject: Request for ETP for SLRP, dated 23 September 2013 * NGB memorandum, Subject: Clarification of Continuing SLRP Benefits upon acceptance of an AGR and/or Military Technician Position, dated 14 September 2009 * ETP request * SLRP Addendum * email between the applicant and members of the Wisconsin Army National Guard (WIARNG) * two DA Forms 2475 and allied documents CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant accepted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019059

    Original file (20130019059.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides her NGB Form 600-7-5-R-E (SLRP Addendum ARNG of the United States), dated 1 March 2009, and her Requests for an Exception to Policy for SLRP NGB decision, dated 1 October 2013. The record shows that the applicant voluntarily requested transfer to the JFHQ-NC-HHD and this assignment was effective on 1 August 2009. Based on the available evidence the applicant terminated her SLRP when she transferred out of her contracted UIC; therefore, she is not entitled to relief...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001357

    Original file (20140001357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he was given an incorrect SLRP incentive addendum when he enlisted in the IAARNG * the addendum and National Guard Bureau (NGB) policy had changed 1 month before he enlisted * the injustice is that NGB decided to terminate the bonus with recoupment due to two consecutive Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) failures and won't pay on the past 3 years due to the incorrect bonus addendum he was given * his loans haven't been paid * the bonus addendum he was given does not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000946

    Original file (20140000946.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his request to correct his records to allow him to retain the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive offered at the time of his enlistment in the Washington Army National Guard (WAARNG) in 2011. On 10 September 2014, the NGB disapproved his request for an ETP to retain the $50,000.00 SLRP incentive and stated: * the State Incentive Manager will terminate the SLRP incentive with recoupment effective the contract start date * the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016824

    Original file (20140016824.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She provides: * NGB Form 600-7-1-R-E (Annex E to DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) Addendum ARNG of the United States) * Applicant's Exception to Policy (ETP) Requests for the SLRP, dated 16 June 2011 and 6 January 2014 * Statement of support, dated 6 January 2014 * Numerous email CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Annex E to the applicant's enlistment contract, NPSEB Addendum, shows she was also entitled to a $20,000 bonus for a 6-year...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014625

    Original file (20140014625.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides copies of the following: * NGB Form 600-7-5-R-E (Annex L to DD Form 4, SLRP Addendum, Army National Guard (ARNG)) * two self-authored statements * ETP memorandum * Memorandum for Record (MFR) * Request for ETP for SLRP memorandum CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. c. A Request for ETP for SLRP memorandum, dated 28 May 2014, wherein the NGB, Deputy G1, ARNG, advised the NCARNG of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014088

    Original file (20140014088.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show entitlement to the $50,000.00 Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive that she contracted for upon enlistment in the Army National Guard (ARNG). Records show the applicant enlisted in the ARNGUS/GAARNG (RFP in an ING status), on 30 June 2011, for a period of 1 year in MOS 12K and her enlistment agreement included the SLRP. The evidence of record also shows the NGB decision to deny the applicant's SLRP was based on her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015396

    Original file (20130015396.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the memorandum the NCO states that at the time of the applicant's reenlistment he was a qualified 15T. In his statement the applicant states he had been qualified at an AIT for MOS 15T. There is no available evidence showing the applicant was qualified in MOS 15V when he signed the reenlistment contract.