IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 2 July 2014
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130019213
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests his records be corrected to show he is authorized full participation in the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) or in the alternative, that the SLRP payments already received not be recouped.
2. The applicant states:
a. He contracted for the SLRP on 14 April 2008 and received a payment in 2009.
b. In April 2010, he accepted an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) position and the SLRP manager told him that he would keep the SLRP due to a memorandum published by the National Guard Bureau (NGB) in September 2009 allowing AGR Soldiers to keep the SLRP if they had already received at least one payment before accepting Title 32 AGR orders.
c. Due to mobilization preparation, he did not realize that a payment for 2010 had not been processed.
d. In 2011, he contacted SFC K and SSG Z to begin his fiscal year (FY) 2011 payment process. He and his lenders completed the required DD Forms 2475 (DOD Educational Loan Repayment Program Annual Application) and they were submitted to the education office and paid on 14 April 2011.
e. In April 2012, he again sent his completed DD Forms 2475 in for processing; however, nothing was done with them at the State level until August 2012 during the Guard Incentive Management System (GIMS) transition. At that time, he was informed that his SLRP was terminated due to being in the AGR.
f. SFC K told him to wait to contact the education office until the GIMS transition was completed in case it was just an error. In November 2012, he called SSG Z, (the State Incentives Manager) about his status and he was told that nothing could be done about his situation until an administrative correction function was added to GIMS. In January 2013, the request for administrative correction was submitted but it was returned without action.
g. He was notified he was terminated from SLRP participation and that he had to request an exception to policy (ETP). He is fulfilling his obligations in order to keep the SLRP according to the NGB memorandum in 2009 and he has been proactive in ensuring his payments were processed.
h. He requested an ETP to allow him to keep the SLRP. However, the NGB denied his request and instead they stated that he must pay back all previous payments. He received payments for FY 2012 and 2013. He is requesting the NGB decision be reversed and that he be allowed to continue with the SLRP (which is what he was originally told) or at a minimum that the recoupment processes be terminated.
3. The applicant provides:
* NGB memorandum, Subject: Request for ETP for SLRP, dated
23 September 2013
* NGB memorandum, Subject: Clarification of Continuing SLRP Benefits upon acceptance of an AGR and/or Military Technician Position, dated
14 September 2009
* ETP request
* SLRP Addendum
* email between the applicant and members of the Wisconsin Army National Guard (WIARNG)
* two DA Forms 2475 and allied documents
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant enlisted in the WIARNG on 14 April 2008. His SLRP Addendum indicates he was eligible for the SLRP, and at the time of his enlistment he had four existing loans in the amount of $13,625.00.
2. Section V (Termination without Recoupment) indicates he understood that his SLRP eligibility would be terminated if he accepted a military technician or Title 10 or Title 32 AGR tour.
3. On 14 September 2009, the NGB published Memorandum, Subject: Clarification of Continuing SLRP Benefits Upon Acceptance of an AGR and/or Military Technician Position. Paragraph 4 of the memorandum states: "Soldiers ordered to active duty in the State (Title 32) AGR program and (Title 32) Military Technician program will be entitled to SLRP payments as long as they are serving under their initial contract and/or agreement for which SLRP was awarded, "pending service member has received first anniversary payment and has remained in good standing."
4. On 31 March 2010, the applicant was ordered to active duty in an AGR status effective 1 April 2010.
5. On 14 September 2012, the Department of the Army, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, Incentives and Budget Branch published a memorandum, Subject: ETP for ARNG Personnel Contracted Under SLRP and Accepted AGR or Military Technician Positions, 9 October 2008-17 April 2009. The memorandum states, in part:
a. The ARNG requests the authority to grant an exception to allow ARNG members who contracted under the SLRP, who accepted either an AGR or military technician position between 9 October 2008 and 3 November 2010 the ability to remain eligible for payment of their qualifying Federal loans to the end of the contractually-obligated period designated in their SLRP contract addendum. An ETP is hereby granted for members accepting an AGR or military technician position between 9 October 2008 and 17 April 2009.
b. On 9 October 2008, the ARNG policy was changed to reflect Army G-1 guidance. On 17 April 2009, a memorandum was published withdrawing the previous guidance and providing new clear guidance as stipulated by the Secretary of the Army on the subject. Though the guidance provided that effective 21 May 2008 Selected Reserve members who accept AGR or military technician positions would be terminated without recoupment, an exception was granted through 17 April 2009 due to the confusion caused by conflicting guidance in that time frame. ETPs for members accepting after 17 April 2009 through 3 November 2010 should be considered by the ARNG on a
case-by-case basis.
6. On 23 September 2013, the NGB denied the applicant's request for an ETP to retain participation in the SLRP and to receive payments for FY 2012 and 2013. The NGB cited as the reason for the denial the fact that he accepted an AGR position after his contract start date which violates ARNG Selected Reserve Incentive Program. The NGB directed the State Incentive Manager to terminate the incentive one day prior to entering the AGR program. The NGB also indicated that payments received for term served while in an AGR status were to be recouped.
7. He provides an email between members of the WIARNG, including the Assistant Incentives Manager (SLRP) and the Education Service Specialist, that suggest there was a degree of confusion regarding the policy for termination and recoupment of SLRP payments.
8. Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 1205.21, Subject: Reserve Component Incentive Program Procedures, paragraph 6.9 provides that recoupment is not required if accepting an AGR position or a military technician position where membership in a Reserve component is a condition of employment, and member has served at least six months of the incentive contract following receipt of the initial payment.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends he should be granted an ETP to retain the SLRP incentive or in the alternative, that payments already received not be recouped.
2. The applicant enlisted in the WIARNG on 14 April 2008 and his contract shows he was eligible for participation in the SLRP. His contract also indicates that eligibility for participation in the SLRP would be terminated without recoupment if he accepted a military technician or Title 10 or Title 32 AGR tour. However, guidance published by the NGB provided that Soldiers ordered to active duty in the State Title 32 AGR program would be entitled to SLRP payments as long as they remained serving under their initial contract and/or agreement for which SLRP was awarded, pending service member had received first anniversary payment and had remained in good standing.
3. The guidance provided by the NGB was clarified on 14 September 2012 by the Army's Incentives and Budget Branch to allow Soldiers accepting an AGR position between 9 October 2008 and 17 April 2009 the ability to remain eligible for SLRP. The applicant accepted the AGR position on 1 April 2010.
4. The applicant indicated he received payments for FY 2009, 2010, and 2011. It is reasonable to presume that the payments received after his acceptance of the AGR position were disbursed in accordance with the NGB guidance at the time. Therefore, he should not be penalized by having those payments recouped. In addition, DODI 1205.21 provides that recoupment is not required if accepting an AGR position and the member has served at least six months of the incentive contract following receipt of the initial payment. The applicant clearly falls under this category.
5. Based on the Army's Incentives and Budget Branch guidance, the applicant's participation in the SLRP should be terminated; however, payments received prior to 14 September 2012, the date of the clarification memorandum, should not be recouped.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
____x___ ___x____ ___x____ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and State ARNG records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing an exception to policy to terminate any ongoing recoupment action was granted and refunding, if needed, out of ARNG funds, any recoupment of these monies that may have already occurred that is related to this correction of records.
2. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to granting his request for continued eligibility for participation in the SLRP.
_______ _ _x______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130019213
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130019213
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016655
On 1 October 2009, she accepted her AGR position and was told she would keep her enlistment incentives and she was referred to NGB-EDU-09-058, dated 14 September 2009, Subject: Clarification of Continuing SLRP Benefits Upon Acceptance of an AGR and/or Military Technician Position, which states Soldiers ordered to active duty in the State (Title 32) AGR program and (Title 32) Military Technician Program will be entitled to SLRP payments as long as they are serving under their initial contract...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005392
The applicant provides: * notification of incentive eligibility termination * signature authority memorandum for record * second review request for exception to policy for SLRP for the applicant * DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment) * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 600-7-5-R-E (SLRP Addendum) * Student Loan Data Download * two DA Forms 2823 (Sworn Statement) * multiple student loan vouchers * NGB memorandum of clarification of SLRP benefits upon acceptance of an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021599
She indicated or acknowledged she understood: * she was currently in the ARNG and was extending for 6 years in the ARNG, in the non-critical MOS of 42F and non-critical unit (4th Personnel Service Detachment) that was authorized the SLRP incentive * she was not enlisting for an AGR tour (under Title 10 or Title 32) nor was she enlisting for a technician position * she had 3 loans in the amount of $20,000 and the total amount of qualifying loans would not exceed $20,000 * her SLRP eligibility...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012615
The applicant states: * he enlisted in the SDARNG on 19 September 2008 after a 6-year break in service and contracted for the SLRP as an enlistment incentive * on 27 September 2009, he accepted a full-time position as a military technician (MT) in the SDARNG * prior to accepting the MT position, he specifically asked how it would impact his enlistment incentive and was advised by a supervisory human resources specialist that his incentives would not be impacted * National Guard Bureau (NGB)...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019789
The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy (ETP) to retain eligibility for the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive written in her enlistment contract. The applicant states: * her enlistment contract outlined that the SLRP would be revoked if she took a new duty assignment as a technician or an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) position * the National Guard Bureau (NGB) published Education and Incentives Operational Message (EIOM) 13-003 to provide instructions for ETP...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020070
The applicant requests an exception to policy (ETP) to retain eligibility for the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive for which he contracted when he extended his enlistment in the Virginia Army National Guard (VAARNG) on 20 January 2007. The applicant states the National Guard Bureau (NGB) denied his request for an ETP to retain his eligibility for the SLRP incentive due to the facts that: * he accepted an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) position * the SLRP addendum to his extension...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006358
If accepting an AGR or Mil Tech position where membership in a Reserve component is a condition of employment, and member has served at least 6 months of the incentive contract following receipt of the initial incentive payment. NGB memorandum NGB-EDU-09-001, subject: Change to AGR and Mil Tech Termination and Recoupment Rules, dated 29 October 2008, states in paragraph 2a that any enlisted Soldier currently under contract for an incentive governed by Memorandum, NGB-ARM, 10 August 2007,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017103
She formally requested an ETP from the State Incentive Manager on 1 October 2012, wherein she requested relief from, and termination of, the levied recoupment action in the amount of $20,428.45 that resulted from the termination of her incentive entitlements. (8) Furthermore, had she executed a written agreement the bonus would have been terminated in accordance with Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1205.21 (Reserve Component Incentive Programs Procedures), paragraph E3.l.8.2,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001892
He confirmed that he entered the CLRP on 8 April 2010, the request was approved and documentation executed, and the applicant entered the AGR program on 18 July 2010 when Soldiers could retain their incentive as an AGR or Mil-Tech. There is no evidence of record of any other anniversary payments. The evidence of record shows the applicant accepted an AGR position with a 3-year active duty commitment beginning 18 July 2010 and he performed the duties of Officer Strength Manager Recruiter...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011263
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. His record contains a memorandum from the Deputy G1, ARNG, dated 17 December 2012, denying the applicant's request for ETP to retain the $20,000.00 SLRP incentive. The applicant became a Mil Tech on 21 December 2009, in apparent violation of the enlistment addendum which authorized him the SLRP incentive; however, at the time the applicant became a Mil Tech, ARNG policy regarding eligibility in the SLRP was not clearly defined as...