Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021432
Original file (20140021432 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  22 September 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140021432 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in three separate applications, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show his correct specialty number as “36C2O” and that his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) be corrected to show in item 38 (Record of Assignments) that he was reassigned to the 11th Combat Aviation Battalion (CAB) prior to 19 July 1971 and that he served as a perimeter guard and helicopter recon spotter.  

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his correct specialty was 36C2O (lineman) but his DD Form 214 reflects 26C2O.  He also states that his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) is missing an entry in item 38 showing that in May 1971 he was reassigned from the 2nd Signal Group in Long Binh to the 11th CAB in Phu Loi several weeks before being admitted to the hospital.  Additionally, it does not reflect that he served as a perimeter guard and helicopter recon spotter.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 and DA Form 20, a clinical record coversheet showing he was assigned to the 11th CAB when he was transferred to the 24th Evacuation Hospital in Long Binh and a copy of his evacuation orders to Camp Zama. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted on 21 May 1970.  He completed his basic training at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri and his advanced individual training as a lineman in military occupational specialty 36C2O at Fort Hood, Texas before being transferred to Vietnam on 24 January 1971.

3.  His DA Form 20 shows he was initially assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Detachment, 2nd Signal Group for duty as an information specialist.  On 31 July 1971, he was transferred to a hospital at Camp Zama, Japan and on 28 August 1971, he was transferred back to Vietnam for assignment to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 13th CAB for duty as a message center clerk. 

4.  He departed Vietnam on or about 12 January 1972 and he was transferred to Oakland Army Base, California where he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) as an overseas returnee.  He had served 1 year, 7 months, and 22 days of total active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows in item 23a that his specialty number and title were “26C2O Lineman.”

5.  A review of his official records failed to show any evidence in the form of orders assigning him to the 11th CAB. 

6.  The DA Form 20 became obsolete when it was replaced by the DA Form 2-1 on 1 January 1973 and is no longer used.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that his primary specialty is incorrectly reflected on his DD Form 214 as 26C2O instead of 36C2O has been noted and found to have merit.  The applicant was awarded the primary specialty of 36C2O and is entitled to have that specialty reflected on his DD Form 214 in item 23a. 

2.  While the sincerity of the applicant’s claim that he was assigned to the 11th CAB and that he served as a perimeter guard and helicopter recon spotter is not in doubt, there is insufficient evidence in the available records to determine with any degree of certainty when he was assigned to the 11th CAB and no evidence to show he served as a perimeter guard and helicopter recon spotter.

3.  Notwithstanding that the DA Form 20 is no longer available, the applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application and the evidence of record sufficient evidence to establish his date of assignment to the 11th CAB and that he served as a perimeter guard and helicopter recon spotter.

4.  Therefore, in the absence of such evidence there appears to be no basis to grant that portion of the applicant’s request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by changing his primary specialty in item 23a of his DD Form 214 from "26C2O" to "36C2O."

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to changing his record of assignment to show assignment to the 11th CAB and his principal duties to perimeter guard and helicopter recon spotter.


      ______________X_________
               CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140021432



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140021432



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017302

    Original file (20100017302.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 22 (Military Occupational Specialties) of his DA Form 20 shows the entries "Primary MOS (PMOS) 63B2O, Light-Wheel Vehicle Mechanic, effective 16 December 1966." The source documents used for preparation of the DD Form 214 at the time of the applicant’s separation included the DA Form 20, separation orders, and any applicable orders or documents on file in the MPRJ, or Official Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015827

    Original file (20110015827.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * Letter Orders Number 11-17, Headquarters, 379th Signal Battalion (Support), Army Post Office (APO) San Francisco 96232 (Thailand), dated 18 November 1970, directing 10 days of temporary duty (TDY) to Long Binh to attend a prescribed load list (PLL) course * DA Form 87 (U.S. Army Certificate of Training) for the 23-28 November 1970 PLL Course conducted by the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013197

    Original file (20140013197.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Furthermore, item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077682C070215

    Original file (2002077682C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also requests correction of his DD Form 214 to show the Purple Heart, the Bronze Star Medal, the Presidential Unit Citation, the Meritorious Unit Commendation, the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, the Good Conduct Medal, four awards of the Air Medal (correctly known as the Air Medal with Numeral "4"), two awards of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020578

    Original file (20090020578.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's military service records do not contain general orders awarding him the Purple Heart and his name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for correction of his record to show award of the Purple Heart or exposure to Agent Orange.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103876C070208

    Original file (2004103876C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Silver Star and the Army Commendation Medal and, that his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to show that he held the military occupational specialties (MOS) 67A1F and 67N20. The evidence further shows that by regulation, only the Soldier's primary MOS was entered in item 23a on his discharge or released from active duty. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012649

    Original file (20060012649.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the “Crew Chief Wings” (correctly known as the Aircraft Crew Member Badge), the “Door Gunner Medal,” the Air Medal, two awards of the Purple Heart (correctly known as the Purple Heart with First Oak Leaf Cluster), the Good Conduct Medal, the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar, and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar. There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009465

    Original file (20080009465.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show that his primary military occupational specialty (MOS) at the time of his release from active duty was 427.10 (Aircraft Armament Repairman). The applicant essentially states that once he returned from Vietnam, he was sent to Fort Hood, Texas with an MOS of 45G (Turret Artillery Repairman), but that this was not his primary MOS. The evidence of record also clearly shows that he served in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016692

    Original file (20140016692.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) for his Guard service shows in Item 6 (Military Occupational Specialties) MOS 11B. However, he was informed by the battalion commander that he was assigned to the unit for service in his secondary MOS 11B. However, MAJ MJM does not indicate why he, as his platoon leader, did not recommend the applicant for the award of the Combat Infantryman Badge at the time prior to his departure from Company E. 5.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000135

    Original file (20100000135.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was assigned to the 11th ACR in Vietnam. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 does not show entitlement to the CMB or the CIB. However, there is no evidence of record and the applicant provided no evidence which shows he completed a course on animal specialist skills.