Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000135
Original file (20100000135.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  22 July 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100000135 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of items 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) and item 25 (Education and Training Completed) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge).  He also requests award of the Combat Medical Badge (CMB) and the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states:

* upon his arrival in Vietnam he was assigned to the 4th Medical Detachment at Long Binh
* he volunteered for special training in animal specialist skills
* he was trained in Long Binh and Phu Loi
* he was attached to the 2nd Squadron, 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment (ACR) from October 1971 to April 1972
* his attachment to the 11th ACR means he served under combat conditions in an active combat unit
* item 12 of his DD Form 214 should reflect the 11th ACR
* the training he received in animal specialist skills should be added to item 25 of his DD Form 214
* as a consequence of this service, by definition, he is eligible for the CMB and the CIB 


3.  The applicant provides:

* A roster of the 11th Armored Cavalry's veterans of Vietnam and Cambodia
* A website extract of a document entitled "U.S. Army Medical Support for Vietnam War Dogs."

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 April 1969 for a period of 
3 years.  He was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 91R (food inspection specialist).  He arrived in Vietnam on 13 September 1971.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in MOS 91R while assigned to the 4th Medical Detachment in Vietnam from 15 September 1971 to 16 April 1972.  On 20 April 1972, he was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining military service obligation.

3.  Item 12 of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows his last duty assignment and major command was the 4th Medical Detachment in Vietnam.  Item 25 of his 
DD Form 214 shows he completed the 8-week Food Inspection Procedures course in 1969. 

4.  There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was assigned to the 11th ACR in Vietnam.

5.  There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant completed a course on animal specialist skills.

6.  Item 27 (Military Education) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows he completed the 8-week basic food inspection procedures course [at Chicago, IL] in 1969 and a 4-week noncommissioned officer academy [at Fort Richardson, AK] in 1971.

7.  There are no orders for the CMB or the CIB in the applicant's available records.

8.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 does not show entitlement to the CMB or the CIB.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  The regulation, in effect at the time, provided that for:

* item 12, enter the individual's current unit of assignment and the title of the major command or agency having jurisdiction over that organization
* item 25, enter the list of service schools, including major courses that were successfully completed, and military sponsored courses completed in civilian schools and colleges during the period covered by the DD Form 214.

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CMB is awarded to medical department personnel (colonel and below) who are assigned or attached to a medical unit of company or smaller size that is organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size which is engaged in active ground combat.  Battle participation credit is not sufficient; the infantry unit must have been in contact with the enemy and the Soldier must have been personally present and under fire during such ground combat.

11.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.  Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provides that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although the applicant contends he was attached to the 2nd Squadron,
11th ACR in Vietnam from October 1971 to April 1972, his DA Form 20 shows he was assigned to the 4th Medical Detachment in Vietnam from September 1971 to April 1972.  The last unit of assignment is to be entered on the DD Form 214.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence in which to amend item 12 of his DD Form 214.

2.  The applicant's contention he received training in animal specialist skills was noted.  However, there is no evidence of record and the applicant provided no evidence which shows he completed a course on animal specialist skills.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence in which to amend item 25 of his
DD Form 214.

3.  There are no orders for the CMB in the available records.  There is also no evidence of record which shows he was assigned or attached to a medical unit of company or smaller size that is organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size that was engaged in active ground combat in Vietnam.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence in which to base award of the CMB in this case.

4.  There are no orders for the CIB in the available records.  The evidence of record shows the applicant held and served in MOS 91R and he was assigned to the 4th Medical Detachment as a food inspection assistant during his assignment in Vietnam.  There is no evidence of record which shows he held and served in an infantry MOS or that he served in active ground combat while an assigned member of an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size in Vietnam.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence in which to base award of the CIB in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ____x____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100000135



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100000135



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010821

    Original file (20110010821.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with “V” Device. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the AGCM (1st Award) and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017540

    Original file (20070017540.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Specifically, counsel presents the following arguments: a. the Board erred in denying the applicant his CMB based on a determination that he was not assigned or attached to a medical unit of company or smaller size that was organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regiment, or smaller size and that the word “or” is a mutually exclusive criterion that does not require the unit of attachment or assignment to be organic to an infantry unit; b. the medical officer’s statement and evidence that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003926

    Original file (20090003926.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS). There is no evidence to show what subordinate unit of the 11th ACR the applicant was assigned to. _______ _ X_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019906

    Original file (20110019906.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His service records do not contain official orders awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge. An undated statement from a unit member who was wounded in combat in Vietnam while assigned to the same unit, who states that the unit was involved in combat in Vietnam and that the applicant was a part of the involvement. There are three requirements for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge: the Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019409

    Original file (20100019409.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It also appears that while the applicant was assigned to a unit that participated in combat, the unit was an armored cavalry unit and at that time medics in such units were not authorized award of the CMB. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007470

    Original file (20090007470.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, the BSM with "V" Device and BSM for meritorious service he earned are not listed on his DD Form 214, and he was a 91B (Medical Specialist) assigned to a rifle platoon and should have been awarded the CMB. Given the applicant's cavalry squadron commander confirmed in a 15 June 1968 request that the unit had an organic rifle platoon and that the applicant served as that platoon's medic and had been present with the unit on numerous occasions when it was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040007981C070208

    Original file (20040007981C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each RVN campaign a member is credited with participating in. The evidence of record does show that based on his service and campaign participation in the RVN, the applicant is entitled to the MUC, RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and 4 bronze service stars with his VSM. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014000

    Original file (20130014000.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show that he was assigned to a medical unit that was attached to an infantry unit. On 26 June 1972, he was assigned to the 95th Evacuation Hospital, in the RVN in duty MOS 91A, as a medical corpsman. The available evidence does not show, nor has he provided evidence showing, he was assigned to a medical unit organic to an infantry unit of brigade or smaller size.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010879

    Original file (20090010879.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 38 shows that while serving in the RVN he was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC), 1st Battalion, 22nd Infantry Regiment, performing duties in MOS 91A as a radio telephone operator and 91B as a medical specialist, and item 41(Awards and Decorations) shows he earned the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), 1 Overseas Service Bar, RVN Campaign...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090814C070212

    Original file (2003090814C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record and separation document (DD Form 214) to show that he served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 91B (Medical Specialist) and that he is entitled to receive the Combat Medical Badge (CMB). The applicant's military records do not contain orders or documents that indicate that he was ever recommended for or awarded the Combat Medical Badge (CMB). Further, the supporting documents, while showing the applicant may have served or...