Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021205
Original file (20140021205.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  8 September 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140021205 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests promotion to the rank and pay grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 prior to his placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL).  He also requests correction of his records to show he was permanently retired.

2.  The applicant states he was promotable to pay grade E-6 at the time of his separation.  He should have been promoted.  He was on the TDRL and is now permanently retired.

3.  The applicant provides copies of the following:

* DA Form 3357 (Board Member Appraisal Worksheet)
* Report of Promotion Board Proceedings memorandum (page 1 of 3 pages)
* Enlisted Record Brief (ERB)
* Orders Number 279-1302
* Removal from TDRL Notification memorandum
* Order Number D-289-66

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army, in pay grade E-1, on 16 April 2003.  He was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 63B (light wheel vehicle mechanic).  He was promoted to the rank and pay grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 on 1 September 2005.
2.  He provided copies of the following:

   a.  A DA Form 3357, dated 3 December 2008, showing he was recommended for promotion to pay grade E-6 with 150 voting board members' points.

   b.  Page 1 of a 3-page Report of Promotion Board Proceedings memorandum, dated 3 December 2008, showing an Enlisted Promotion Board convened on that date and recommended the applicant for promotion to pay grade E-6 with a total of 739 points (589 promotion points and 150 board points). The portions of this report that confirm the promotion board president and the promotion authority approved the report are not available for review with this case. 

   c.  An ERB, dated 4 October 2012, showing in Section I (Assignment Information) he had 14 Promotion Points as of November 2011.  No previous promotion points were indicated on the form.

   d.  Orders Number 279-1302, issued by the U.S. Army Installation Management Command on 5 October 2012, placing him on the TDRL in the retired rank of SGT effective 31 December 2012.  

3.  His records contain a Counseling Statement, dated 5 October 2012, wherein he acknowledged counseling pertaining to the election of his medical separation date from the Army.

4.  He was honorably retired on 30 December 2012, by reason of temporary disability.  He was placed on the TDRL on 31 December 2012.  He was credited with completing 9 years, 8 months, and 15 days of active service.  His DD Form 214 lists in:

* Item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) – SGT
* Item 4b (Pay Grade) – E-5
* Item 12i (Effective Date of Pay Grade) – 1 September 2005

5.  His records also contain the following:

   a.  A DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) which shows an informal PEB convened on 26 September 2014, and after consideration of clinical records, laboratory findings, x-rays, and physical examinations, found the applicant was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder, degenerative disc disease, and left sinus tarsi syndrome.  The PEB found he was physically unfit with a 60 percent (%) disability rating and recommended his permanent disability retirement.  He concurred with the board’s findings and recommendations and waived his right to a formal hearing and the PEB was approved.  The DA Form 199 shows his rank as SGT.

   b.  A Removal from TDRL Notification memorandum, dated 16 October 2014, wherein he was advised of his removal from the TDRL as a result of his permanent retirement.

   c.  Order Number D-289-66, issued by the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency on 16 October 2014, removing him from the TDRL on the same date, by reason of permanent disability retirement with a 60% rating.

6.  In an advisory opinion, dated 18 March 2015, the Chief, Department of the Army Promotions, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, stated after a review of the applicant's application it was determined that his request should be disapproved.  The available records of the Junior Enlisted Promotion Section indicated the applicant's promotion records did not reflect any promotion points at the time of his separation.

7.  The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for acknowledgement/
rebuttal on 25 March 2015 and he did not respond.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  Chapter 2 contained guidance for preparation of the DD Form 214 and stated that items 4a and 4b show the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at time of separation and were obtained from the Soldier's records (promotion or reduction orders).  Paragraph 2-1(b)3 of Army Regulation 635-5 provides that a DD Form 214 will not be prepared for Soldiers removed from the TDRL.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions), in effect at the time, set the enlisted promotions and reductions function of the military personnel system. The regulation stated in:

   a.  Paragraph 1-20a – Soldiers who were pending referral to an MOS/Medical Retention Board under Army Regulation 40-400 (Patient Administration) or referral to an Medical Evaluation Board or a PEB under Army Regulation 635-40 (Personnel Separations, Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) would not be denied promotion (if already promotable) on the basis of medical disqualification if they are otherwise qualified for promotion.

   b.  Paragraph 1-20(c) – Under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372, Soldiers on a promotion list at the time of retirement for disability will be retired for disability at the promotion list grade.  Further, the Soldier will be promoted to the designated grade effective the day before placement on the Retired List.

10.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372 (Grade on Retirement Physical Disability, Members of the Armed Forces), states that unless entitled to a higher retired grade under some other provision of law, any member of an Armed Force who is retired for physical disability under sections 1201 or 1204 of this title, or whose name is placed on the TDRL under sections 1202 or 1205 of this title, is entitled to the grade equivalent to the highest of the following:

* the grade or rank in which he is serving on the date when his name is placed on the TDRL or, if his name was not carried on that list, on the date when he is retired
* the highest temporary grade or rank in which he served satisfactorily, as determined by the Secretary of the Armed Force from which he is retired
* the permanent Regular or Reserve grade to which he would have been promoted had it not been for the physical disability for which he is retired and which was found to exist as a result of a physical examination
* the temporary grade to which he would have been promoted had it not been for the physical disability for which he is retired, if eligibility for that promotion was required to be based on cumulative years of service or years of service in grade and the disability was discovered as a result of a physical examination

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that he should have been promoted to SSG/E-6 prior to his separation on 30 December 2012 and his placement on the TDRL.  However, the Junior Enlisted Promotion Section, HRC, found that his promotion records did not indicate any promotion points at the time of his separation.

2.  By law, any member of the Armed Forces who is retired for physical disability is entitled to the grade equivalent to the permanent regular grade to which he/she would have been promoted had it not been for the physical disability for which he/she is retired.  Soldiers on a promotion list at the time of retirement for disability will be retired for disability at the promotion list grade.  The Soldier will be promoted to the designated grade effective the day before placement on the Retired List.

3.  The available evidence does not show and he did not provide sufficient evidence showing he would have been promoted and/or was on the promotion list (promotable) for pay grade E-6 at the time of his retirement for disability on 30 December 2012.  The available evidence shows in September 2011 he was aware his promotable status had been removed.

4.  The DD Form 214 he was issued on 30 December 2012 appears to correctly show his rank as SGT.  The available evidence shows he held the rank of SGT at the time of his separation.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to grant him the requested relief.

5.  There is no evidence to show the applicant performed any period of active duty service following his placement on the TDRL that would have warranted the issuance of another DD Form 214.  The applicant's removal from the TDRL and subsequent permanent retirement has no impact on the DD Form 214 he was issued on 30 December 2012.  A DD Form 214 will not be prepared for Soldiers removed from the TDRL.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ___x___ _  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      __________x________________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140021205



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140021205



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013155

    Original file (20130013155.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372 (Grade on Retirement Physical Disability, Members of the Armed Forces), states that unless entitled to a higher retired grade under some other provision of law, any member of an Armed Force who is retired for physical disability under section 1201 or 1204 of this title, or whose name is placed on the TDRL under section 1202 or 1205 of this title, is entitled to the grade equivalent to the highest of the following: * the grade or rank in which he is serving...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003316

    Original file (20130003316.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Military Personnel Message Number 05-084, dated 4 April 2005, subject: Enlisted Eligibility Regarding Enlisted Soldiers Undergoing Evaluation by the MOS/Medical Retention Board (MMRB), Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) or PEB, references Army Regulation 600-8-19 and Headquarters, Department of the Army, memorandum, dated 28 March 2005, and states Soldiers who are on a promotion list at the time of retirement for disability will be retired for disability at the promotion list grade. He was a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023060

    Original file (20110023060.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * Enlisted Record Brief (ERB), dated 7 June 2009 * DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings), dated 27 August 2009 * Orders 261-1314, dated 18 September 2009 * DA Form 199, dated 29 April 2011 * Orders D126-06, dated 6 May 2011 * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * DA Form 2166-8 (Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. His DD Form 214 currently shows he was retired due to temporary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016992

    Original file (20130016992.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states at the time of his application he was in the medical evaluation board (MEB) process. The applicant provides: * U.S. Army Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), Fort Sam Houston, TX Memorandum for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), dated 17 April 2013 * Human Resources Command (HRC) Memorandum for U.S. Army, Promotion Work Centers, dated 18 April 2013, subject: Department of the Army Promotion Point Cutoff Scores for 1 May 2013 and Junior Enlisted Issues for the Active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014223

    Original file (20140014223.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372, specifies any member of the Armed Forces who is retired for physical disability or whose name is placed on the TDRL is entitled to the grade equivalent to the highest of the following: (1) the grade in which he is serving on the date when his or her name was placed on the TDRL or on the date when retired, or (2) the highest temporary grade in which he or she served...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015375

    Original file (20100015375.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 31 March 2009, the South Carolina ARNG published Permanent Orders 090-001 releasing him from his active ARNG assignment effective 30 July 2009 and placing him on the State Retired List in the rank/grade of SSG/E-6 effective 31 July 2009. His retirement orders list his rank/grade as a SGT/E-5. As a result, the Board recommends that the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * amending Orders 099-0903, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023034

    Original file (20110023034.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Orders 311-0916, dated 7 November 2005, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Gordon, GA, retired her from active duty because of physical disability incurred while entitled to basic pay effective 5 February 2006 and placed her on the TDRL in the rank of SGT effective 6 February 2006. Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions), paragraph 1-20c, states that under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372, Soldiers on a promotion list at the time of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002194

    Original file (20110002194.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her record to show she was retired as a sergeant (SGT)/E-5 instead of specialist (SPC)/E-4. Her DD Form 214 currently shows she was retired due to temporary disability in the rank/pay grade of SPC/E-4 with an effective date of promotion of 22 October 2003. In view of the foregoing, the applicant is entitled to correction to her DD Form 214 to show she was promoted to SGT/E-5 with an effective date and date of rank of 10 November 2008.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012363

    Original file (20100012363.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He would like to have his promotion to SSG/E-6. His retirement orders listed his rank/grade as a SGT/E-5. Nevertheless, by law and regulation, Soldiers on a promotion list at the time of retirement for disability will be retired for disability at the promotion list grade.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003542

    Original file (20120003542.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant also states his medical retirement with a 30% disability rating was only based on his condition of asthma. His record contains a DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile), dated 13 April 2005, that shows his medical conditions at the time as: Asthma and Chronic left knee pain. The applicant's record is void of any evidence and he did not provide any evidence that shows he appeared before a promotion board for consideration to the rank/grade of SGT/E-5 at any time during his service or...