Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013155
Original file (20130013155.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  22 April 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130013155 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was retired by reason of disability in the rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 vice sergeant (SGT)/E-5.

2.  The applicant states he was not promoted to SSG due to a medical evaluation board (MEB).  He made the cut-off score as stated in Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions), but his DD Form 214 does not reflect the corrected rank/grade.  He was a promotable SGT and getting ready to be promoted.  Unfortunately, his unit did not promote him to SSG because he was pending an MEB.  He was medically retired in the lower grade without the benefit of a review by the Army Grade Determination Review Board.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DA Form 3355 (Promotion Point Worksheet)
* Promotion Board Proceedings for Promotion to SGT/SSG
* DA Forms 3356 (Board Member Appraisal Worksheets)
* memorandum of responsibility for promotion consideration
* Army Times announcement of Soldiers recommended for promotion to SSG by name


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 June 2002 and he held military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Infantryman).

2.  He served in Afghanistan from 20 January 2003 to 15 August 2003.  He also served in Kuwait/Iraq from 10 January 2004 to 14 May 2004.  He reenlisted on 16 May 2005.  He was promoted to SGT effective 1 July 2006.  He served in Kuwait/Iraq again from 1 November 2006 to 13 December 2007.

3.  On 3 June 2008, he appeared before the 1st Battalion, 77th Armor, semi-centralized promotion board at Fort Bliss, TX.  He was recommended for promotion to SSG and his name was incorporated into the Promotion Standing List with 498 total points.

4.  It appears he entered the Army Physical Disability Evaluation System at some stage.  A physical evaluation board (PEB) convened on 6 November 2008 and found his medical conditions prevented him from performing the duties required of his grade and specialty and determined he was physically unfit.

5.  He was rated under the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities and granted a 70-percent combined disability rating.  The PEB recommended his placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL).

6.  Headquarters, U.S. Army Air Defense Artillery Center and Fort Bliss, Orders 350-0018, dated 15 December 2008, retired him in the rank of SGT effective 6 February 2009 because of physical disability and placed him on the TDRL effective 7 February 2009.

7.  His DD Form 214 shows he was honorably retired by reason of physical disability on 6 February 2009 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), chapter 4.  He completed 6 years and 8 months of creditable active service.

8.  His DD Form 214 also shows in:

* item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) – SGT
* item 4b (Pay Grade) – E-5
* item 12i (Effective Date of Pay Grade) – 1 July 2006

9.  He provided a copy of the Army Times, undated, announcing the Soldiers recommended for promotion to SSG by name together with the cutoff scores for July (presumably 2008) showing the cutoff score for MOS 11B as 450 in the primary and secondary zones.

10.  On 25 January 2012, he underwent a TDRL PEB that recommended a disability rating of 30 percent and permanent retirement.

11.  U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency Order 039-06, dated 8 February 2012, removed him from the TDRL effective 8 February 2012 and permanently retired him in the rank of SGT by reason of permanent disability.

12.  An advisory opinion was received from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) Junior Enlisted Promotions Section, dated 22 August 2013, together with a revised advisory opinion, dated 20 March 2014, in the processing of this case.  HRC recommended approval and stated a review of the applicant's available records indicates he was promotable at the time of separation.  In accordance with Army Regulation 600-8-19, paragraph 1-20, a Soldier who is pending referral to the MOS Medical Retention Board under Army Regulation 600-60 (Physical Performance Evaluation System), or to an MEB under Army Regulation 40-400 (Patient Administration), or to a PEB under Army Regulation 635-40 will not be denied promotion (if already promotable) on the basis of medical qualification.  His DD Form 214 will be corrected to show his rank, grade, and effective date of pay grade as 6 February 2009.  The applicant was ineligible for promotion on 1 July 2008 because he did not meet the 12-month service remaining requirements in accordance with Army Regulation 600-8-19, paragraph 3-34.

13.  The applicant was furnished with a copy of the advisory opinion and the revised opinion.  He responded by email, dated 27 March 2013, through a Wounded Warrior Program advocate; however, his response did not contain anything.

14.  On 20 November 2013, HRC issued a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) amending the applicant's retired rank/grade from SGT/E-5 to SSG/E-6 and his effective date of pay grade to 6 February 2009.

15.  An email from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service, dated 6 March 2013, confirmed the applicant is receiving retired pay at the grade of E-5.

16.  Army Regulation 600-8-19 provides for the promotion and reduction of enlisted Soldiers.  Paragraph 1-20(c) states that under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372, Soldiers on a promotion list at the time of retirement for disability will be retired for disability at the promotion list grade.  Further, the Soldier will be promoted to the designated grade effective the day before placement on the Retired List.

17.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372 (Grade on Retirement Physical Disability, Members of the Armed Forces), states that unless entitled to a higher retired grade under some other provision of law, any member of an Armed Force who is retired for physical disability under section 1201 or 1204 of this title, or whose name is placed on the TDRL under section 1202 or 1205 of this title, is entitled to the grade equivalent to the highest of the following:

* the grade or rank in which he is serving on the date when his name is placed on the TDRL or, if his name was not carried on that list, on the date when he is retired
* the highest temporary grade or rank in which he served satisfactorily, as determined by the Secretary of the Armed Force from which he is retired
* the permanent Regular or Reserve grade to which he would have been promoted had it not been for the physical disability for which he is retired and which was found to exist as a result of a physical examination
* the temporary grade to which he would have been promoted had it not been for the physical disability for which he is retired, if eligibility for that promotion was required to be based on cumulative years of service or years of service in grade and the disability was discovered as a result of a physical examination

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant served on active duty from 7 June 2002 through 6 February 2009.  He was a promotable SGT/E-5 at the time of his disability retirement.  By law, Soldiers on a promotion list at the time of retirement for disability will be retired for disability at the promotion list grade.  Further, the Soldier will be promoted to the designated grade effective the day before placement on the Retired List.

2.  While his DD Form 214 has been corrected to show his correct rank/grade and effective date of pay grade, his retirement orders still do not reflect the correct retirement rank/grade.  Therefore, the applicant is entitled to correction of his records to show he was placed on the TDRL in the retired rank/grade of SSG/E-6 vice SGT/E-5 effective 7 February 2009 with entitlement to back retired pay.

3.  The applicant was considered by a TDRL PEB that recommended his permanent retirement.  He was removed from the TDRL on 8 February 2012 and he was permanently retired in the grade of SGT/E-5.  He should be entitled to correction of his records to show he was permanently retired in the grade of E-6 vice E-5 effective 8 February 2012.

4.  Although the applicant did not request a specific date of promotion, his submission of the Army Times cutoff scores indicates he believed he was entitled to an earlier promotion to SSG.  The applicant did not meet the 12-month service remaining requirements of Army Regulation 600-8-19 for an earlier promotion.  Likewise, there is insufficient evidence to show the applicant was eligible for promotion earlier than 6 February 2009.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* amending Headquarters, U.S. Army Air Defense Artillery Center and Fort Bliss, Orders 350-0018, dated 15 December 2008, to show his retired grade of rank as "SSG" vice "SGT" effective 7 February 2009
* amending U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency Order 039-06, dated 
8 February 2012, to show his rank as “SSG” in the standard name line
* paying him any adjusted retired pay due as a result of this correction



      ______________X___________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130013155



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130013155



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014000

    Original file (20140014000.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, to be placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) in the highest grade he satisfactorily held for the purpose of computation of disability retirement. The applicant states the Army Grade Determination Review Board (AGDRB) found the highest grade in which he satisfactorily served, for the purpose of computation of disability retirement/separation pay, was staff sergeant (SSG)/ E-6. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011270

    Original file (20130011270.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect: * he is a wounded warrior, serving at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (WRNMMC) * he appeared before the SSG promotion board on 2 August 2012 and was recommended for promotion by the board with a total of 365 points * his points were inaccurately calculated, as the promotions clerk erroneously omitted 19 months of deployment service, equaling 38 points, and an additional 54 points from across other categories * after the August 2012 SSG promotion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023060

    Original file (20110023060.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * Enlisted Record Brief (ERB), dated 7 June 2009 * DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings), dated 27 August 2009 * Orders 261-1314, dated 18 September 2009 * DA Form 199, dated 29 April 2011 * Orders D126-06, dated 6 May 2011 * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * DA Form 2166-8 (Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. His DD Form 214 currently shows he was retired due to temporary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014223

    Original file (20140014223.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372, specifies any member of the Armed Forces who is retired for physical disability or whose name is placed on the TDRL is entitled to the grade equivalent to the highest of the following: (1) the grade in which he is serving on the date when his or her name was placed on the TDRL or on the date when retired, or (2) the highest temporary grade in which he or she served...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015375

    Original file (20100015375.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 31 March 2009, the South Carolina ARNG published Permanent Orders 090-001 releasing him from his active ARNG assignment effective 30 July 2009 and placing him on the State Retired List in the rank/grade of SSG/E-6 effective 31 July 2009. His retirement orders list his rank/grade as a SGT/E-5. As a result, the Board recommends that the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * amending Orders 099-0903, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023034

    Original file (20110023034.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Orders 311-0916, dated 7 November 2005, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Gordon, GA, retired her from active duty because of physical disability incurred while entitled to basic pay effective 5 February 2006 and placed her on the TDRL in the rank of SGT effective 6 February 2006. Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions), paragraph 1-20c, states that under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1372, Soldiers on a promotion list at the time of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006284

    Original file (20130006284.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was promoted and subsequently retired in the rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6. He provides a memorandum, dated 14 November 2008, that indicates: * a promotion board convened on 14 November 2008 to review records and interview personnel for promotion to SGT and SSG * he was recommended for promotion to SSG in MOS 11B * the list of Soldiers recommended for promotion, including the applicant's name, be integrated into the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016992

    Original file (20130016992.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states at the time of his application he was in the medical evaluation board (MEB) process. The applicant provides: * U.S. Army Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), Fort Sam Houston, TX Memorandum for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), dated 17 April 2013 * Human Resources Command (HRC) Memorandum for U.S. Army, Promotion Work Centers, dated 18 April 2013, subject: Department of the Army Promotion Point Cutoff Scores for 1 May 2013 and Junior Enlisted Issues for the Active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002474

    Original file (20130002474.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Orders 344-0089, dated 10 December 2010, published by Headquarters, Fort Bliss amended Orders 029-0019, dated 29 January 2010, by changing his retired grade of rank from SSG to SFC. Order Number D254-12, dated 10 September 2012, removed him from the TDRL on 10 September 2012, and on the date following he was permanently retired in the rank of SFC. The evidence of record shows the applicant was medically retired on 19 February 2010 and was placed on the TDRL in the rank of SSG.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021205

    Original file (20140021205.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DA Form 3357, dated 3 December 2008, showing he was recommended for promotion to pay grade E-6 with 150 voting board members' points. Page 1 of a 3-page Report of Promotion Board Proceedings memorandum, dated 3 December 2008, showing an Enlisted Promotion Board convened on that date and recommended the applicant for promotion to pay grade E-6 with a total of 739 points (589 promotion points and 150 board points). The available evidence does not show and he did not provide sufficient...