Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020949
Original file (20140020949.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		BOARD DATE:	  14 July 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140020949 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that her general discharge be upgraded to a fully honorable discharge.

2.  The applicant states the character of her service is unjust because she has matured and sought mental health assistance since her discharge.  She is furthering her education and does not want her character of service to be a deciding factor in her career supported by VA Vocational Rehabilitation.  She was a young chaplain’s assistant and started acting out because of the trauma that she experienced and she would like to be able to say that she served her country honorably and not be judged by the character of her discharge.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was serving in the U.S. Army Reserve when she enlisted in the Regular Army on 31 August 2005 for a period of 4 years and training as a chaplain’s assistant.  She completed her one-station unit training at Fort Jackson, South Carolina and was transferred to Fort Hood, Texas for her first and only duty assignment.

3.  She deployed to Iraq on 2 October 2006 and on 5 April 2007, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against her for the wrongful consumption of alcohol and for wrongfully allowing a male Soldier into her room without a third party present.

4.  On 21 April 2007, the applicant’s commander notified her that he was initiating action to separate her from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, for misconduct – pattern of misconduct.  He cited as the basis for his recommendation the applicant’s failure to go to her place of duty and her NJP.

5.  After consulting with counsel the applicant elected to submit a statement in her own behalf.  However, the statement is not present in the available records.

6.  The appropriate authority approved the recommendation for discharge and directed that she be issued a general discharge.

7.  The applicant departed Iraq on 21 May 2007 and was transferred to Fort Hood, Texas where she was discharged under honorable conditions on 22 May 2007, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, due to a pattern of misconduct.  She had served 1 year and 8 days of active service during her current enlistment.

8.  On 19 February 2008, the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of her discharge.  After reviewing the facts and circumstances in her case, the ADRB determined that her discharge was both proper and equitable under the circumstances and voted unanimously to deny her request on 16 January 2009.

9.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.


	a.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and procedures for separating personnel for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor infractions, a pattern of misconduct, involvement in frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with civil and military authorities, and commission of a serious offense, which includes drug offenses.  Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.

	b.  Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural errors which would jeopardize her rights.

2.  Accordingly, the characterization and the narrative reason for separation were appropriate for the circumstances of her case.

3.  The applicant's contentions have been noted; however, they are not sufficiently mitigating when compared to the repeated nature of her offenses in a war zone.  

4.  Accordingly, the applicant's overall service simply did not rise to the level of a fully honorable discharge.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_x_______  ____x____  __x___  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140020949





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140020949



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130020028

    Original file (AR20130020028.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 16 September 2013, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. DA Form 1574 (Report of Proceedings by Investigating Officer/Board of Officers), dated 23 July 2013, reflects the board recommended the applicant be separated from the Army for a pattern of misconduct, under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 14-12b, with an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009142

    Original file (20130009142.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, for misconduct – pattern of misconduct on 14 May 2012. However, after reviewing the available evidence in her case the ADRB determined that under the circumstances her discharge was both proper and equitable and voted unanimously to deny her request for an upgrade of her discharge on 22 March 2013. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021405

    Original file (20110021405.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He was not married at the time of his discharge and was issued a RE Code of “3.” 3. The applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, and given an SPD code of “JKA”; therefore, he was properly assigned an RE code of RE-3.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080004121

    Original file (AR20080004121.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in her own behalf. On 3 May 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007461

    Original file (AR20130007461.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She was 20 years old at the time of her reenlistment and had a high school letter. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. However, Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015522

    Original file (20080015522.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show her foreign service in Iraq. The applicant states, in effect, she deployed with members of her unit, Company E, 3rd Battalion, 227th Aviation Regiment, to Iraq during the period 2 February 2007 through 25 June 2007; however, her DD Form 214 does not reflect this. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001584

    Original file (AR20130001584.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 1 August 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. The applicant contends that she had good service which included a combat tour in Iraq.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110020127

    Original file (AR20110020127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? My only issue was the fact my ex-husband harassed my command in regards to the support and my command knew I was actively fighting it with the state of Michigan. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 16 February 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, pattern of misconduct, for making false official statements, and failing to obey a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003358

    Original file (20080003358.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his Certificate of Release Or Discharge From Active Duty (DD Form 214) entry in Item 12C (Net Active Service This Period) be deleted (001-11-17) and add (02-09-09) and Item 29 (Dates of Time Lost During This Period) be deleted (20060724-20070408 and 20070412-20070522 be corrected to show lost time (20070510-20070513). The DD Form 214, he was issued contains an entry in Item 12c (Net Service This Period) contains the entry "0001 11 17," which indicates...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110023363

    Original file (AR20110023363.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 4 April 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for going AWOL three times, missing movement of her company to Iraq, and a serious record of FTR's, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 18 April 2007, the separation authority waived further...