Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020485
Original file (20140020485.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  21 July 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140020485 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he transferred his educational benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

2.  The applicant states upon his retirement from the military he was not informed of how to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill to his dependents.  He stayed in the Army for an extra 3 years so he could transfer his benefits to his dependents.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 31 July 2014.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 22 March 1991.  On 31 July 2014, he retired from the Regular Army.  He completed 23 years, 4 months, and 9 days of net active service this period.  He attained 20 years of active service on 21 March 2011.

2.  Department of Defense (DOD) Directive-Type Memorandum 09-003, dated 22 June 2009, established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members.

	a.  An eligible individual is any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of the individual's request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and:

		(1)  has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election, or

		(2)  has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either standard policy (Service or DOD) or statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agrees to serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or statute.

		(3)  Soldiers who attained 20 years of service on or after 2 August 2010 and before 2 August 2011, 2 years of additional service from the date or request are required.

	b.  An individual approved to transfer entitlement to educational assistance may transfer such entitlement to the individual's family member(s) only while serving as a member of the Armed Forces.

3.  Military Personnel Message Number 12-102 was issued on 15 April 2013 to emphasize that all Post 9/11 GI Bill TEB requests submitted and approved on/after 1 August 2013 will incur a 4-year service obligation from the TEB request date, regardless of years in service (except when precluded by either policy or statue from committing an additional 4 years).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  He contends he was not informed of how to transfer his Post-911 GI Bill benefits to his dependents at the time of his retirement.

2.  The applicant was eligible to transfer benefits to his dependents at any time after 1 August 2009.

	a.  If he had requested a TEB at the time he attained 20 years active service on 22 March 2011 he would have been required to agree to service an additional 2 years of active service.

	b.  If his request to transfer his Post-9/11 benefits was submitted and approved on/after 1 August 2013 he would have been required to incur a 4-year service obligation from the TEB request date.

3.  The DOD, Department of Veterans Affairs, and the Army conducted a public campaign plan that generated communications through military, public, and social media venues.  The information was published well in advance with emphasis on the criteria.  While there may have been some confusion during the early stages after the implementation, the applicant was retired over 4 years after the program was implemented.

4.  In view of the above, there is no basis upon which to grant relief in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140020485



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140020485



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005370

    Original file (20130005370.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he made a timely application, prior to his effective date of retirement, to transfer his unused education benefits to his eligible dependent, in accordance with the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his unused education benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill prior to his retirement date of 31 August 2009. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019514

    Original file (20130019514.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he transferred his educational benefits to his sons under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The Army did not have a record of his GI Bill. Records show the applicant was eligible to transfer his educational benefits under the TEB prior to retirement, but there is no convincing evidence showing he did so.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002773

    Original file (20120002773.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant had 16 years of service as of the program’s implementation date of 1 August 2009; therefore, he was eligible to transfer to either his spouse or his children. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of reserve service. The applicant did not and could not have requested a transfer of his benefits to his dependents on 3 June 2009.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009431

    Original file (20120009431.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that the Army National Guard (ARNG) did not properly inform him during the time of his retirement that he could transfer his education benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement from the ARNG. The advisory official stated the applicant was eligible for Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits; however, he did not complete a request to transfer benefit on the Department of Defense's (DOD's) TEB online database before he left the service. Contrary to the basis for the approval...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003367

    Original file (20130003367.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he transferred his education benefits under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his dependents in March 2011. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service. f. A child may use the benefit while the eligible individual remains in the Armed Forces or after separation from active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009851

    Original file (20140009851.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    HRC advised that when the applicant elected to transfer his Post 9-11 GI Bill benefits to his eligible dependents, he was assigned a service obligation date of 18 August 2011. The milConnect website and his approval letter both informed him that he had a service obligation date through 18 August 2011. The applicant agreed to serve through 18 August 2011.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001932

    Original file (20140001932.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy to transfer educational benefits to his spouse under the transfer of educational benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The record shows that upon transferring his education benefits to his dependents his TEB Obligation End Date was determined to be 4 December 2015. The evidence of record shows the applicant was selected for QMP and retired on 30 November 2013.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014059

    Original file (20140014059.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he transferred Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his dependents in December 2010. When he went through the process of transferring his Montgomery GI Bill to the Post-9/11 GI Bill in December 2010 he was counseled that he would incur a 4-year service obligation. A TEB request cannot be approved without this information.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020978

    Original file (20120020978.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DOD policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and document accordingly and maintain records for individuals who receive supplemental educational assistance under Public Law 110-252, section 3316. The evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his unused education benefits under the TEB provision of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001727

    Original file (20130001727.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DOD policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and document accordingly and maintain records for individuals who receive supplemental educational assistance under Public Law 110-252, section 3316. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing...