Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014059
Original file (20140014059.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  9 October 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140014059 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he transferred Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his dependents in December 2010.  

2.  He states:

	a.  When he went through the process of transferring his Montgomery GI Bill to the Post-9/11 GI Bill in December 2010 he was counseled that he would incur a 4-year service obligation.  The only reason he elected to transfer education benefits (TEB) at that time is that the service obligation aligned nearly perfectly with his planned retirement date.  He was not made aware that he needed to transfer 1 month of benefits to any family member to start the clock.  

	b.  He was told by counselors at the Fort Campbell, KY, education center that the transfer to the Post-9/11 GI Bill resulted in a 4-year service obligation and would allow his family to utilize unused education benefits.  Now he is only 1 year from retirement and had expected his service obligation to end in December 2014.  There was no logical reason he wouldn't have assigned at least 1 month of benefits in December 2010 if he had been given accurate information on the relatively new program.  

3.  He provides no additional evidence in support of his request.



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 13 May 1994, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army, and he served in an enlisted status through 12 November 2002.  On 13 November 2002, he accepted appointment as a warrant officer and has continued his active duty service in that status.  He is currently serving as a chief warrant officer three.  

2.  His transaction history in the Integrated Web Service shows he transferred Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his dependents on 9 July 2014.  As a result, he incurred a service obligation through 8 July 2018.   

3.  His record is void of documentation showing he attempted to transfer Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents prior to 9 July 2014.  

4.  Department of Defense (DOD) Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) 09-003, dated 22 June 2009, established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members.
	
	a.  Eligible individuals include members of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of their request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, are eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and have at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agree to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. 

	b.  Months transferred must be in whole months.  An individual transferring an entitlement to educational assistance shall, through notification to the Secretary of the Military Department concerned:

		(1)  designate the dependent or dependents to whom such entitlement is being transferred;

		(2)  designate the number of months of such entitlement to be transferred to each dependent; and

		(3)  specify the period for which the transfer shall be effective for each dependent.

5.  During the implementation phase of the program (the first 90 days), many Soldiers were unaware of the requirements for transferring Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits.  The Army, DOD, and VA initiated a massive public campaign that generated major communications through military, public, and social media venues on the Post-9/11 GI Bill and transfer of benefits.
6.  Military Personnel (MILPER) Message Number 13-102, title:  Post 9/11 GI Bill TEB Four-Year Service Obligation for Approved TEB Requests Submitted On/After 1 [August 2013], dated 15 April 2013, was issued to emphasize that all TEB requests submitted on or after 1 August 2013 would incur a 4-year service obligation from the TEB request date regardless of years in service (except when precluded by policy or statute from committing to an additional 4 years).  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant claims that he attempted to elect TEB in December 2010, well after the program began.  DOD DTM 09-003 provides clear instructions regarding TEB.  These instructions include a requirement to designate dependents, designate the number of months to be transferred to each dependent, and specify the period for which the transfer would be effective for each dependent.  A TEB request cannot be approved without this information.  

2.  He has provided no documentary evidence to support his contention that he was given inaccurate information on applying for TEB.  In the absence of such evidence, there is no basis for granting the requested relief.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
      
      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140014059





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140014059



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017538

    Original file (20110017538.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) 09-003, subject: Post-9/11 GI Bill, refers to 15 years to use benefits and then refers to a requirement to be on active duty to transfer benefits. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve Component service. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004580

    Original file (20140004580.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the date he transferred his education benefits under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his dependents be changed to 12 May 2010. He submitted a screen shot of his TEB request to transfer his education benefits to his three children. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he filed his application to transfer his educational benefits to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01703

    Original file (BC 2013 01703.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He would have transferred his MGIB benefits to the Post-9/11 Bill if he would have known that MGIB transferability to dependents went away and/or that his ADSC would have been waived if he transferred to the Post-9/11 GI Bill. He was not provided the proper information pertaining to the GI Bill benefits or transferring his education benefits to the Post-9/11 GI Bill. While the applicant contends he was unaware that he could not transfer the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) (Chapter 30) to his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013353

    Original file (20130013353.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    , dated 14 December 2012 * Memorandum, Subject: Request for Implementation of the Proposed Policy to Allow Officers Who are Twice Non-Selected for Promotion to Colonel (COL) to have the 4-year MSO Shortened if They Seek to Retire, dated 29 January 2013 * Post 911 GI Bill Frequently Asked Questions * Memorandum, Subject: Request for Voluntary Retirement, dated 6 December 2012 * Milconnect Transfer of Education Benefits CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. In her request, she stated that she...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140020958

    Original file (AR20140020958.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her record to show her request to transfer her education benefits to her eligible dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill was approved. The applicant provides: * Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff (DCS), G-1, Director of Military Personnel Management (DMPM), denial of applicant's request for a TEB exception to policy * information paper * emails * website screen printout of her TEB request * excerpts...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007393

    Original file (20140007393 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show his request to transfer his education benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill was approved. It stated: * officers who elected the TEB prior to SERB selection would retain their transfer and not face recoupment if they agreed to serve until the mandatory separation date established by the SERB * officers electing voluntary retirement in lieu of the SERB consideration...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007393

    Original file (20140007393.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show his request to transfer his education benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill was approved. It stated: * officers who elected the TEB prior to SERB selection would retain their transfer and not face recoupment if they agreed to serve until the mandatory separation date established by the SERB * officers electing voluntary retirement in lieu of the SERB consideration...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001932

    Original file (20140001932.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy to transfer educational benefits to his spouse under the transfer of educational benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The record shows that upon transferring his education benefits to his dependents his TEB Obligation End Date was determined to be 4 December 2015. The evidence of record shows the applicant was selected for QMP and retired on 30 November 2013.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019755

    Original file (20130019755.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was never contacted by a reenlistment NCO or a Career Counselor to discuss the benefit. The form also stated that he had 19 years, 7 months, and 16 days of eligible service at the time of the second request. When he applied for TEB in 2009, he had not completed the required 20 years of service; therefore, his request was denied.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001461

    Original file (20140001461.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides no additional evidence. The available evidence does not support the applicant's request for correction of his record to show he submitted a timely application to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his dependents. In the absence of evidence indicating the applicant was unfairly deprived of the opportunity to apply for TEB prior to retiring, there is an insufficient basis upon which to grant the requested relief.