Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020189
Original file (20140020189 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  4 August 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140020189


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  his childhood history indicates, as the second eldest of eight children, he grew up fast learning how to share and work through his employment in helping his father in the hardware store, in the funeral home, as well as assisting in the running of the local ambulance; and

	b.  his military history specifically details his combat service in Vietnam where he was shot at and was around more mortar fire than a lot of infantry personnel deserving of the CIB.

3.  The applicant provides a self-authored statement.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 

3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 13 June 1968.  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 12C (Bridge Specialist).

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam from 8 March through 29 August 1969 and was assigned to engineer units performing the duties of a bridge specialist in MOS 12C.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not include the CIB.

4.  His military records are void of any orders or documents that indicate he was recommended for or awarded the CIB while serving in Vietnam or at any other time during his military service.

5.  On 30 April 1970, the applicant was honorably released from active duty in the temporary rank/grade of sergeant/E-5.  He completed 1 year, 10 months, and 18 days of total active service.

6.  His DD Form 214 does not include the CIB among the awards listed.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army's awards policy.  Paragraph 8-6 contains the CIB criteria and requires that the member be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties; be assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size during such time as the unit was engaged in active ground combat; and be present with his qualifying infantry unit and actively participate in such ground combat.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the CIB.  However, in order to support award of the CIB, there must be evidence that the member held an infantry MOS; served in a qualifying infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size; and was present and participated with that unit when it was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces.

2.  The evidence of record in this case shows the applicant served in primary MOS 12C as a bridge specialist.  There is no evidence of record showing he ever held or served in an infantry MOS while assigned to a qualifying infantry unit during his RVN tour or was present and participated with a qualifying infantry unit while it was engaged in active ground combat.  Accordingly, there is no evidence to confirm he met the eligibility requirements necessary to support award of the CIB.

3.  In view of the above, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140020189





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140020189



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020544

    Original file (20120020544.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provides that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. With respect to award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, the evidence of record shows that the applicant was trained in and awarded an engineer MOS following completion of training and served in that MOS in an engineer battalion in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002802

    Original file (20110002802.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show these awards. There is no evidence in the available record which shows the applicant was either recommended for or awarded the CIB. There is no evidence showing he was ever awarded or recommended for award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014005

    Original file (20090014005.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in the applicant's records that show he was awarded the CIB. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB. During the Vietnam era, the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020683

    Original file (20120020683.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His military records are void of any orders or documents that indicate he was recommended for or awarded the CIB while serving in Vietnam or at any other time during his military service. In addition, the evidence of record fails to show the applicant was awarded the CIB. ____________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013483

    Original file (20080013483.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    By regulation, in order to qualify for the CIB, in addition to being an infantryman performing infantry duties, and being assigned to an infantry unit when the unit is engaged in active ground combat, the applicant must also show that he was actively participating in ground combat. The evidence in the applicant's official record shows he held MOS 11D and performed duties as a rifleman for his entire period of service in the RVN while assigned to an infantry unit. Given the above, and in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021834

    Original file (20090021834.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no indication in the applicant's records that he held an infantry MOS and/or was assigned to an infantry unit during his military service. The evidence of record shows he held an engineer MOS and was assigned to a supply and/or support unit during his service in Vietnam. In the absence of evidence that he held an infantry MOS and actively participated in combat while assigned to an infantry unit, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Combat Infantryman...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001036

    Original file (20140001036.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: a. upgrade of his Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device for heroism on 11 March 1968 to the Silver Star; and b. correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * BSM with "V" Device *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001035

    Original file (20090001035.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The exigencies of combat may require non-infantry Soldiers to temporarily perform the basic infantry duties that all Soldiers are taught but it is not a basis for the award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. Holding an infantry MOS (which the applicant did not), being assigned to a qualifying unit (which the applicant was not), and receiving campaign or battle credit alone are not sufficient to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006782

    Original file (20080006782.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    During its original review of the case, the Board found no evidence of record that showed the applicant served in active ground combat while an assigned member of an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size, and as a result, concluded there was insufficient evidence to support award of the CIB. Further, the evidence provided by the applicant places him with his qualifying infantry unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces in the RVN. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019270

    Original file (20110019270.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. he held military occupational specialties (MOS) 11B (Infantryman) and 11D (Armor Reconnaissance Specialist) during his service in Vietnam from May - August 1968; b. he was assigned to a cavalry unit rifle squad while engaged in active dismounted ground combat many times; c. he was also engaged in combat under enemy fire with his infantry unit; and d. he was awarded the Purple Heart (PH) on 18 July 1968 while he was engaged in combat. The applicant's official...