Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020154
Original file (20140020154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  28 July 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140020154 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded.

2.  The applicant states:

     a.  His conviction and discharge were inequitable because they were based on his pre-service civilian conviction that was properly listed in his enlistment documents.

     b.  His request is not for his personal benefit but for the support of his children.  By granting his upgrade he would be afforded the opportunity to support his family financially.

     c.  He is fully aware of the consequences of his poor decisions.  He is very remorseful and wants to apologize to the Army, his family, and most importantly the women he hurt.  

     d.  He takes pride in how he carries himself and he is very regretful for his actions.  People of character do the right thing not because they think it would change the world but because they refuse to be changed by the world.

     e.  Character takes courage.  Courage is not freedom from fear but freedom from being frozen by it.  You cannot change mistakes that you have made but you can learn from them and by doing so you can discover the true worth of having good character.   

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and his General Court-Martial Order (GCMO).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 October 2008.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 92A (Automated Logistical).  The highest rank he attained was sergeant.

2.  GCMO Number 20, issued by Headquarters, Fort Campbell, Fort Campbell, KY, dated 5 September 2013 shows that based on a plea agreement he was found guilty of:

* maltreating Specialist D.W. on or about 15 February 2012 and on or about 1 April 2012 by using sexually explicit language
* maltreating Private First Class S.H. on or about 30 March 2012 by using sexually explicit language 

3.  His sentence consisted of reduction to the rank/grade of private/E-1, confinement for 90 days, and a BCD. The sentence was approved and except for the part of the sentence extending to a BCD, was ordered executed. 

4.  His DD Form 214 shows, on 28 February 2014, he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 3, by reason of court-martial.  This form further lists his character of service as "bad conduct."

5.  Army Regulation 635-200 governs the separation of enlisted personnel.  

	a.  Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.

	b.  Paragraph 3-7b provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.  

	c.  Paragraph 3-10 provides that a Soldier will be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial.  The appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed.

6.  Court-martial convictions stand as adjudged or modified by appeal through the judicial process.  In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the ABCMR is not empowered to set aside a conviction.  Rather, it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate.  Clemency is an act of mercy or instance of leniency to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1. The applicant contends his conviction and discharge were inequitable because they were based on a pre-service conviction; however, he was convicted by a general court-martial of maltreating two Soldiers during his period of service. 

2.  The court sentenced him to confinement, reduction to the lowest enlisted grade, and a BCD.  His trial by a general court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged.  Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterized the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.  

3.  Any redress by this Board of the finality of a court-martial conviction is prohibited by law.  The Board is only empowered to change a discharge if clemency is determined to be appropriate to moderate the severity of the sentence imposed.  Absent any mitigating factors, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate.  As a result, clemency is not warranted in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140020154





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140020154



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015275

    Original file (20140015275.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 May 1988, the U.S. Army Court of Military Review issued a decision affirming the findings of guilty and the sentence in the applicant's case. The separation authority is paragraph 3-11 (Bad Conduct Discharge), Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel). His conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and his discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000575

    Original file (20150000575.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. His conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted. Therefore, the applicant's service is insufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable or a general discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004433

    Original file (20120004433.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge (BCD) to an honorable discharge. A DD Form 458 (Charge Sheet), dated 28 July 1971, was prepared by the Commander, Troop D, 4th Squadron, 12th Cavalry, Fort Carson, CO, showing the applicant was charged with one specification of wrongfully dispersing by selling to another Soldier a controlled drug (amphetamine) on or about 21 July 1971. His sentence and conviction were affirmed and the BCD was ordered executed.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019462

    Original file (20110019462.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 April 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110019462 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. This form also shows his character of service as "Under Conditions Other Than Honorable." Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006870

    Original file (20120006870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 November 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120006870 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides: * retirement orders in the grade of CSM/E-9, dated 27 June 2011 * revocation orders, dated 7 July 2011 * retirement orders in the grade of SPC/E-4, dated 7 July 2011 * Unit/Installation Clearance Record * DA Form 31 (Request and Authority for Leave) * Enlisted Record Brief CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record shows he was promoted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003782

    Original file (20150003782.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is not available in the applicant's service record). The applicant was discharged accordingly. His conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and his discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012760

    Original file (20110012760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 January 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110012760 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge be upgraded. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013008

    Original file (20140013008.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was discharged accordingly on 25 July 1986, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 3, as a result of a court-martial with a bad conduct discharge. a. Paragraph 3-11 states a Soldier will be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005522

    Original file (20120005522.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the ABCMR is not empowered to set aside a conviction. Further, the available evidence confirms the applicant had an extensive disciplinary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003858

    Original file (20140003858.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 November 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140003858 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to an honorable discharge. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.