Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019383
Original file (20140019383.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  23 June 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140019383 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his reentry eligibility (RE) code.

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  His RE code should be changed because his condition has the possibility of being cured or at least controlled by medication, making it possible for him to carry out his military occupational specialty and job.

	b.  Working helped him keep his mind busy as well as being around people who supported him and cared for him.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DA Form 199 (Informal Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings)
* Integrated Disability Evaluation System (DES) Narrative Summary
* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Having prior inactive service in the U.S. Army Reserve and Army National Guard (ARNG), the applicant enlisted in the ARNG on 12 November 2004.  He was ordered to active duty on 7 March 2012.



2.  On 18 September 2013, a PEB found the applicant unfit due to:

* panic disorder without agoraphobia
* left shoulder rotator cuff tear
* intervertebral disc disease

3.  The PEB recommended his retirement due to permanent disability (60 percent).

4.  On 14 April 2014, he retired by reason of permanent disability (enhanced) after completing over 16 years of active Federal service.

5.  His DD Form 214 shows in:

* item 25 (Separation Authority) – Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), chapter 4
* item 26 (Separation Code) – SEJ
* item 27 (Reentry Code) – 4R
* item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) – Disability, Permanent (Enhanced)

6.  All Army Activities Message 147/2008, dated 13 June 2008, subject:  Implementation of New Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes for the Disability-Related Provisions of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) 2008 and the DES Pilot Program, implemented new SPD codes for disability-related provisions of the NDAA 2008 and the DES Pilot Program.  Sixteen new SPD codes were added, including SPD code SEJ (Disability, Permanent (Enhanced) (Mandatory retirement resulting from permanent physical disability in accordance with Army Regulation 635-40, chapter 4).

7.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing in the Regular Army, U.S. Army Reserve, and ARNG.  Table 3-1 provides a list of RE codes.

	a.  RE code 1 applies to persons completing an initial term of active service who were fully qualified when last separated.

	b.  RE code 3 applies to persons who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at the time of separation but disqualification is waivable.

	c.  RE code 4R applies to persons who retired.  They are ineligible for enlistment.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions were carefully considered.  However, the evidence of record confirms his RE code was assigned based on his retirement under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, chapter 4.  The RE code associated with this type of discharge is 4R.

2.  His RE code was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations at the time of his retirement.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting his requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140019383



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140019383



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002663

    Original file (20130002663.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his separation program designator (SPD) code as "SFJ" instead of "SEJ." The SPD code of "SFJ" is the correct code for Soldiers separating under Army Regulation 635-40, chapter 4 by reason of permanent disability that is non-combat related. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008417

    Original file (20110008417.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 2 February 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110008417 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states her orders were amended and changed her separation date; however, her DD Form 214 was not correctly accordingly. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008737

    Original file (20140008737.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * extracts of his military medical records and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical records * VA Form 21-0819 (VA/Department of Defense (DOD) Joint Disability Evaluation Board Claim) * VA Disability Evaluation System (DES) Proposed Rating, dated 26 August 2011 * VA rating letter, dated 29 August 2011 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) establishes the Army Physical Disability...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026188

    Original file (20100026188.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that item 28 shows "disability, severance pay, non-combat related," but his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) states his disability did result from a combat-related injury as defined by Title 26, U.S. Code, section 104. Item 26 (Separation Code) of his DD Form 214 shows the entry "JFO" and item 28 shows the entry "disability, severance pay, non-combat related." a. SPD code of JFI is appropriate when the narrative reason for discharge is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026746

    Original file (20100026746.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was retired from active duty on 23 September 2008 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(2), by reason of temporary disability with a corresponding SPD code of SFK. Therefore, he received the appropriate reason for separation and SPD code associated with his retirement from active duty and he is not entitled to the requested relief. A member may be found fit for duty, permanently retired, extended on the TDRL, or separated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010606

    Original file (20140010606.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) * DA Form 3947 (Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) Proceedings) * Multiple Standard Form 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care) * DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status) * Multiple consults, sick call slips, and chronological records of medical care * Other service and civilian medical records CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Although the PEB recommended his separation with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004876

    Original file (20130004876.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * the reason for separation should be "Disability, Severance Pay, Combat Related" not "Disability, Severance Pay, Non-Combat (Enhanced)" * his DD Form 199 (Informal Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) shows his disability did result from a combat-related injury 3. NDAA 2008, section 1646 (Enhancement of Disability Severance Pay) provides that no deductions may be made from severance pay of service members rated less than 30 percent disability with less than 20...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024492

    Original file (20110024492.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) shows his disability as combat-related and his separation orders also indicate his disability resulted from a combat-related injury. He was discharged from active duty on 16 August 2011 in the rank of SFC under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), chapter 4, by reason of disability, severance pay, non-combat (enhanced). ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014935

    Original file (20080014935.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation), of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), be corrected to show the entry "Disability, Severance Pay, Combat Related" instead of the entry "Disability, Severance Pay, Non-Combat Related." The evidence of record shows the applicant was honorably discharged, on 13 August 2008, by reason of physical disability, under the provision of Army Regulation 635-40 and IAW NDAA 2008, due...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024581

    Original file (20110024581.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 10c of the proceedings shows the disability did result from a combat-related injury as defined in Title 26, U.S. Code, section 104. c. Item 10d states the disability was not incurred in a combat zone or incurred during the performance of duty in combat-related operations as designated by the Secretary of Defense in accordance with the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) 2008, section 1646. b. SPD code JFO for disability, severance pay, noncombat-related, is used for a discharge...