Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026746
Original file (20100026746.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  24 May 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100026746 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of item 26 (Separation Code) and item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was discharged because of permanent disability vice temporary disability.

2.  The applicant states his DD Form 214 was issued in September 2008 while he was on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL).  Orders issued on 22 March 2010 state he was removed from the TDRL and discharged because of a permanent disability and the disability is combat-related.  Therefore, the reason for separation should be JFI (Disability, Severance Pay, Combat Related) or JEA (Disability, Severance Pay, Combat Related (Enhanced)).  A swift response would be appreciated as this will stop the current recoupment of his severance pay.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and orders.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 August 2005 and he held military occupational specialty 15T (UH-60 Helicopter Repairer).  He was assigned to the 4th Aviation Brigade, Fort Hood, TX.

2.  On 12 June 2008, a physical evaluation board (PEB) convened to consider the applicant's disability of mild and persistent asthma that prevented him from wearing the chemical protective mask and required daily medications.  The PEB found his medical and physical impairments prevented reasonable performance of duties required by his grade and military specialty.  The PEB placed him on the TDRL because his conditions were not sufficiently stable for final adjudication.  On 19 June 2008, he concurred with the findings and recommendations of the PEB.

3.  He was honorably retired from active duty on 23 September 2008, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), paragraph 4-24b(2), by reason of temporary disability.  He completed 3 years, 1 month, and 21 days of creditable active service.  Item 26 (Separation Code) of his DD Form 214 contains the entry "SFK."

4.  On 11 February 2010, a TDRL PEB convened to consider the applicant's disability of asthma that became worse with exercise.  Based on the TDRL examination, the PEB found he remained unfit to reasonably perform the duties required by his grade and military specialty.  The PEB also found his condition was sufficiently stable for final adjudication, he should be permanently retired, and the disability was incurred in a combat zone or during the performance of duty in combat-related operations.  On 27 February 2010, he received the findings and recommendations of the PEB, but he failed to respond or make an election.

5.  U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) Orders Number D081-81, dated 22 March 2010, removed him from the TDRL and discharged him from the Army effective 22 March 2010 because of permanent physical disability with a 
10-percent disability rating and entitlement to severance pay based on 6 years of service.  The orders also state the disability was incurred in a combat zone or incurred during the performance of duty in combat-related operations.

6.  Army Regulation 635-40 establishes the Army Physical Disability Evaluation System and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his office, grade, rank, or rating.  Paragraph 4-24b states that upon final decision of the USAPDA or Army Physical Disability Board, an individual would be issued retirement orders or orders for placement on the TDRL.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) states the SPD codes are three-character alphabetic combinations which identify reasons for and types of separation from active duty.  The primary purpose of SPD codes is to provide statistical accounting of reasons for separation.  They are intended exclusively for the internal use of the Department of Defense and the Military Services to assist in the collection and analysis of separation data.  This regulation shows the SPD code of SFK is the appropriate code for Soldiers retired from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(2), by reason of temporary disability.

8.  All Army Activities Message 147/2008, dated 13 June 2008, subject:  Implementation of new SPD codes for disability-related provisions of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) 2008 and the Disability Evaluation System (DES) Pilot Program implements new SPD codes for disability related provisions of the fiscal year 2008 NDAA and the DES Pilot Program.  This message states that the Department of Defense Memorandum, dated 13 March 2008, directed the implementation of the following four new SPD codes pertaining to the rating conditions and the calculation of disability severance pay:  JFI, JFO, JEA, and JEB.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  In pertinent part, it states the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  Paragraph 2-1(a)(2) specifies that a DD Form 214 will be prepared for active Army Soldiers on termination of active duty.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant suffered a medical condition that warranted his entry into the PDES.  He appears to have been considered by a medical evaluation board that referred him to a PEB.  The PEB found his medical condition unfitting at the time.  The PEB recommended placing him on the TDRL because his condition at the time was not sufficiently stable for final adjudication.  Therefore, it did not recommend a permanent rating.

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was retired from active duty on 23 September 2008 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(2), by reason of temporary disability with a corresponding SPD code of SFK.  The DD Form 214 is meant to show the status of a Soldier on the last day of active duty.  At that time, he was retired for disability; the new SPDs do not apply to disability retirement.  Therefore, he received the appropriate reason for separation and SPD code associated with his retirement from active duty and he is not entitled to the requested relief.

3.  The disposition of a member's disability rating might change while on the TDRL.  A member may be found fit for duty, permanently retired, extended on the TDRL, or separated with severance pay.  In his case, his TDRL evaluation found he remained unfit to reasonably perform the duties required of his specialty and grade, but his condition had stabilized enough for final adjudication.  Accordingly, the TDRL PEB recommended his separation with entitlement to severance pay.

4.  His records contain orders which removed him from the TDRL and discharged him from the Army effective 22 March 2010 because of permanent physical disability with entitlement to severance pay.  These orders also state the disability was incurred in a combat zone or incurred during the performance of duty in combat-related operations and are sufficient documentary evidence to show his disability was combat-related.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_x___  _____x___  _____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100026746



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100026746



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015363

    Original file (20100015363.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * his DD Form 214 with effective date 20080605 * Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) letter dated 19 April 2010 * his DD Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings * DA Form 3947 (Medical Evaluation Board [MEB] Proceedings) * MEB Narrative Summary (NARSUM) 4. The PEB rated him under the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and, as shown in items 8a, 8b, and 8g (Disability Description, VA Code, Percentage), he was granted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003627

    Original file (20090003627.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant entered the Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) and underwent an MEBD proceeding on 13 December 2007. It shows that Soldiers involuntarily discharged under the authority of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(3) by reason of disability with severance pay will be assigned SPD Code “JFL.” Furthermore, Army Regulation 635-5-1 does not contain SPD Codes “JFI” or JEA.” DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant’s SPD Code has nothing to do with whether or not his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014935

    Original file (20080014935.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation), of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), be corrected to show the entry "Disability, Severance Pay, Combat Related" instead of the entry "Disability, Severance Pay, Non-Combat Related." The evidence of record shows the applicant was honorably discharged, on 13 August 2008, by reason of physical disability, under the provision of Army Regulation 635-40 and IAW NDAA 2008, due...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024492

    Original file (20110024492.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) shows his disability as combat-related and his separation orders also indicate his disability resulted from a combat-related injury. He was discharged from active duty on 16 August 2011 in the rank of SFC under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), chapter 4, by reason of disability, severance pay, non-combat (enhanced). ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020718

    Original file (20120020718.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Orders Number D032-32, dated 25 January 2010, issued by the USAPDA, removed the applicant from the TDRL and permanently retired her due to physical disability with a 50% disability rating. Army Regulation 601-210 further states that individuals who have been permanently retired by reason of physical disability may not receive a waiver to reenlist. She provides insufficient evidence to show she was not medically unfit for retention at the time she was placed on the TDRL or at the time she...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010606

    Original file (20140010606.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) * DA Form 3947 (Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) Proceedings) * Multiple Standard Form 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care) * DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status) * Multiple consults, sick call slips, and chronological records of medical care * Other service and civilian medical records CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Although the PEB recommended his separation with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065073C070421

    Original file (2001065073C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that item 28 of her DD Form 214 should show the entry “Temporarily Retired due to Disability” instead of the entry “Disability, Severance Pay.” In support of her application, she submits copies of: her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile); Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination); Standard Form 93 (Report of Medical History); DA Form 5181-R (Screening Note of Acute Medical Care); Medical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022411

    Original file (20100022411.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 shows he was retired in accordance with Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), paragraph 4-24b(2), by reason of temporary disability. The regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The applicant’s retirement was based on the fact that he underwent a PEB that found him physically unfit to perform duties...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022412

    Original file (20100022412.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 8 August 2010, a PEB determined his condition had not improved to the extent that he was fit for duty and recommended he be removed from the TDRL, given a disability rating of 0 percent, and be given severance pay. The regulation shows the narrative reason for this type of separation is "Disability, Temporary." Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) states prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016808

    Original file (20090016808.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    a. SPD code "JFI" for disability, severance pay, combat-related, is used for discharge resulting from physical disability with combat-related severance pay and entitlement. b. SPD code "JFO" for disability, severance pay, non-combat related, is used for discharge resulting from physical disability with non-combat related severance pay and entitlement. c. SPD code "JEA" for disability, severance pay, non-combat related (enhanced), is used for discharge resulting from physical disability...