Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018835
Original file (20140018835.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  23 June 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140018835 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous request for correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report or Transfer or Discharge) to show the spelling of his last name as "CHANDLER."

2.  The applicant states:

* when he joined the Army at 17 years of age he noticed that his name was misspelled on his birth certificate
* his grandmother told the recruiter the doctor who filled out the birth certificate made a mistake because she could not read or write
* the recruiter instructed him to fill out his enlistment documents
* the recruiter assured them that the Army would help to correct it after he enlisted
* he asked his commanding officers for help with negative results and was told it was not a priority
* he was proud to be a Soldier and thought that he would continue his education and get his birth certificate corrected but that was not the case
* he was trained as an infantryman with people that did not want to be in the Army and he was criticized for wanting to help his country
* when he asked to be transferred to the Vietnam, he was told that he was too young and he was assigned to Alaska
* after he turned 18 he was told he could not go to Vietnam because he was his mother’s only son
* when he went to get eyeglasses while in Alaska he signed his last name "CHANDLER " as had been doing his whole life because he forgot to use the name he was instructed to use by the recruiter
* he has served his country his whole life as a Soldier on active duty and in the Army National Guard  and as a decorated police officer    
* he has received many post service accomplishments   
* in the past year he had his last name corrected on his birth certificate

3.  The applicant provides:

* self-authored statement
* DD Form 214
* birth certificates
* National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service)
* information pertaining to post service accomplishments

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20130004541 on 21 October 2013.

2.  The applicant's military records contain a DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History) that he completed during his enlistment processing.  It includes both his and his father's name and lists his last name as "CHANLER."

3.  The DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract – Armed Forces of the United States) prepared during his enlistment processing shows his last name as "CHANLER."  The applicant also authenticated this document by signing the same last name.

4.  On 19 January 1968, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army.  The DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) prepared upon his entry on active duty lists his last name as "CHANLER."

5.  On a DA Form 428 (Application for Identification Card), dated                         24 January 1968, it appears he signed his last name "CHANDLER." 

6.  A DD Form 771 (Spectacles Prescription), dated 6 September 1968, lists his last name as "CHANDLER."

7.  On 15 January 1970, the applicant was released from active duty.  His DD Form 214 lists the same last name as recorded on his DD Form 4, DA Form 20, and other documents filed in his military records.

8.  An NGB Form 22 issued subsequent to his release from active duty lists his last name as "CHANDLER."  

9.  He provides a birth certificate that shows last name as "CHANDLER."

10.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although most of the applicant's service records contain documents showing his last name as "CHANLER", evidence shows that on at least one occasion he signed his name as "CHANDLER."  

2.  His service records contain documents showing his last name as both "CHANLER" and "CHANDLER."  His birth certificate and his NGB 22 show his last name as "CHANDLER"; however, his DD Form 214 shows his name as "CHANLER."

3.   The inconsistent use of his last name may create administrative problems and could raise questions for the applicant in the future.

4.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show his last name as "CHANDLER" as shown on his NGB Form 22.  

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant an amendment of the ABCMR decision in Docket Number AR20130004541, dated 21 October 2013.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the name on his DD Form 214 and replacing it with the name that is listed on his NGB Form 22.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140018835



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140018835



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004541

    Original file (20130004541.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) prepared upon his entry on active duty lists his last name as "CHANLER." While his military records include a single document that lists his last name as "CHANDLER," this prescription prepared by a medical professional alone is insufficient to negate all other documents on file in face of the applicant's admission that his name of record is the same...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019183

    Original file (20130019183.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A memorandum published by NGB on 26 September 2012, Subject: Announcement of Approved Exception to Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 1205.21, RC Incentives Program Procedures, paragraph 5b states PAs are eligible for Special Pay Bonus in the amount of $15,000 per year. She signed another contract for the Special Pay Bonus for $20,000 per year and then another contract for $15,000 per year. The applicant was not eligible to contract for the incentive until the ETP list was approved.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008011

    Original file (20110008011.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant has provided documents showing his DOB as 10 August 1941 and his last name as ******k. 5. The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document along with his application will be filed in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022508

    Original file (20120022508.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His transfer was to take effect 15 July 2001 and he kept SFC C----- informed as to the progress of his promotion and requested he look for an E-8 position anywhere within the state. According to the UMR's he provided there were four available E-8 positions: two 1SG positions, an operations sergeant position, and an intelligence sergeant position. He was promoted by the TXARNG to E-8 just prior to the transfer, but he was placed in an E-7 position by the AKARNG.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011298

    Original file (20100011298.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the first name recorded in his military records be corrected. The evidence of record shows that, subsequent to the period of military service under review, a Delayed Certificate of Birth was issued showing the applicant's name is "FERNANDO A----- T-----." In this regard, the evidence of record shows that the applicant's military service records reflect the correct name (at the time) under which military service was performed.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008908

    Original file (20090008908.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant enlisted in both the USAR and the RA under the preferred last name of B------g. The fact that he now, more than 37 years after his release from active duty, requests that the last name recorded in his military records be changed from B------g to H----y is not a sufficiently mitigating factor that warrants granting this requested relief,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006605

    Original file (20130006605.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He (SSG C____ L. L____) signed the form as the witness and told them he would mail it to the higher headquarters. The FSM's records indicate he elected to participate in the RCSBP within 90 days of receiving his 20-year letter and his spouse concurred with this election. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * showing the FSM timely submitted an RCSBP election for spouse-only coverage based on the full amount...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021211

    Original file (20140021211.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete military records are not available to the Board for review. The DD Form 214 issued the applicant upon his REFRAD shows he completed 4 months and 28 days of creditable active duty service. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016923

    Original file (20130016923.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States), dated 24 August 2011 * Guard Annex (Enlistment Agreement Army National Guard (ARNG) Service Requirements and Methods of Fulfillment), dated 29 August 2011 * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 600-7-1-R-E (Annex E to DD Form 4 NPS Critical Paragraph/Line Number [Military Occupational Specialty] MOS Enlistment Bonus Decentralized State Incentive Pilot Program (DSIPP) Addendum ARNG of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040006696C070208

    Original file (040006696C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Kenneth Wright | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The fact that the applicant had a dental appointment scheduled after his discharge does not mean that all appropriate dental services and treatment had not been completed prior to his separation. Item 17 on his DD Form 214, however, shows that all appropriate dental services and treatment had been completed.