Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011298
Original file (20100011298.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  28 October 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100011298 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that the first name recorded in his military records be corrected.  He also requests correction of the service number (SN) that is shown on his discharge documents.

2.  The applicant states his birth certificate shows his first name as "Fernando"; however, his military records incorrectly show his first name as "Ferdinand."  He also states that his SN was "-- 032 ---"; however, the SN shown on his discharge documents is "-- 034 ---."

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States), National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service in the Army National Guard of the United States [ARNGUS] and the Army National Guard of Wyoming [WYARNG]), Honorable Discharge Certificate, Certificate of Eligibility, Delayed Certificate of Birth, Certificate of Baptism, Social Security Card, and Motor Vehicle Record.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, the applicant's separation documents (i.e., DD Form 214 and NGB Form 22) provide sufficient documentary evidence for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The State Adjutant General is responsible for the preparation of the NGB Form 22 upon separation of personnel from the Army National Guard of that State.  Thus, the ABCMR has no jurisdiction to grant the requested relief pertaining to the applicant's NGB Form 22 and Honorable Discharge Certificate.  However, this in no way affects his right to submit a request to the Wyoming State Adjutant General to pursue correction of his WYARNG records.  This issue will not be discussed further in this Record of Proceedings.

4.  The applicant enlisted in the ARNGUS and WYARNG for a period of 3 years on 15 September 1949.  His date of birth is -- September 193-.

5.  In support of his application, the applicant provides copies of the following documents.

   a.  A DD Form 214 that shows he entered active duty on 11 September 1950, he was honorably released from active duty on 16 August 1952, and transferred to the ARNGUS, 5th Army Area.  At the time he had completed 1 year, 
11 months, and 6 days of net service this period; 11 months and 26 days of other service; and 2 years, 11 months, and 2 days of total net service for pay.

       (1)  Item 1 (Last Name - First Name - Middle Name) shows the entry "T-----FERDINAND."

       (2)  Item 2 (Service Number) shows the entry "NG-- 032 ---."

       (3)  Item 48 (Signature) shows he signed the document "Ferdinand T------."

   b.  An NGB Form 22 that shows he enlisted in the ARNGUS and WYARNG for a period of 3 years on 15 September 1949 and he was honorably discharged on 14 September 1952.  At the time he had completed 3 years of total service for pay purposes.

       (1)  Item 1 (Name - Last, first, middle initial) shows the entry "T----- Ferdinand (NMI) [No Middle Initial]."

       (2)  Item 2 (Service Number) shows the entry "--034---."
   
       (3)  Item 48 (Signature) shows he signed the document "Ferdinand T------."

   c.  An Honorable Discharge Certificate that shows he was honorably discharged from the ARNGUS and WYARNG on 14 September 1952.  The certificate shows the name "T-----, FERDINAND (NMI)" and SN "--034---."

   d.  A Veterans Administration, Certificate of Eligibility for Loan Guaranty Benefits, dated 29 April 1988, that shows the name "Ferdinand T-----" and
SN "-- 032 ---."

   e.  State of New Mexico, Delayed Certificate of Birth, issued on 13 October 1970, that shows the full name of the child as "FERNANDO A---- T-----" and that he was born on -- September 193-.  The Delayed Certificate of Birth was issued based on evidence that consisted of an Affidavit [sworn by the applicant's mother on 5 October 1970], a Certificate of Baptism (to verify facts), and the applicant's DD Form 214 (to verify his date and place of birth).

   f.  A Certificate of Baptism that shows "Fernando A---- T-----" was born on
-- September 193- and Baptized according to the Rite of the Roman Catholic Church on -- September 193-.  It also shows the certificate was issued on
13 October 1944.

   g.  A Social Security Card that shows the name "FERNANDO A----- T-----."

   h.  A State of Colorado, Motor Vehicle Record, dated 25 January 2010, that shows the name "FERNANDO A----- T-----."

6.  Service Regulations Number 615-360-1 (Discharge Procedures and Preparation of Separation Forms), in effect at the time of the applicant's separation from active duty, prescribed the discharge procedures and separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It also established standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.

   a.  The instructions for item 1 state enter the last name, first name, and full middle name or names, if any.  If the separatee has only a middle initial, the initial will be entered.
   b.  The instructions for item 2 state enter enlisted person's service number together with the authorized prefix (e.g., NG for National Guard).

7.  National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management) prescribes policies and procedures regarding National Guard Bureau separation documents.  It also establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the NGB Form 22.  It provides that the State Adjutant General is responsible for the preparation of the NGB Form 22 upon separation of personnel from the Army National Guard of that State.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his military service records should be corrected to show his first name is Fernando.  He also contends that the SN on his discharge documents should be corrected.

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant served in the ARNGUS and WYARNG, and on active duty in the Army, under the name "FERDINAND T-----" and his SN was "-- 032 ---."

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214 issued at the time of his separation from active duty on 16 August 1952 correctly shows the applicant's SN and the name under which he served on active duty in the Army.  In addition, the applicant signed the document with a signature matching that of the name typed in item
1 of the DD Form 214.

4.  The evidence of record shows that, subsequent to the period of military service under review, a Delayed Certificate of Birth was issued showing the applicant's name is "FERNANDO A----- T-----."  In addition, it is noted that the applicant's DD Form 214, showing the name "Ferdinand T-----," was used to verify his date and place of birth.

5.  Considering all the evidence and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law, and regulations, it is concluded that the documents provided by the applicant are insufficient to warrant a change to the name recorded in his military service records and on his DD Form 214.  Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to correction of his
DD Form 214 in this case.

6.  For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records.  Accordingly, the information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  In this regard, the evidence of record shows that the applicant's military service records reflect the correct name (at the time) under which military service was performed.  Therefore, in the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, the applicant's military service records should not be changed.  However, as a matter of record, a copy of this Record of Proceedings will be filed in the applicant's military records showing his name was changed based on a State of New Mexico, Delayed Certificate of Birth, issued subsequent to his separation from the U.S. Army.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _ X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100011298



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100011298



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006145

    Original file (20130006145.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his middle name as Kirkland instead of Keith and his birth year as 1933 instead of 1932. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. This should serve to clarify any questions or confusion regarding the difference in the year...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008608

    Original file (20120008608.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his middle name as Fernando instead of Fernandez. The applicant states his middle name is Fernando, not Fernandez. Item 1 (Name (Last, First, Middle)) of his DD Form 214 shows his middle name as Fernandez.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009094

    Original file (20140009094.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show entitlement to the $20,000.00 Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive that he contracted for upon enlistment in the Army National Guard (ARNG). Records show the applicant enlisted in the WYARNG on 15 April 2009 for a period of 6 years in MOS 68W and his enlistment agreement included the SLRP. The Deputy G1 stated that although MOS 68W could not be validated as an authorized critical skill, a review of the applicant's DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021544

    Original file (20130021544.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Also on 3 August 2011, the applicant executed an oath office, at Ann Arbor, MI, recording the date of acceptance of appointment as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army on that date. a. Paragraph 2-2 states that the effective date of Federal recognition for original appointment is the date on which the commissioned officer executes the oath of office in the State. However, the evidence of record shows the applicant executed an NGB Form 337 for appointment in the State on 21 September...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012594

    Original file (20140012594 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his date of rank (DOR) for chief warrant officer two (CW2)/pay grade W-2. The applicant states he was appointed as a warrant officer one (WO1)/pay grade W-1 on 7 April 2009. The evidence of record shows the applicant executed an oath of office in the rank of CW2 on 7 April 2011 and MDARNG orders, dated 19 April 2011, announced his promotion to CW2 effective and with a DOR of 7 April 2011.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017397

    Original file (20110017397.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his military records by changing his middle name from John to Patrick. This regulation has historically stated that item 1 of the DD Form 214 will contain the name taken from the Soldier's personnel record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015012

    Original file (20130015012.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). A DD Form 214 and DD Form 215 (Correction to DD From 214) are the only documents remaining in the reconstructed record for review in this case. Filing the Board's decisional document in his record will also guarantee the historical integrity of the applicant's military record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022437

    Original file (20100022437.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Orders 330-1325 (State promotion to CPT) * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Special Orders 306 AR (initial appointment), 43 AR (promotion to 1LT), and 193 AR (promotion to CPT) * U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) promotion to CPT and 1LT memoranda * Orders 174-1003 (promotion to 1LT) * Orders 197-1110 (State appointment orders) * Mobilization and demobilization orders * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * Email exchange with Officer Personnel...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011672

    Original file (20110011672.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provides: * ARNG SRIP Policy Number 07-06 memorandum, dated 10 August 2007 * Appointment orders, dated 4 June 2008 * Oath of Office, dated 6 June 2008 * DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 3 March 2010 * Two Requests for Exception to Policy for Payment of OAB memoranda, dated 31 March and 21 April 2010 * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Request for Exception to Policy for OAB memorandum, dated 21 May 2010 * WYARNG The Adjutant General (TAG) Exception to Policy...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005862C070206

    Original file (20050005862C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his first and middle name as R_ _ _n A_ _ _ _ _o as shown on his birth certificate. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.