Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018730
Original file (20140018730.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  25 November 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140018730 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012, and whose MH diagnosis was changed during that process.

3.  The applicant submitted an application through the Department of Defense (DOD) Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system.

2.  The DOD memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of MH diagnoses for service members completing a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012, to determine if service members were disadvantaged by a changed diagnosis over the course of their physical disability process.

3.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the PDBR SRP and the applicant was provided a copy.

4.  The applicant did not respond to the advisory opinion.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change to the applicant's disability and retirement determination.

2.  The SRP considers the appropriateness of changes in the applicant's MH diagnoses and the appropriateness of Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) fitness determination for any MH condition.  If the SRP, based on a preponderance of performance-based evidence, judges that an MH condition was unfairly characterized as not unfitting by the Service, it further considers whether the provisions of Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) section 4.129 were applicable and makes recommendations for said ratings in accordance with VASRD section 4.130.

3.  The SRP noted that the DD Form 2808 (Report of Medical Examination) did not note any diagnosis of a MH condition.  The psych narrative summary listed a diagnosis of major depression (MD), recurrent, existed prior to service, service aggravated.  The Medical Evaluation Board forwarded MD as medically unacceptable and the PEB adjudicated the MD condition as noted above.  Therefore, the applicant did not meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Project.

4.  The SRP noted that the VA Compensation and Pension examination 3 months prior to separation diagnosed Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) related to combat events and indicated that the diagnosis met all the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria.  The SRP considered that the preponderance of evidence in the service treatment record did not support a diagnosis of PTSD.  Therefore, the SRP agreed there is insufficient evidence to recommend a change of the Service conferred MH diagnosis.

5.  The SRP next addressed the application of VASRD section 4.129 in its recommendations, noting that VASRD section 4.129 does not specify a diagnosis of PTSD; rather, it states “mental disorder due to a highly stressful event.”  The SRP majority agreed that there was not sufficient evidence to support a conclusion that a highly-stressful event severe enough to bring about the applicant’s release from active military service occurred and that the application of VASRD section 4.129 is not appropriate in this case.

6.  The SRP next deliberated the rating of the MH condition at separation.  The SRP consensus was that the evidence at separation most closely met the 50 percent rating in accordance with VASRD section 4.130, specified as “occupational and social impairment with reduced reliability and productivity.”

7.  After due deliberation in consideration of the evidence, the SRP concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB’s disability and retirement determination. 

8.  The available evidence shows the SRP's assessment should be accepted.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  __X______  _X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20040003532



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                  AR20140018730



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010890

    Original file (20140010890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the MH diagnoses, Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) fitness determination, whether the provisions of Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) section 4.129 were applicable, and whether a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002392

    Original file (20140002392.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the mental health (MH) diagnoses, the physical evaluation board (PEB) fitness determination and, if unfitting, whether the provisions of the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009137

    Original file (20140009137.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SRP recommends no change in the applicant’s unfitting condition diagnosis, and that the applicant’s prior separation be modified to reflect that the applicant was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) at 50 percent for a period of 6 months in accordance with (IAW) the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) section 4.129 and then permanently separated by reason of physical disability with a final 80 percent rating. The SRP considered the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001339

    Original file (20140001339.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the MH diagnoses, whether the provisions of the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) Section 4.129 were applicable, and a disability rating recommendation in accordance with VASRD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150006052

    Original file (20150006052.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the Disability Evaluation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150014152

    Original file (20150014152.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the disability evaluation system (DES). The higher 70 percent rating is for “Occupational and social impairment, with deficiencies in most areas.”...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150015662

    Original file (20150015662.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the Disability Evaluation System (DES). The SRP considered whether the provisions of VASRD section 4.129 were applicable for the unfitting MH condition.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007675

    Original file (20140007675.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the MH diagnoses; the physical evaluation board (PEB) fitness determination; if unfitting, whether the provisions of VASRD, section 4.129, were applicable; and a disability rating recommendation in accordance with VASRD, section 4.130. The SRP noted that while the PEB had placed the applicant on the TDRL, application of VASRD, section 4.129, required a minimum disability rating of 50 percent with re-evaluation. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001273

    Original file (20140001273.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health condition. The SRP adjudged that there was not a preponderance of the evidence to support a change of diagnosis to PTSD at TDRL entry. As a result, the Board recommends denial of the application that pertains to any change in the applicant's MH diagnoses and change in the applicant's MH permanent disability rating.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021916

    Original file (20130021916.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. After a comprehensive review of the applicant’s case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that the applicant's unfitting mental health (MH) condition diagnosis be changed to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), coded 9411. The SRP determined that the...