Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150014152
Original file (20150014152.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  29 September 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150014152 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012, and whose MH diagnosis was changed during that process.

3.  The applicant submitted an application through the Department of Defense (DOD) Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system.

2.  The DOD memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of MH diagnoses for service members completing a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012, to determine if service members were disadvantaged by a changed diagnosis over the course of their physical disability process.

3.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the PDBR SRP and the applicant was provided a copy.

4.  The applicant did not respond to the advisory opinion.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that the applicant’s prior determination be modified to reflect bipolar disorder.

2.  The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the disability evaluation system (DES).  Diagnoses of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and bipolar disorder (by the MEB) were rendered during the DES process.  The diagnosis of PTSD was not forwarded by the MEB; however, this was not to the applicant’s disadvantage because the PTSD symptomatology was subsumed into the bipolar diagnosis and rated in accordance with the unified Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). 

3.  In accordance with VASRD principles, MH diagnoses are rated together as one condition under the primary diagnosis due to overlapping symptoms and impairments.  The SRP agreed there were no inappropriate changes in diagnosis and therefore determined that MH diagnoses were not changed to the applicant’s possible disadvantage in the disability evaluation.  Therefore, the applicant did not meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Diagnosis Review Project. 

4.  The SRP considered impairments attributed to the applicant’s PTSD in its overall VASRD section 4.130 rating recommendation for bipolar disorder.  The SRP next considered whether the provisions of VASRD section 4.129 were applicable for the unfitting MH condition.  Regardless of final Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) diagnosis, VASRD section 4.129 does not specify a diagnosis of PTSD, rather it states “mental disorder due to a highly stressful event,” and its application is not restricted to PTSD. 

5.  The SRP noted while the primary diagnosis was bipolar disorder, the evidence is clear that this condition had its onset after exposure to a series of traumatic events while in a combat zone.  The SRP is obligated to recommend a minimum 50 percent for a mental disorder as a result of a highly stressful event for those MH cases in which the condition is secondary to a traumatic event.  The SRP members agreed that the VASRD section 4.130 criteria for a Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) rating higher than 50 percent at the time of placement on TDRL were not met.

6.  After due deliberation and consideration of all of the evidence, and mindful of the VASRD section 4.3, the SRP unanimously recommends a rating of 50 percent for the bipolar condition at TDRL placement.  The SRP then considered the rating at TDRL removal.  The SRP considered if there was evidence of a VASRD section 4.130 rating higher than 50 percent at time of TDRL removal.

7.  The higher 70 percent rating is for “Occupational and social impairment, with deficiencies in most areas.”  The SRP considered the record in evidence and determined that the evidence best supported the 70 percent disability rating.  The SRP also noted that because total psychiatric impairment (regardless of co-existing MH diagnoses) is subsumed under a single rating, the presence of multiple MH diagnoses is irrelevant to rating.  

8.  The available evidence shows the SRP's assessment should be accepted.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___x____  ___x____  ____x___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION
















BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by modifying the applicant’s record to show her prior separation as follows, effective as of the date of her medical separation.

UNFITTING CONDITION
VASRD CODE
 TDRL RATINGgG
PERMANENT RATING
Bipolar Disorder
9432
50 percent
      70 percent

COMBINED
50 percent
70 percent
2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented was insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends no change to the applicant’s unfitting condition diagnosis.




      __________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20040003532



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                  AR20150014152



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010716

    Original file (20140010716.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System. The SRP next reviewed the rating recommendation at the time the applicant was removed from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150006052

    Original file (20150006052.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the Disability Evaluation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005651

    Original file (20150005651.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the Disability Evaluation System (DES). The SRP considered if there was evidence for a VASRD Section 4.130 rating higher than 30 percent at the time of TDRL entry. After due deliberation considering all of the evidence, and mindful of VASRD Section 4.3 (reasonable doubt), the SRP recommended a rating of 50 percent at the time of entry on TDRL and no...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009137

    Original file (20140009137.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SRP recommends no change in the applicant’s unfitting condition diagnosis, and that the applicant’s prior separation be modified to reflect that the applicant was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) at 50 percent for a period of 6 months in accordance with (IAW) the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) section 4.129 and then permanently separated by reason of physical disability with a final 80 percent rating. The SRP considered the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013449

    Original file (20140013449.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. After a comprehensive review of the applicant’s case, the SRP recommend by unanimous vote that the applicant's prior MH rating determinations be modified to reflect a Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) entry at 50 percent for his MH condition, for a combined TDRL entry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150012799

    Original file (20150012799.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the military Disability Evaluation System (DES). Because the Service conducted an independent management review with special attention to PTSD and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010917

    Original file (20140010917.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP also considered if there was evidence for a VASRD Section 4.130 rating higher than 50 percent at time of placement on the TDRL. The SRP concluded that the 70 percent criteria was not reflected in the evidence and therefore agreed that a rating higher than 50 percent...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150006049

    Original file (20150006049.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The SRP concluded, based on the evidence, the diagnosis of PTSD was the likely diagnosis, the Physical Evaluation Board determined the condition was unfitting, and application of the provisions of Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) section 4.129 was correct (Mental disorders due to traumatic stress) at Temporary Disability Retired List...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005870

    Original file (20150005870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the Disability Evaluation System (DES). After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP agreed the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008198

    Original file (20140008198.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. Its first assessment with regard to the MH condition, under SRP guidelines, was to judge (based on a preponderance of evidence) whether an MH diagnosis was changed or unfairly eliminated during the Disability Evaluation System (DES) proceedings. Furthermore, the conclusion that there was a separately unfitting TBI at permanent retirement was challenged by the observations...