Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018532
Original file (20140018532.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	 

		BOARD DATE:	  4 June 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140018532


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the correct last duty assignment.  

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he was never assigned to the unit that is listed on his DD Form 214.  He would like his DD Form 214 changed to show he was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC), 1st Battalion, 30th Infantry Regiment.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 and five pages of educational forms.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  After having had prior service, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 
3 November 1976.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 91B (Medical Specialist). 

3.  His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II) shows in:

* Item 5 (Oversea Service), he served in Germany from 17 January 1979 thru 27 November 1980
* Item 35 (Record of Assignments), he was assigned to HHC, 1st Battalion, 30th Infantry Regiment, 3d Infantry Division, in the Republic of Germany, from 23 January 1979 to 27 November 1980

4.  Orders 164-125, issued by the U.S. Army Regional Personnel Center, Schweinfurt, Germany on 12 June 1980, reassigned him to the U.S. Army Separation Transfer Point, Fort Jackson, SC for separation processing.  These orders show his unit of assignment as HHC, 1st Battalion, 30th Infantry Regiment, APO, NY.  

5.  He was honorably discharged from the Army on 30 October 1980.  His        DD Form 214 shows he was credited with 3 years, 11 months, and 28 days of net active service, including 1 year, 9 months, and 12 days of foreign service.  The highest rank/grade he attained while serving on active duty was specialist/ E-4.  Item 7 shows he was assigned to "HHC 1st BN 39th Infantry E7 USAREUR."

6.  The applicant provided five pages of educational forms that list his unit of assignment as HHC, 1st Battalion, 30th Infantry Regiment.   

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribed the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It established standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It stated the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active service.  Its purpose is to provide a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.  The 
version of the regulation in effect at the time of his discharge stated to enter the last unit of assignment, major command, and the corresponding two character assignment code shown in paragraph 2-4, Army Regulation 680-29 (Military Personnel, Organization, and Type of Transaction Code) in item 7.   




DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show his correct last duty assignment was carefully considered and was determined to have merit.  

2.  The preponderance of the evidence shows at the time of his discharge he was assigned to HHC, 1st Battalion, 30th Infantry Regiment, which was located in Europe.  There is no evidence in his records that suggests he was ever assigned to HHC, 1st Battalion, 39th Infantry Regiment, as indicated on his DD Form 214; therefore, it would be appropriate to amend item 7 of his DD Form 214 to show his correct last unit of assignment.        

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 7 of his DD Form 214 by:

* deleting the entry "HHC 1ST BN 39TH INFANTRY E7 USAREUR"
* adding the entry "HHC 1ST BN 30TH INFANTRY E7 USAREUR"



      _______________X___________
       	       CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100014579



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140018532



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006109

    Original file (20110006109.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he is not entitled to have his record corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting C Battery, 6th Battalion, 14th Field Artillery Regiment, USAREUR E7 from item 7 of his DD Form 214; b. adding Headquarters and Headquarters Battery, 6th Battalion, 14th Field Artillery Regiment, 1st Armored Division, USAREUR E7 to item 9 of his DD Form 214; c. awarding him the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004549

    Original file (20110004549.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show he served 28 months overseas and was a member of the 1st Battalion (Airborne) 509th Infantry Battalion Combat Team. Evidence of record further shows his last unit assignment was HHC, 1st Battalion, 509th Infantry Regiment (ABCT) USAREUR which is correctly annotated on his DD Form 214, as he requests.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018485

    Original file (20100018485.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) governed award of the CIB to Army forces operating in South Vietnam. The letter he provided from his company commander is considered to be an official document of record; however, it refers to the unit engaging in ground combat after the applicant's departure from the unit. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence for award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009761

    Original file (20100009761.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests amendment of an entry on a Standard Form (SF) 502 (Clinical Record - Narrative Summary), dated 6 June 1973. The applicant states: * the entry "in the field" on the SF 502 is wrong and should not be there * the correct entry should be "injured during combat training" * his last duty assignment and major command is wrong on his DD Form 214 and should read HQ CO [Headquarters Company], 1st BN [Battalion], 16th Inf [Infantry], APO NY [Army Post Office New York] 09046 3. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018802

    Original file (20140018802.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 12 of his DD Form 214 shows his last duty assignment as "APO [Army Post Office] 09696 HH SVC BTRY [Headquarters and Headquarters Service Battery] 5TH BN [5th Battalion] 94th ARTY [94th Artillery] USAREUR [U.S. Army Europe]." The entry on the applicant's DA Form 20 showing his last duty assignment and major command as HHSB, 1st Battalion, 94th Artillery, USAREUR, is accepted as sufficient evidence on which to amend item 12 of his DD Form 214. _______ _ X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002890

    Original file (20150002890 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show a 15-month period of service in Panama (August 1973 - November 1974) and again in October 1989. His DA Form 20 covering the period 16 November 1971 through 18 November 1974 shows – * foreign service in Panama from 30 September 1973 through an unreadable date (possibly 17 November 1974) * the record of assignments section shows a 30 September 1973 assignment to Company A, 4th Battalion, 20th Infantry in Panama with the next entry being...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023038

    Original file (20100023038.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the correct period of foreign service and award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. The applicant provides his DD Form 214. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011286

    Original file (20140011286.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    From 1951 to 1962, item 24 of the DD Form 214 in effect at the time showed the total active duty outside the continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214. b. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states that the Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015033

    Original file (20100015033.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show: * Assignment to B Company, 6th Battalion, 502nd Infantry, Berlin Brigade, from 2 March 1991 to 31 August 1991 * Deployment to Silopi, Turkey, in support of Operation Provide Comfort from July 1991 to August 1991 * All awards and decorations associated with his deployment. His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) does not show his assignment to the 6th Battalion nor does it show any activities after his arrival in Berlin in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000646

    Original file (20140000646.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    An endorsement to a DA Form 2496 (Disposition Form) from the Commander, Company A, 4th Battalion (Mechanized), 3d Infantry Regiment, Americal Division, dated 6 June 1970, subject: Request for Early Separation to Attend School (Applicant), states the applicant was not under charges, investigation, flagging action, or other administrative action and he rated the applicant's conduct and efficiency as "excellent." The applicant's records clearly show he was assigned to 4th Battalion...