Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009761
Original file (20100009761.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE:	  21 September 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100009761 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests amendment of an entry on a Standard Form (SF) 502 (Clinical Record - Narrative Summary), dated 6 June 1973.  He also requests correction of item 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge).
 
2.  The applicant states:

* the entry "in the field" on the SF 502 is wrong and should not be there
* the correct entry should be "injured during combat training"
* his last duty assignment and major command is wrong on his DD Form 214 and should read HQ CO [Headquarters Company], 1st BN [Battalion], 16th Inf [Infantry], APO NY [Army Post Office New York] 09046
 
3.  The applicant provides a copy of:

* his DD Form 214
* page 1 of his SF 502, dated 6 June 1973
* page 3 of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record)
* Disapproval Reconsideration Letter from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, Combat-Related Special Compensation Division, Alexandria, VA, dated 14 July 2008


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 March 1971 for a period of 
2 years.  He was awarded military occupational specialty 94B (cook).  His DA Form 20 shows he arrived in Germany on 8 October 1971 and he was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC), 1st Battalion, 16th Infantry.

3.  The applicant provided an SF 502, dated 6 June 1973, which states, in pertinent part, "The patient injured his right wrist in September of 1972.  He states that he was "in the field" at the time, and fell, catching himself with his wrist, and was felt to have a slight radial-ulnar dislocation and a laceration of the right medial wrist."

4.  On 16 October 1973, the applicant was released from active duty and placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) the following day.  On 31 August 1975, the applicant was removed from the TDRL and permanently retired with a 30 percent (%) disability rating percentage.

5.  Item 12 of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the entry "HQ CO 1st BN 26th Inf APO NY 09046."  

6.  There is no contemporaneous medical evidence of record which shows the applicant was injured during combat training in the field.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although the applicant contends the entry on the 6 June 1973 SF 502 is incorrect in that he was injured during combat training, there is no evidence, and the applicant did not provide any evidence, which conclusively refutes the entry 


in question on the SF 502.  In the absence of compelling evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the medical authorities at the time in question were correct.  Therefore, there is no basis to amend the 6 June 1973 SF 502.

2.  Item 12 of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows his last duty assignment was Headquarters Company, 1st Battalion, 26th Infantry.  However, evidence of record shows his last duty assignment was HHC, 1st Battalion, 16th Infantry in Germany.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct item 12 on his DD Form 214 accordingly.

3.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations - Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states that for item 12, enter the individual's current unit of assignment and the title of the major command or agency having jurisdiction over the organization.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

__x_____  ___x____  ____x___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting from item 12 of his DD Form 214 the entry "HQ CO 1st BN 26th INF APO NY 09046" and replacing it with the entry "HHC 1ST BN 16TH INF APO NY 09046."

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends 


denial of so much of the application that pertains to amending the 6 June 1973 Standard Form 502.



      _________x______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100009761



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                       

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110007914

    Original file (20110007914.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This pamphlet shows that at the time of the applicant's assignment to the 2nd Battalion (Airborne), 327th Infantry, it was cited for award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation during the period 29 July 1965 through 1 October 1966 based on Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) 17, dated 1968. Evidence of record shows the applicant was assigned to HHC, 2nd Battalion (Airborne), 327th Infantry, 101st Airborne Division, APO 96347 USARV. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018532

    Original file (20140018532.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the correct last duty assignment. Its purpose is to provide a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. There is no evidence in his records that suggests he was ever assigned to HHC, 1st Battalion, 39th Infantry Regiment, as indicated on his DD Form 214; therefore, it would be appropriate to amend item 7...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011575C070208

    Original file (20040011575C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant also claims his unit was awarded the RVNGC with Palm Unit Citation, and that he is entitled to the AGCM. However, there are no orders, flight records, or other evidence on file in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) that confirms he is entitled to this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him Army Good Conduct Medal; by showing his entitlement to the Air Medal with Numeral...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002941

    Original file (20080002941.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his social security number (SSN) and last duty assignment on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 2 June 1968. A few documents from his U. S. Army Reserve service show the applicant’s SSN as 473-__-____. The applicant’s DD Form 214 for the period ending 2 June 1968 should be amended to show his SSN as 437-__-____ and his last duty assignment as being with the 173d Airborne...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006359

    Original file (20110006359.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show in: * item 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) HQ BTRY, 15 AAA, AW, BN, SP 7th INF DIV * item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), and Korean Service Medal (KSM) * item 18 (intended to mean item 28 ((Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024384

    Original file (20100024384.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart with Oak Leaf Cluster, Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation (2nd Award), RVN Civil Actions Honor First Class Unit Citation, Meritorious Unit Commendation, and RVN Gallantry Cross with Silver Star. The applicant provides his DD Form 214, effective 5 June 1970; DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 2...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012551

    Original file (20100012551.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) as then in effect, provided that Item 12 of the DD Form 214 would show for personnel reassigned on orders to a transfer activity or to a medical holding detachment prior to separation, the losing unit of assignment as shown in the standard name line and the title of the major command or agency having jurisdiction over the losing unit of assignment. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his correct unit of assignment. _______ _...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028781

    Original file (20100028781.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states his assignment to G Company, 75th Infantry (Ranger), Americal Division from July 1969 through September 1969 was omitted from his DD Form 214. It further shows in item 30 of his DD Form 214 his entire continuous period of service in the RVN from 18 July 1969 through 14 September 1969. Evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded an infantry MOS and that he served in an infantryman unit before being evacuated from Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023770

    Original file (20110023770.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his DD Form 214 does not include his Vietnam service or service dates, the company he was assigned to in Vietnam, his medical information, or all the awards and decorations he received. The applicant's record shows his service in Vietnam met the time requirements for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004402C070206

    Original file (20050004402C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service record shows that he enlisted in the U.S. Army on 27 January 1965. However, the applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) was reviewed and found to contain documentation relating to the applicant's U.S. Army enlistment and separation medical examinations, which are, in pertinent part, discussed below. The evidence of record shows that there is only one (dated) entry on each SF 600 by the doctor in question (i.e., on 24 March 1965 and 17 June 1965).