Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018252
Original file (20140018252.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	
		BOARD DATE:	  16 June 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140018252 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests her last name be changed from V____- H___ to V____ on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 31 October 2001 and on Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) related documents.

2.  The applicant states she was divorced on 16 August 2006.

3.  The applicant provides her Judgment and Decree of Absolute Divorce from the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County, MD, dated 15 August 2006.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  According to the "eBenefits" website, in order to update an individual's name in DEERS they must call the Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) Support Office at 800 538-9552, Monday through Friday, 5:00 am to 5:00 pm, Pacific Time for information concerning the required documents needed to process the name change.  Mail the relevant name change document to the DMDC, including social security number, current phone number, and address to the DMDC Support Office, 400 Gigling Road, Seaside, CA 93955-6771.  This information may also be faxed to the DMDC at 831 655-8317.  There is no determination required by ABCMR; therefore, this issue will not be discussed further in these Proceedings.

3.  On 5 September 1980, she enlisted in the Regular Army and continued to serve in an enlisted status.

4.  On 28 February 1989, she requested her military records be changed to show her last name as V____.  Her request was verified and approved.

5.  U.S. Army Intelligence Center and Fort Huachuca, Fort Huachuca, AZ Orders 70-19, dated 10 April 1991, discharged her from her enlisted status and ordered her to active duty in the grade of WO1.  Her last name on these orders is shown as V____.  

6.  On 15 May 1991, she was appointed a WO1 in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and entered extended active duty.  Her DA Form 71 (Oath of Office - Military Personnel) shows her last name as V____.

7.  On 19 August 1993, she was promoted to chief warrant officer two (CW2).  Her DA Form 71 shows her last name as V____.

8.  All of the Officer Evaluation Reports (OER) that she received since being appointed a WO1 show her last name as V____.

9.  Her DD Form 214 shows her last name as V____h___.  Retirement Orders 022-0003, dated 22 January 2001, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort George G. Meade, MD, show her last as V____.  Both documents show that she was retired from active duty effective 31 October 2001.

10.  A certificate awarding her the Meritorious Service Medal, dated 6 November 2001, shows her last name as V____.



11.  Her Officer Record Brief (ORB), with a brief date of 10 November 2001, shows her last name as V____ H___.

12.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) at the time established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The regulation directs that the purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of his or her military service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  It is important that information entered on the form be complete and accurate and reflects the conditions as they existed at the time of separation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant's DA Forms 71, orders for active duty, all of her OERs, and her retirement orders show her last name as V____.  Only her DD Form 214 and ORB show a last name other than V____.  The preponderance of evidence shows that since her appointment to WO1 she served using the last name of V____.  Therefore, her last name on her DD Form 214 with a separation date of 31 October 2001 should be changed to V____.

BOARD VOTE:

__x______  ___x_____  ___x__  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending her DD Form 214 with a separation date of 31 October 2001 to show 






her name as shown on Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort George G. Meade Orders 022-0003, dated 22 January 2001.



      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140018252



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140018252



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020403

    Original file (20130020403.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    With prior enlisted service in the Regular Army (RA), the applicant accepted an appointment as a Reserve warrant officer one (WO1) on 24 October 2001 and entered on active duty. Item 12a on his DD Form 214 shows he entered active this period on 11 November 2005 and Item 12c shows he completed 3 years, 7 months, and 20 days of net active service this period. This service should be corrected on his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017337

    Original file (20140017337.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    These orders cite Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions), paragraph 1-20, as the authority for this promotion. His DD Form 214 shows in: * item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank), "CPL" * item 4b (Pay Grade), "E04" * item 12i (Effective Date of Pay Grade), "2006 09 01" * item 18 (Remarks), "Retired List Grade SGT" 6. The evidence of record shows the applicant was retired by reason of permanent disability on 31 August 2014.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008282

    Original file (20120008282.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service; and d. for those individuals who have an approved retirement date after 1 August 2009 and before 1 July 2010, no additional service is required. There is insufficient evidence that shows the applicant submitted a request to transfer educational benefits to her family members while in an active status. The applicant contends that she is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011601

    Original file (20140011601.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her record to show she submitted a timely application to transfer her Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to her son. The evidence of record does not support correction of the applicant's record to show she submitted a timely application to transfer her Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to her son. She was not eligible to transfer education benefits during this period.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002910

    Original file (20070002910.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    United States Army Human Resources Command (St. Louis) memorandum, dated 22 November 2006, informed the applicant that by the direction of the President, she was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army, effective on her acceptance. A DA Form 1506 authenticated by the Chief of the Essential Service Branch of United States Army Human Resources Command (St. Louis) shows the applicant's active duty service in the United States Army Reserve Active Guard/Reserve from 2 July 2005...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008006

    Original file (20100008006.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) the duplicate set of orders awarding her the third award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL). There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's OMPF to show that either of the orders awarding her the GCMDL (3rd Award) were revoked. Therefore, it would be appropriate to revoke the second (duplicate) order that was issued awarding the applicant the GCMDL (3rd Award) for the same period of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004105189C070208

    Original file (2004105189C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Robert J. Osborn | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The March 2004 letter noted that Captain P___ had a Doctorate in Psychology and that her progress notes indicated the applicant had been diagnosed with personality disorder not otherwise specified with histrionic and obsessive-compulsive traits. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140005417

    Original file (AR20140005417.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * NGB Form 62E (Application for Federal Recognition as an Army National Guard (ARNG) Officer or Warrant Officer and Appointment as a Reserve Commissioned Officer or Warrant Officer of the Army in the ARNG of the United States), dated 1 November 2010 * NGB Form 89, dated 20 January 2011 * NGB PPOM 11-045, dated 26 July 2011, subject: Guidance Concerning Applications for Federal Recognition of Warrant Officers * DA Form 71 (Oath of Office – Military Personnel), dated 24...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003510

    Original file (20140003510.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * applications for compassionate reassignment and hardship discharge * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * four character-reference letters * military records from the National Personnel Records Center CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The Soldier must request separation because of dependency or hardship in writing. She submitted a request for a hardship discharge and her request was approved.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004446

    Original file (20140004446.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of her record to show her last name as Bi_____ instead of Ro---. ____________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.