Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017711
Original file (20140017711.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  4 June 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140017711 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, the spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, Title 10 orders placing the FSM in an active duty status for the period 11 November 2010 to 23 January 2012, and all back pay and allowances due, plus the benefits the FSM would have been entitled to receive at the time of death.  

2.  The applicant states her spouse was mobilized with the Arizona Army National Guard (AZARNG) on Title 10 orders on 23 September 2009.  While on these orders, the FSM was diagnosed with cancer on 25 July 2010.  The AZARNG erroneously placed the FSM on incapacitation orders before his death thereby precluding many benefits his family normally would have received in an active duty, line of duty death.

3.  The applicant provides numerous pages of personal, administrative, and medical documentation in support of her claim. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Orders 224-176, issued by Joint Force Headquarters - Arizona, dated
12 August 2009, mobilized the FSM in the rank/grade of sergeant first class/E-7 under Title 10 U.S. Code, effective 23 September 2009.

2.  The available evidence shows the FSM served in Iraq for the period 
19 November 2009 to 12 September 2010, in military occupational specialty 31B (Military Police).
3.  The applicant provides:

   a.  DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status), dated 13 December 2010, which noted the FSM had a history of myeloma; but he was in remission before deployment.  He began noticing increased weight loss and intense abdominal pain.  After returning from deployment and still on Title 10 orders, he attempted to receive treatment for smaller injuries when he was diagnosed with cancer.

   b.  A memorandum from the National Guard Bureau (NGB), dated                15 February 2011, approving a line of duty investigation pertaining to the FSM.  It notes the FSM's multiple myeloma and nasal plasmacytoma recurrence which occurred during Operation Iraqi Freedom was approved as "IN LINE OF DUTY-EPTS-SERVICE AGGRAVATION."
   
   c.  Certificate of Death, State of Arizona, which shows the FSM date of death as 23 January 2012.
   
   d.  A memorandum from the NGB, dated 21 February 2012, referencing an approval of a request for an extension of incapacitation pay beyond 6 months for the period 1 January to 23 January 2012.

4.  During the processing of this case, on 14 January 2015, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Personnel Policy Branch, NGB.  The advisory official recommended approval of the applicant's request and stated:

   a.  The FSM was mobilized to Iraq on Title 10 Order Number 224-176 and while still on these active duty orders he was diagnosed with cancer.  The FSM was released from active duty (REFRAD) and placed on non-duty incapacitation pay status.

   b.  On 12 August 2009, the FSM received Title 10 mobilization Order Number 224-176 with an effective date of 23 September 2009 for up to 400 days of active duty service.

   c.  On 16 September 2010, the FSM received REFRAD Order Number 
259-0055 with an effective date of 10 November 2010.

   d.  On 13 December 2010, the FSM received a DA Form 2173 that confirmed his diagnosis of cancer with an effective date of 25 July 2010 at 1307 hours.

   e.  On 19 January 2011, the FSM received a memorandum for medical opinion of in line of duty evaluation.
   f.  On 15 February 2011, the FSM received a memorandum of approval for in line of duty illness incurred while on active duty.

   g.  On 24 January 2012, the FSM's spouse received his death certificate with an effective date of 23 January 2012.

   h.  On 21 February 2012, AZARNG processed an extension memorandum for incapacitation pay for the period 1 through 23 January 2012.

   i.  On 23 February 2013, the AZARNG completed a DA Form 1300 (Report of Casualty) with an effective date of 23 January 2012.

   j.  The FSM's demobilization process should have placed him into a Warrior Transition Unit (WTU) instead of the AZARNG erroneously placing him in a non-duty status to receive incapacitation pay until his death.  Documents show that each time the AZARNG only requested incapacitation pay and the requests were approved.  Being in this status precluded his family from the many benefits that a Soldier normally receives while serving on active duty as well as becoming ill or injured in the line of duty.

   k.  Additionally, the AZARNG could have requested to retain the FSM through a Medical Retention Processing Packet.  Records show that neither the AZARNG nor the FSM made this request.

   l.  In order for approval of active duty vs. non-active duty status to be corrected, it is recommended that U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), the approval authority, take the lead for creating orders to place the FSM in an active duty status from 11 November 2010 to 23 January 2012.  The NGB does not have the authority to publish Title 10 orders for any ARNG Soldier.
Additionally, it is recommended that once all necessary corrections are made, that the FSM's family receive all back pay and allowances plus benefits owed to the FSM at the time of his death in an active duty status.

   m.  The NGB Medical Administration Section reviewed this case on
12 November 2014, 5 December 2014, and 7 January 2015 and concurs with the findings and recommendations.  The AZARNG also concurs with this recommendation.

   n.  On 20 January 2015, a copy of the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for information and to allow her the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal.  She did not respond.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request to place the FSM on Title 10 orders in an active duty status for the period 11 November 2010 to 23 January 2012, and entitlement to all back pay and allowances, plus benefits the FSM would have been entitled to at the time of his death has been carefully examined and found to have merit.  

2.  The available evidence shows the FSM's demobilization process should have placed him into a WTU instead of erroneously placing him in a non-duty status to receive incapacitation pay until his death.  Documents show that each time the AZARNG only requested incapacitation pay and the requests were approved.  Being in this status precluded his family from the many benefits that a Soldier normally receives while serving on active duty as well as becoming ill or injured in the line of duty.

3.  Therefore, in the interest of justice and equity, it is recommended that HRC, the approval authority, take the lead in creating orders to place the FSM in an active duty status from 11 November 2010 to 23 January 2012.  In addition, it is recommended that once all necessary corrections are made, that the FSM's family receive all back pay and allowances, plus benefits that would be owed to the FSM at the time of his death in an active duty status.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and Army National Guard records of the FSM concerned be corrected by placing the FSM in an active duty status from 11 November 2010 to 23 January 2012.  Once all necessary corrections are made, the Defense 


Finance and Accounting Service should correct the FSM's pay records and ensure the FSM's family receives all back pay and allowances, plus benefits owed to the FSM at the time of his death in an active duty status.



      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140017711



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140017711



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023154

    Original file (20110023154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant now requests: a. placement on continuous active duty orders from the date of his mobilization on 1 May 2006 through his retirement date of 29 August 2011; b. payment/credit (pay, benefits, and retirement credit) as a result of his placement on continuous active duty orders; c. reimbursement for TRICARE premiums he made while not covered (as a result of being on incapacitation pay) during the previously mentioned time frame; and d. voidance of all previous DD Forms 214/NGB Forms...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020711

    Original file (20110020711.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The civilian medical documents the applicant provided show, in part, the FSM's diagnoses, prognosis, procedures, and follow-on medical care as described below. He was not diagnosed with any medical condition at this time. b. NGB further stated that based on documentation obtained from the Electronic Medical Management Processing System, a diagnosis of the FSM's disease should have been determined while he was on AD, thus found to be in the LOD on 4 March 2012. c. The advisory opinion also...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017979

    Original file (20110017979.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests the FSM be granted 6 months of incapacitation (INCAP) pay. In December 2010, the FSM applied to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) for INCAP pay. As a result, the Board recommends that the State National Guard Records and the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the FSM's request for INCAP pay was approved in a timely manner; and b. paying to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012109

    Original file (20080012109.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that the DVA rated the FSM's cancer as service-connected and granted him death benefits "because the veteran died of a condition that was military service related" (exhibit F). Bilateral pleural based masses were present, greater on the right. There is no evidence of any multiple myeloma cancer cells during the process of the FSM's retirement physical examination or his prior medical evaluation for back pain.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018522

    Original file (20140018522.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In July 2010, while on active duty, he received an MRI scan on his back. The applicant states he wasn’t told until January 2012 when he started to receive chemotherapy of any indication of the possibility of cancer or that an evaluation was recommended back in July 2010. It is likely, however, that even if the applicant stayed on active duty beyond 23 September 2011, that the Secretary concerned most likely would have denied his request to complete his 20 years of active duty service based...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011504

    Original file (20130011504.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests adjustment of his date of rank (DOR) for promotion to Chief Warrant Officer Three (CW3) from 5 June 2013 to 1 November 2010. The applicant is currently serving in the AZARNG in the rank of CW3. It's unfair to see his peers be promoted while he had to wait an additional two years just to attend a promotion course.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017181

    Original file (20110017181.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    References: * Title 10, USC, section 10145: Ready Reserve – Placement In * Title 10, USC, section 12213: Officers – Army Reserve: Transfer from ARNGUS * Title 10, USC, section 12215: Commissioned Officers – Reserve Grade of Adjutant Generals and AAG's * Title 10, USC, section 14003: Reserve Active Status List (RASL) – Position of Officers on the List * Title 10, USC, section 14507: Removal from the RASL for Years of Service, Reserve Lieutenant Colonels and COL's of the Army, Air Force, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022988

    Original file (20110022988.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * the FSM served on active duty from 1 January 2007 through 23 October 2008 (about 22 months) with a few weeks break * he had moles removed and a biopsy for skin cancer while on active duty * he was informed that the biopsy reports would be available soon after his release from active duty * the report was lost and within 1 year he went from having moles to having stage 4 cancer * the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) granted him service connected compensation at the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011465

    Original file (20130011465.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The FSM reported pain in his tailbone. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and Army National Guard records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * revoking Orders 129-1154, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort McCoy, WI, on 9 May 2011, releasing the FSM from active duty and voiding his DD Form 214 ending on 2 June 2011 * publishing orders showing the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120014213

    Original file (20120014213.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It shows: a. the applicant requested early retirement in the rank of MSG/E-8, to include all retirement pay and benefits with respect to this rank and grade, in lieu of any pending administrative reduction proceedings under Army Regulation 600-8-19, paragraph 10-5; b. if granted early retirement in lieu of reduction proceedings, he respectfully requested to complete this calendar year in his current duty assignment within the 98th MEB; c. his request did not serve as a waiver of his right to...