Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017692
Original file (20140017692.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  2 June 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140017692 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show his award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was awarded the Purple Heart for an injury to his right arm during a rocket attack in Ti Nang, South Vietnam.  However, it is not reflected on his DD Form 214. 

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 and two newspaper articles.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted on 5 September 1968.  He completed his basic training at Fort Campbell, Kentucky and his advanced individual training as a cannoneer at Fort Sill, Oklahoma and was transferred to Vietnam on 20 January 1969.

3.  He was assigned to Battery A, 1st Battalion, 27th Artillery Regiment and was promoted to the rank of sergeant on 19 November 1969.  He departed Vietnam on 18 January 1970 and was transferred back to Fort Sill.

4.  On 4 June 1970, he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) due to seasonal employment.  He had served 1 year and 9 months of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. 

5.  A review of his official records failed to show any indication that the applicant was wounded and his records do not contain orders awarding him the Purple Heart.  Additionally, his name is not contained on the Vietnam Casualty Listing. 

6.  One of the newspaper articles provided by the applicant with his application indicates that the applicant was promoted to sergeant and he received the Purple Heart.  The source of the article is not present.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  Award of the Purple Heart must be announced in orders.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the sincerity of the applicant’s claim that he was wounded/injured in Vietnam and that he was awarded the Purple Heart is not in doubt, he has failed to show through the evidence of record or evidence submitted with his application sufficient evidence to support his contention.

2.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to show that he was wounded,  that medical treatment was made a matter of official record, or that he was awarded the Purple Heart, there appears to be no basis to grant his request at this time.


.  
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Vietnam War.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.


      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140017692





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140017692



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017059

    Original file (20140017059.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that he be awarded an additional award of the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050015083C070206

    Original file (AR20050015083C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 18 August 1969; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 17 August 1972. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023125

    Original file (20110023125.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He volunteered for duty in Vietnam and was transferred to Vietnam on 8 July 1970. In the absence of evidence to show his treatment was made a matter of official record, there appears to be insufficient evidence to warrant awarding him the Purple Heart at this time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001801

    Original file (20120001801.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021546

    Original file (20140021546.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 November 1969, he was transferred to Fort Knox, Kentucky where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 20 January 1971 due to the expiration of his term of service. There is also no evidence of his being awarded the Purple Heart. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to show that he was wounded as a result of enemy action and that treatment was made a matter of record, there appears to be no basis for granting his request for a Purple Heart at this time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006231

    Original file (20090006231.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He departed Vietnam on 8 January 1970 and was transferred to Fort Carson, Colorado, where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 26 February 1971 due to the deactivation of his unit. While the sincerity of the applicant's claim to entitlement to award of the Purple Heart and the BSM for the action on 27 May 1969 (presumably a BSM for valor) is not in question, there is no evidence in the applicant's military records, and the applicant failed to provide any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022548

    Original file (20110022548.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of the applicant’s official military personnel file and the available medical records failed to show any evidence indicating the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action or that he received treatment for such wounds or injuries. While the applicant has provided medical records showing he was treated for headaches at Fort Meade in March 1968 those records do not serve as sufficient evidence to show he was wounded in Vietnam as a result of enemy action nor does it...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011243

    Original file (20110011243.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show his foreign service in the Republic of Vietnam and award of the Purple Heart. There is no evidence of record and he did not provide any substantive evidence that shows he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000805

    Original file (20100000805.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Individuals who had qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and were evacuated prior to completing six months of service due to wounds resulting from hostile action were entitled to award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal. While there is no evidence in the available records showing that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action, there is evidence of record that shows he was a patient in at least two medical facilities. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018861

    Original file (20090018861.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). A review of the applicant’s official records and the Vietnam Casualty Listing failed to reveal any evidence to show that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action while in Vietnam or that he was ever reported as a battle casualty. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.