Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018861
Original file (20090018861.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
		BOARD DATE:	  29 April 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090018861 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in Vietnam.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was wounded in Vietnam by a bullet in the right side of his face and shrapnel to his right leg and that he should be awarded the Purple Heart.  He further states that he was awarded the Purple Heart; however, he refused to accept it.  He also states he has filed a claim for Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) benefits.

3.  The applicant provides a third-party statement from an individual who claims that he witnessed the applicant refusing the award of the Purple Heart in the hospital at Da Nang in 1971.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a 


substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States in Roanoke, VA on 15 April 1970.  He completed his training as a field artillery cannoneer at Fort Sill, OK and was transferred to Vietnam on 11 January 1971.  He was assigned to C Battery, 3d Battalion, 82d Artillery Regiment and was advanced to the rank/pay grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4 on 6 July 1971.

3.  He departed Vietnam on 19 December 1971 and was transferred to Fort Lewis, WA where he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on
20 December 1971 as an overseas returnee.  He had served 1 year, 8 months, and 3 days of total active service.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal with 1st oak leaf cluster, National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle (M-16) Bar, and two Overseas Service Bars.

4.  A review of the applicant’s official records and the Vietnam Casualty Listing failed to reveal any evidence to show that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action while in Vietnam or that he was ever reported as a battle casualty.  Additionally, a Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.

5.  The supporting third-party statement submitted by the applicant is from an individual who claims he was in the hospital with the applicant and that he witnessed the applicant refusing the award of the Purple Heart.  That individual’s name is also not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Listing.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the sincerity of the applicant’s claim that he was wounded as a result of enemy action and that he refused the award of the Purple Heart while in the hospital is not in doubt, there simply is no evidence in the available records to substantiate his claim.

2.  The supporting statement has also been noted; however, that in itself is not sufficient to establish the applicant’s entitlement to award of the Purple Heart some 39 years after the fact.

3.  Therefore, in the absence of sufficient evidence to show that he was wounded as a result of hostile action and that the treatment for his wounds were made a matter of record, there appears to be no basis to grant him award of the Purple Heart at this time.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

5.  The ABCMR does not correct records solely for the purpose of making the applicant eligible for veterans or medical benefits.  Every case is individually decided based upon its merits when an applicant requests a correction of records.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x_____  ___x_____  __x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 


are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018861



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018861



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014545

    Original file (20090014545.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). In his request the applicant claims he injured his back on an unknown date in July of 1970 in the RVN, and he provides a letter from a comrade that was written more than 22 years later in support of his request. _________X_________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012214

    Original file (20080012214.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant essentially states that he was injured by sniper fire while serving in Vietnam and that he was not aware that he might be eligible for award of the Purple Heart. While the sincerity of the applicant's claim to entitlement to award of the Purple Heart is not in question, the evidence provided by the applicant more than 39 years after his alleged wounding does not prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011227

    Original file (20140011227.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    All units assigned in Vietnam from 8 February 1962 through 28 March 1973 were awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, based on Department of the Army General Order Number 8, dated 1974. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), then in effect, provided that the Purple Heart was awarded to any member of an Armed Force or any civilian national of the United States who, while serving under competent authority in any capacity with one of the U.S. armed services...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006696C070205

    Original file (20060006696C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 October 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060006696 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant provides a copy of his DA Form 20; a photocopy of an envelope; a DA Form 8-119 (Hospital Arrival Notice); and a copy of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge). Evidence shows that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002638C070206

    Original file (20050002638C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service record shows that he was inducted into the U.S. Army on 18 May 1970. There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel record which shows that he was awarded the Purple Heart and his DA Form 20 does not show an entry in Item 40 (Wounds) or list the Purple Heart in Item 41 (Awards and Decorations). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant (then, a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019343

    Original file (20140019343.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart. (3) Thus, these three statements (that do not show any evidence of being eyewitness statements) provide insufficient evidence to support a claim to the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001418

    Original file (20140001418.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His records contain General Orders (GO) Number 28, issued by Headquarters, 54th Field Artillery Group, on 15 June 1969, awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in Vietnam on 18 May 1969. GO awarded him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 18 May 1969, and he states he was awarded the Purple Heart for his June 1969 wounds. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017527

    Original file (20070017527.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), issued at the time of his release from active duty (REFRAD) shows, in Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) that he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal, Air Medal, National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with (M-14) Rifle Bar. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004887

    Original file (20110004887.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The former fellow Soldier stated: * a rocket penetrated the bunker in the applicant's sleeping area * the applicant was not seriously injured in the attack * he assessed the applicant's injuries and determined he didn't need medical care beyond his own medical treatment and bandaging * he failed to complete a Field Medical Card for the applicant's injuries * he provided a copy of his own DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014033

    Original file (20080014033.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214, dated 20 June 1972, does not show award of the Purple Heart. There are no general orders in the applicant's records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: There are no general orders that show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart; there is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds; and the applicant's name is not...