Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015843
Original file (20140015843.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	
		BOARD DATE:	  23 April 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140015843 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was promoted to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5. 

2.  The applicant states he was the only African American assigned to the 199th Light Infantry Division, Vietnam.  His superior officer threatened to make his life a living hell as long as he was assigned to the unit because he was a “n----r.”  The officer and other Soldiers set the applicant's feet on fire while he was sleeping after three days and nights of intense combat.  When the applicant awoke, the Soldiers were all laughing at him, calling him a “n----r”, and he was refused treatment for his burns.  Just as his superior officer promised, the applicant never received a promotion to SGT/E-5, but all of the other Soldiers were promoted to the next rank. 

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 9 October 1967.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 11C (Indirect Fire Crewman).  He was advanced to private (PV2)/E-2 on 9 February 1968.

3.  He served in Vietnam from 31 March 1968 to 27 March 1969 with the 199th Infantry Brigade.

4.  On 6 April 1968, shortly after his arrival in Vietnam, Headquarters, 199th Infantry Brigade (Sep) (Light) published Special Orders Number 97 appointing him to private first class (PFC)/E-3 effective 6 April 1968.

5.  On 23 November 1968, Headquarters, 199th Infantry Brigade (Sep) (Light) published Special Orders Number 328 appointing him to specialist four (SP4)/E-4 effective 11 November 1968.

6.  On 17 July 1969, he underwent a separation physical at Fort Benning, GA.  His Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination) listed his rank as  "SP4/E-4."

7.  Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the entry SP4/E-4 as the highest rank/grade he held.

8.  Special Orders Number 274, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Infantry Center, Fort Benning, GA, dated 1 October 1969, released the applicant from active duty and transferred him to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) in the rank/grade of SP4/E-4.

9.  His service records do not contain official orders promoting him to SGT/E-5. 

10.  On 8 October 1969, he was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining obligation.  He completed 2 years of creditable active service.  His DD Form 214 shows in:

* Items 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and 5b (Pay Grade) the entries "SP4" and "E-4" respectively
* Item 6 (Date of Rank) the entry "11 Nov 68"
11.  Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), in effect at the time, prescribed policies, responsibilities, and procedures pertaining to career management of Army enlisted personnel.  Chapter 7 contained Army-wide promotion policy and procedures.  It stated, in pertinent part, that the promotion of enlisted personnel to grade E-5 through E-9, appointments, grade reductions, and grade restoration were announced in orders.  

12.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), then in effect, established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.      Chapter 2 of the regulation contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states, in pertinent part, that items 5a and 5b will show the active duty rank and pay grade at time of the Soldier's separation taken from the Soldier’s promotion/reduction orders.  Item 6 shows the date of rank.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The available evidence is insufficient to correct the applicant's DD Form 214 to show he was promoted to or released from active duty in the rank of SGT/E-5. His service records do not contain official orders promoting him to SGT/E-5, his DA Form 20 shows the highest rank/grade he attained was SP4/E-4, and his separation orders listed his rank as SP4.  In the absence of documentary evidence confirming he was promoted/appointed to SGT/E-5 the evidence is insufficient as a basis for granting the requested relief. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  __X______  _X____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140015843





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140015843



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016452

    Original file (20140016452.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    SO Number 13, issued by D Troop, 7th Squadron, 17th Cavalry Regiment on 14 February 1969 appointed him to the temporary (T) rank/grade of SP4/E-4 effective 14 February 1969. The evidence of record shows the applicant was advanced to SGT/E-5 on 21 May 1968. The evidence of record shows that at the time of his separation, on 22 August 1969, the applicant held the rank/pay grade of SP4 (T)/E-4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001091

    Original file (20080001091.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his rank in Item 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) of his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show SGT because his rank was E-5 when he separated from the Army. Army Retirees and Veterans who terminated their service prior to October 1, 2002, and who request previously approved awards, such as requests for orders, certificates, and medal sets must submit their requests to the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) in St. Louis, Missouri. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028075

    Original file (20100028075.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * his rank/grade as a sergeant (SGT)/E-5 * award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) 2. On 8 June 1971, Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division (Mechanized) published Special Orders Number 159 ordering his release from active duty effective 11 June 1971. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012787

    Original file (20100012787.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was assigned duties as a Drill Sergeant on 29 July 1969; thus, he was a SGT from that date to his date of discharge on 17 December 1969. Item 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the rank of SP4 (T) and item 5b (Pay Grade) shows the pay grade of E-4. There are no orders in the applicant's records that show he was promoted to the rank of SGT.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003335C070206

    Original file (20050003335C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 November 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050003335 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his rank and pay grade as sergeant (SGT), E-5. In addition, it would be appropriate to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018209

    Original file (20130018209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected show: * his rank as sergeant (SGT) * he was assigned as a Drill Instructor and awarded the associated military occupational specialty (MOS) 2. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 includes an entry showing he was assigned to HHD, 2nd Battalion, 1st Brigade, Fort Jackson, SC, in duty MOS 00F4O Drill Sergeant, effective 3 August 1970. The applicant’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006573

    Original file (20130006573.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the following corrections of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge): * Item 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) to show the rank of sergeant (SGT) * Item 5b (Pay Grade) to show E-5 * Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) to show the Purple Heart and Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation 2. This pamphlet shows his unit, 1st Battalion, 20th...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000510

    Original file (20110000510.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 July 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110000510 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Following his tour in Vietnam, the applicant was reassigned to Fort Benning, GA for duty with Company A, 5th Battalion, 31st Infantry. Item 33 of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the following appointments and reductions: * PVT/E-1 on 5 February 1968 * PV2/E-2 on 12 April 1968 [accelerated promotion] * PFC/E-3 on 20 July 1968 * SP4/E-4 on 12 January...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022190

    Original file (20100022190.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show in: a. item 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) the entry "SGT"; b. item 5b (Pay Grade) the entry "E-5"; c. item 6 (Date of Rank) the entry "22 May 1970"; and d. item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) his list of awards to include the: * Bronze Star Medal with First Oak Leaf Cluster * Army Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001885

    Original file (20090001885.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction to item 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and item 5b (Pay Grade) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) from specialist four (temporary) (SP4 (T))/E-4 to sergeant (SGT)/E-5. There are no special orders in the applicant’s record that show he was promoted to SGT/E-5. The evidence of record shows that at the time of his separation on 29 November 1968, the applicant held the rank/grade of SP4/E-4.