Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012787
Original file (20100012787.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  20 October 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100012787 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous request to correct his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his rank/grade as sergeant (SGT)/E-5.

2.  The applicant states he was assigned duties as a Drill Sergeant on 29 July 1969; thus, he was a SGT from that date to his date of discharge on
17 December 1969.  He adds his military pay records will confirm his rank as SGT.

3.  The applicant provides:

* a copy of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) showing in Item 38 (Record of Assignments) that his principal duty on 29 July 1969 was "Drill Sergeant"
* a copy of an Army Commendation Medal Certificate showing he was a specialist four (SP4)/E-4 on 1 June 1969

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20090014638, on 23 February 2010.


2.  The applicant's DA Form 20 is not new evidence as it was considered during the original proceedings.  However, the Army Commendation Medal Certificate is new evidence requiring consideration by the Board.  Additionally, the applicant's contention his pay records will prove his rank is a new argument which also requires consideration by the Board.

3.  The applicant served in the Army of the United States from 4 January 1968 to 17 December 1969.  Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) of his DA Form 20 shows his appointments as follows:

* private (PV1)/E-1, effective 4 January 1968, by authority of Army Regulation 601-270
* private (PVT)/E-2, effective 4 May 1968, by authority of Army Regulation 600-200
* private first class (PFC)/E-3, effective 29 June 1968, by authority of Special Orders (SO) Number 181, Headquarters (HQ), 4th Infantry Division
* SP4 (T[emporary]), effective 20 June 1969, by authority of SO Number 30, HQ, 4th Infantry Division
* SP4 (P[ermanent]) (USAR), effective 18 December 1969, by authority of Army Regulation 140-158

4.  The applicant provided an Army Commendation Medal Certificate, dated 1 June 1969, that shows his rank as "SPECIALIST FOUR."  The award was for meritorious service in Vietnam from June 1968 to June 1969.

5.  On 29 July 1969, following his reassignment from Vietnam, the applicant was assigned to C Company, 1st Battalion, 3rd Basic Combat Training Brigade, Fort Dix, where he performed duties as a Drill Sergeant.  On 17 December 1969, the applicant was honorably released from active duty by reason of expiration of term of service.  He was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.

6.  Item 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the rank of SP4 (T) and item 5b (Pay Grade) shows the pay grade of E-4.  Item 6 (Date of Rank) shows the entry "20 Jun 69."

7.  There are no orders in the applicant's records that show he was promoted to the rank of SGT.  His military pay records are no longer available.

8.  Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), in effect at the time, governed policy and criteria concerning promotion to pay grades E-4 through E-6.  Promotion quota allocations were required.  It stated that promotion authority to promote to pay grade of E-4 was delegated to company, troop, battery, and separate detachment commanders.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribed the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It established standardized preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states, that item 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and 5b (Pay Grade) will be completed to show the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration to have his rank changed to SGT on his DD Form 214.

2.  The applicant provided an Army Commendation Medal Certificate, dated
1 June 1969, showing his rank as SP4.  This is at variance with his DA Form 20 which shows he was advanced to temporary rank of SP4 on 20 June 1969.  However, the entry on his DA Form 20 is supported by the annotation "SO #30 HQ 4th Inf Div."  This lends greater credence to his actual date of rank to SP4 being 20 June 1969.

3.  The applicant argues he was paid as a SGT and his pay records will prove this.  Unfortunately, his pay records no longer exist.

4.  During the Vietnam era, many Soldiers returning to stateside duty were placed in leadership positions in basic and advanced individual training commands.  Theses Soldiers were made "Acting Sergeants" and permitted to wear the appropriate rank in order to discharge their duties; however, they were not actually sergeants and not paid as such.  It is highly likely the applicant, because of his excellent record and military bearing, was appointed as an "Acting Sergeant" and an assistant Drill Sergeant without actually being promoted to that rank

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20090014638, dated 23 February 2010.



      ____________X__________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100012787



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100012787



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018209

    Original file (20130018209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected show: * his rank as sergeant (SGT) * he was assigned as a Drill Instructor and awarded the associated military occupational specialty (MOS) 2. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 includes an entry showing he was assigned to HHD, 2nd Battalion, 1st Brigade, Fort Jackson, SC, in duty MOS 00F4O Drill Sergeant, effective 3 August 1970. The applicant’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028075

    Original file (20100028075.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * his rank/grade as a sergeant (SGT)/E-5 * award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) 2. On 8 June 1971, Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division (Mechanized) published Special Orders Number 159 ordering his release from active duty effective 11 June 1971. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015522

    Original file (20060015522.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart; the Combat Infantryman Badge; the Good Conduct Medal for the period 6 February 1967 to 1 July 1969; the Vietnam Service Medal, with two bronze service stars; the Republic of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015116

    Original file (20080015116.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show the entry "SGT" (sergeant) instead of the entry "SP4" (specialist four) item 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and to show the entry "E-5" instead of "E-4" in item 5b (Pay Grade). It also states that item 6 will be completed to show the date of rank of the promotion to the current pay grade from the most recent promotion order or reduction instrument. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000253C070208

    Original file (20040000253C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a copy of acting SGT appointment orders, aircraft crewman award orders and separation orders in support of his application. The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no orders or documents indicating that the applicant was ever selected for or promoted to the rank and pay grade of SGT/E-5 by proper authority. He further submits a copy of Special Orders Number 217, dated 5 August 1970, issued by Headquarters, United States Army Personnel...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002226

    Original file (20130002226.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * Promotion orders * DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The regulation, in effect at the time provided that for Item 5a, enlisted personnel would enter the grade in which serving at time of separation, indicating whether permanent or temporary.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008507

    Original file (20120008507.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 19 January 1967. While in Vietnam: * he was issued a certificate that shows he completed the Lightning Combat Leaders Course from 19 to 27 August 1967 * Unit orders Number 49, issued by Headquarters, 4th Battalion, 9th Infantry, on 5 August 1967 promoted him to the permanent (P) rank/grade of private first class/E-3 *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009363

    Original file (20070009363.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 November 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070009363 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show his correct rank and all awards and decorations to which he is entitled. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020309

    Original file (20120020309.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. It stated that promotions of enlisted personnel to grade E-5 through E-9, appointments, grade reductions, and grade restorations were announced in orders. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012970

    Original file (20080012970.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He claims he was promoted to SGT and received awards which were never documented in his record or on his DD Form 214. The record is void of any orders showing he was ever promoted to SGT by proper authority while serving on active duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal, for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 19 February 1968 through 18...