Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015631
Original file (20140015631.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  6 August 2015 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140015631 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her records to show she received a medical retirement.  

2.  The applicant states:

   a.  she experienced many stomach problems during her military career.  As a result of these problems, she believes it developed into her gastric/stomach cancer.  As a result of this diagnosis, her stomach had to be removed.  

   b.  her medical condition has mobilized her to live a very limited lifestyle not being able to go out to restaurants or other gatherings with family and friends.  

3.  The applicant provides numerous medical documents.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 8 September 1983 for a period of three years.  She completed the required training and was awarded military occupational specialty 76P (Material Control and Accounting Specialist).  She served in Germany from 10 January 1984 to 30 May 1985.

3.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 9 July 1986 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4 at her expiration term of service.  On the following day, she was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement).  She had completed 2 years, 10 months, and 2 days of active military service.

4.   Orders D-09-075752 published on 5 September 1989 show she was discharged from the U.S. Army Reserve.  

5.  The applicant provided the following military and civilian medical documents retrieved from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) which show:

	a.  A Standard Form (SF) 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care) shows she was treated at the U.S. Army Health Clinic in Germany on 1 March 1984 for headache pain and pains in her stomach.  The attending physician stated the applicant had burning sensation in her stomach.  

	b.  An SF 600 shows she was treated at the U.S. Army Health Clinic in Germany on 9 April 1984 for lower back pain and leg cramps.  The attending physician noted the applicant hurt her back while digging a foxhole and that her stomach was still hurting and swollen.  

	c.  An SF Form 600 shows she was treated at U.S. Army Health Clinic, Selfridge Air National Guard Base (ANGB), MI on 5 November 1985 for follow-up on stomach pains.  

	d.  A Comprehensive Gynecological History Physical, dated 3 February 1987, shows she was evaluated for complaints of irregular periods associated with cramps and backache sustained since she had her baby.  

	e.  A medical report from the Capital City Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/GYN) Associates, Physical Assistant (PA), dated 20 January 1994, shows she had a hysterectomy in May 1992.  This report shows history of present illness of complaints of lower abdomen cramping pains, some incisional scar swelling, and left breast swelling (unpredictable occurrences).  
	f.  A Capital City OB-GYN Associates, PA, medical report dated 18 January 1995, shows her chief complaint was pain in the right side of her abdomen.  She was diagnosed as having right multi-cystic mass.

	g.  An OB/GYN Medical Report dated 23 June 2003, shows she complained of right pelvic pain and lower back pain (2 days).

	h.  A Radiology Department, Lexington Medical Center, West Columbia, SC medical report, dated 20 April 2005, shows she was examined for abdominal pain.

	i.  A Radiology Department, Lexington Medical Center medical report dated 22 April 2005, shows she was examined for right upper quadrant abdominal pain, nausea, and gastric mass with vomiting.  The examining physician performed a CT [computerized tomography] scan of her abdomen, but there was no abdominal mass, lymphadenopathy or inflammatory process seen.  

	j.  A Radiology Department, Lexington Medical Center medical report dated 15 May 2005, shows she had a subtotal gastrectomy on 10 May 2005.

	k.  Medical documents dated April 2006 through November 2011 show a history of treatment for stomach cancer.  

6.  Her service record is void of evidence which indicates she incurred any medical conditions that required processing through the physical disability evaluation system while she was on active duty.  

7.  Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 61, provides for disability retirement or separation for a member who is physically unfit to perform the duties of his or her office, rank, grade, or rating because of a disability incurred while entitled to basic pay.

8.  Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) governs the evaluation for physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of a physical disability.  The regulation provides that military treatment facility (MTF) will provide a thorough and prompt evaluation when a Soldier's condition becomes questionable in respect to their physical ability to perform duty.  Unit commanders will ensure that any physical defects impacting on a Soldier's performance of duty are reflected in the Soldier's evaluation report and refer the Soldier to the servicing MTF for medical evaluation when the Soldier is believed to be unable to perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating.  It also states that the MTF commander having primary medical care responsibility will conduct an examination of the Soldier referred for evaluation.  If it appears that the Soldier is not medically qualified to perform duty, the MTF commander will refer the Soldier to a medical evaluation board (MEB).  The MEB will recommend referral to a physical evaluation board (PEB) those Soldiers who do not meet medical retention standards.  The PEB in turn determines fitness for duty or accesses a disability rating for each medical condition that is found unfitting.  If the combined total of a disability rating is 30 percent or greater, then a determination is made by the PEB for placement on the temporary disability retired list. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that she experienced many stomach problems during her military career is acknowledged.  

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant served in the Regular Army from 8 September 1983 through 9 July 1986.

3.  The applicant provided medical documents which show she began to experience stomach and lower back pain in 1984 while she was on active duty.  By November 1985, she had follow-up appointments for stomach pains.  Her service record shows she continued to serve on active duty until she was discharged on 9 July 1986.

4.  The applicant provided post-service clinical treatment records from civilian medical personnel which show she was treated for abdominal pain.  Her civilian medical records show she was diagnosed with stomach cancer in 2005 some 19 years after her separation.

5.  The applicant's service record is void of any medical documentation or other evidence that indicates any medical conditions were incurred while she was entitled to receive basic pay which was so severe as to render the applicant medically unfit for retention on active duty.

6.  The applicant's continued performance of assigned duties supports a presumption of fitness which she has not overcome by evidence of any unfitting, acute, grave illness or injury related to her service that prevented her from performing her duties through her separation in 1986.  As such, there was no reason for medical personnel or her unit commander to recommend her for physical disability evaluation processing.  The available records do not show evidence of error in this case.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the requested relief.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140015631





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140015631



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009325

    Original file (20080009325.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that she presented to the Weed Army Community Hospital (WACH) for an intrauterine device (IUD) insertion on 21 March 2008, while still on active duty. The applicant provides a letter, dated 12 June 2008, from her Naval Medical Center doctor; and medical records, dated 21 March, 17 April, 22 April, 24 April, and 26 April 2008. (Although it is also noted that the applicant stated the pains began about a week after the IUD insertion, there is no evidence to show that she...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004578

    Original file (20110004578.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he was medically retired due to physical disability. The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show he was medically discharged or retired due to permanent disability with an appropriate disability rating because a test was never done to determine if his condition was related to cancer and he was diagnosed with carcinomatosis after he was medically discharged. Since there is no evidence of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01186

    Original file (PD2012-01186.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Endometriosis. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Endometriosis, Stage II 7629 COMBINED 30% 30% 3 PD1201186 The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120611, w/atchs Exhibit B. Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005394C070205

    Original file (20060005394C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 2 June 2004, a formal PEB upheld the findings of the informal PEB and again determined that he should be rated at zero percent based on the medical evidence. In light of the applicant’s verified residual symptoms after his gastrectomy, and in accordance with the advisory opinion, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records to show that he was found unfit under VASRD code 7308 for postgastrectomy syndrome, moderate, with weight loss, diarrhea, and circulatory symptoms and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00219

    Original file (PD2013 00219.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB and the VA adjudicated the chronic incisional abdominal pain condition as a painful scar with a service rating of 10%. RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation: Providing orders showing that the individual was retired with permanent disability effective the date of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012109

    Original file (20080012109.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that the DVA rated the FSM's cancer as service-connected and granted him death benefits "because the veteran died of a condition that was military service related" (exhibit F). Bilateral pleural based masses were present, greater on the right. There is no evidence of any multiple myeloma cancer cells during the process of the FSM's retirement physical examination or his prior medical evaluation for back pain.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00387

    Original file (PD-2014-00387.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRDstandards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. She reported GI symptoms 8 months out of the year. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXPresidentDoD Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01642

    Original file (PD-2014-01642.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Fundoplication Surgery Performed in 2001, Unrelated to Military Service.7399-7308--%Rapid Gastric Empting Syndrome7399-730440%20060801Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 520060801 Combined: 10%Combined: 60%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20061120 ( most proximate to date of separation) Chronic Back Pain Condition .Although the service treatment recordbegan back pain documentation in 2005, he related persistent mid/upper back pain since 1993 after falling while conducting hand-to-hand...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02007

    Original file (PD-2013-02007.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Contended Left Foot Condition :The Board then undertook a review of the left foot condition, adjudicated as not unfitting by the PEB, but contested by the CI. The Board noted the presence of a large, well healed abdominal scar consistent with an upper abdominal operative procedure at service entry.The Board found no evidence in the record of any documented major abdominal operations, as would be required for gastric resection, during the duty period or the period of convalescent leave. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068831C070402

    Original file (2002068831C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On an unknown date, he was treated for chronic athlete’s feet and advised to continue his medications (cream and powder). On 13 June 1980, the applicant stated “treatment (for feet) is helping a lot.” On 17 June 1980, he was treated for stomach cramps. He consented to be voluntarily discharged and there is evidence in his discharge packet statement and in his medical records to show he wanted to be discharged as early as February 1980.