Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014723
Original file (20140014723.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  14 April 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140014723 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation), from "Enter Officer Training Program" to "Attend School." 

2.  The applicant states:

* the requested narrative reason for separation (attend school) qualifies him for unemployment benefits 
* he is a prior enlisted Soldier and a full-time student at the University of Texas pursuing a master's degree and an Army commission through the Reserve Officers' Training Program (ROTC) as a non-scholarship cadet
* he is unable to support himself and his dependent parent since separating from the service in 2013 
* he was informed by the Texas Workforce Commission that his separation is not acceptable for unemployment 

3.  The applicant provides:

* Letter from the Texas Workforce Commission 
* Listing of acceptable versus unacceptable reasons for separation
* DD Form 214




CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 4 years and 26 weeks on 13 October 2010.  He was trained in and held military occupational specialty 91F (Small Arms/Artillery). 

2.  On 18 July 2013, Headquarters, III Corps, Fort Hood, TX, published Orders 138-0131 ordering his assignment to the transition center for separation outprocessing, effective 22 July 2013. 

3.  He was honorably discharged in accordance with paragraph 16-2 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) on 22 July 2013.  His DD Form 214 shows he completed 2 years, 9 months, and 10 days of active service.  It also shows in: 

* Item 26 (Separation Code) – KGX
* Item 28 – Enter Officer Training Program

4.  He enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) as a cadet on 23 July 2013.  He was assigned to the USAR Control Group (ROTC). 

5.  On 13 August 2014, in response to his petition, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) reviewed his discharge action and determined the narrative reason for separation was proper and equitable.  As such, the ADRB denied his request.

6.  On 24 December 2014, a scrolling action was forwarded to Office of the Secretary of Defense for potential approval of appointment as a Reserve commissioned officer. 

7.  The applicant provides a letter, dated 13 August 2014, from the Texas Workforce Commission advising him that he does not meet the original first term of service and his separation reason prevents him from qualifying for unemployment.  He also provides a listing of acceptable and unacceptable reasons, one of which is to attend civilian school. 

8.  Army Regulation 635-200 provides for the separation of enlisted personnel from active duty.

	a.  Chapter 5 provides for separation for the convenience of the Government. Paragraph 5-15 provides for early separation to further education.  It states Soldiers may be discharged or released from active duty for the convenience of the Government up to 90 days before expiration of term of service in order to attend a specific term at college, university, vocational school, or technical school.

	b.  Chapter 16 provides for separations caused by changes in service obligations.  Paragraph 16-2 of this regulation states a Soldier may be discharged for the purpose of entering a program leading to a commission or warrant officer appointment in any branch of the Armed Forces, including ROTC and Officer Candidate School.  The characterization of such discharge would be honorable. 

8.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) states that SPD codes are three-character alphabetic combinations which identify reasons for and types of separation from active duty.  Table 2–3 lists the SPD codes applicable to enlisted personnel. 

	a.  SPD code "KCF" is the correct code for Soldiers separating (voluntary discharge) under the provisions of paragraph 5-16 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of "Attend Civilian School." 

	b.  SPD code "KGX" is the correct code for Soldiers separating (voluntary discharge) under the provisions of paragraph 16-2 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of "Enter Officer Training Program."

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant enlisted for 4 years and 26 weeks on 13 January 2010.  His ETS date was established as 12 June 2014.  He applied for a commission and subsequently enlisted in an ROTC program.  Accordingly, he was honorably discharged prior to completion of his term of service to attend an officer training program.  The applicant was not discharged because he wanted to attend civilian school.  Such discharge action is authorized up to 90 days before a Soldier's ETS.  This is not the case here.

2.  The applicant's narrative reason for separation was assigned based on the fact that he was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 16-2 of Army Regulation 635-200 because of his voluntary request to enter an officer training program.  Absent this voluntary request, there was no fundamental reason to discharge him.  The underlying reason for his discharge was his voluntary request to enter an officer training program.  The only valid narrative reason for separation permitted under that paragraph is "Enter an officer training program" and the appropriate separation code associated with this discharge is "KGX" which is correctly shown on his DD Form 214.

3.  The ABCMR does not correct records solely for the purpose of establishing eligibility for other programs or benefits.  His narrative reason for separation is correct.  He is not entitled to correction of his narrative reason for separation.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140014723





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140014723



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058477C070421

    Original file (2001058477C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that block 28 (narrative reason for separation) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect “to attend school”. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005995

    Original file (20090005995.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from "Enter Officer Training Program" to "Attend School and Enter Officer Training Program (ROTC)" [Reserve Officers’ Training Corps]. On 20 December 2008. the applicant was honorably discharged from the Regular Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), paragraph 16-2, to enter an officer training...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070539C070402

    Original file (2002070539C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he separated from the Army to enter a commissioning program known as Green to Gold. The evidence of record indicates the applicant was separated for the purpose of entering the Green to Gold Program, however, an administrative error reflecting the incorrect authority and SPD code was entered on his DD Form 214. While he was on active duty, the applicant was awarded the Humanitarian Service Medal, and is entitled to a correction of his records to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083543C070212

    Original file (2003083543C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The DD Form 214 also confirms that the authority for the applicant’s separation was paragraph 16-2, Army Regulation 635-200, and the reason was to enter an officer training program. The record also shows that the applicant was properly assigned the SPD code of KGX in accordance with the applicable regulation based on the authority and reason for his separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014895C071029

    Original file (20060014895C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 25 (Authority for Separation), Item 26 (Separation Code) and Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of his 27 July 2006 separation document be corrected. On 1 November 2006, AHRC-St. Louis published an amendment to the applicant's separation order (C-05-690868) and added additional instructions that confirmed the applicant was REFRAD based on his acceptance into the WOC program and that he was authorized to retain his SRB in accordance with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006799

    Original file (20080006799.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show that he has completed a first full term of service. The evidence shows that the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for 4 years. Army Regulation 635-5 states that in order to determine if an enlisted Soldier has completed the first full term of enlistment you must compare the term(s) of enlistment to the net service in block 12c of the DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080014557

    Original file (AR20080014557.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant was discharged from the Army on 26 May 2008 b. Chapter 5, paragraph 5-16, stipulates that Soldiers may be discharged or released from active duty for the convenience of the Government, up to 90 days before ETS, in order to attend a specific term at college, university, vocational school, or technical school. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130014488

    Original file (AR20130014488.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 March 2013, the separation authority, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, for the commission of serious offenses. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022218

    Original file (20130022218.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    f. Once he became obligated and was disenrolled from the ROTC Program for breach of contractual terms or any other disenrollment criteria – (1) he agreed to serve on enlisted active duty for a period of not more than 4 years or (2) if offered the opportunity to repay his advanced educational assistance in lieu of being ordered to active duty, he would be required to reimburse the U.S. Government an amount equal to the entire amount of financial assistance paid by the United States for his...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130013154

    Original file (AR20130013154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests to upgrade the characterization of his service from general, under honorable conditions to fully honorable, and to change the narrative reason for his discharge. He was discharged as a SPC/E-4. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided an affidavit in support of warrantless arrest, dated 30 September 2012; county court document indicates, on 21 March 2013, a motion to dismiss a case against the applicant was granted because no officer was available...