Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014631
Original file (20140014631.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  2 April 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140014631 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected transfer of his educational benefits to his dependents under the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability provision.

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  The error is the information he was given about the Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits after he returned from Afghanistan in 2008.  He was informed that he was not eligible for the benefits so he never transferred them to his son.  When he retired in 2013, he was informed that he was eligible for the benefits, but it was too late to transfer them.

	b.  His son began his freshman year at Missouri State University in 2014.

	c.  In 2008, he returned to Fort Leonard Wood, MO, after a deployment to Afghanistan.  He had 4 years of service remaining before retirement.  He was assigned to the Inspector General's Office for the remainder of his military service.

	d.  The unit retention noncommissioned officer provided a class on the 
Post-9/11 GI Bill during a company meeting.  During the question portion he asked if he could transfer his educational benefits to his son.  He told the retention noncommissioned officer that he did not sign up for any educational benefits when he entered the military in 1979.  He was told he did not qualify for the Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits.  When it was time for him to retire he was informed he was eligible for the educational benefits, but it was too late to transfer these benefits to his son.

	e.  He did not want to waste his benefits so he started taking classes.  The classes are taking a toll on his health and he does not wish to continue.  He would like his son to use his educational benefits to continue his education.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  After completing over 20 years of creditable active service, the applicant retired on 28 February 2013 in the rank of sergeant first class.

2.  There is no evidence of record which shows he attempted to transfer his 
Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement.

3.  On 22 June 2009, the Department of Defense (DOD) established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members.  The policy in effect at the time stated an eligible individual was any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of approval of the individual's request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, was eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and:

	a.  had at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agreed to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election; or

	b.  had at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, was precluded by either standard policy (service or DOD) or statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agreed to serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or statute; or

	c.  was or became retirement eligible during the period 1 August 2009 through 1 August 2013.  A service member was considered to be retirement eligible if he or she had completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service.

4.  The policy further stated the Secretaries of the Military Departments would provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill, document accordingly, and maintain records for individuals who receive supplemental educational assistance under Public Law 110-252, section 3316.

5.  DOD, the Army, and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) initiated a massive public campaign plan that generated major communications through military, public, and social media venues on the Post-9/11 GI Bill and subsequent transfer of educational benefits.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions were carefully considered; however, DOD, the Army, and the VA conducted a massive public campaign plan that generated major communications through military, public, and social media venues.  The information was published well in advance with emphasis on the criteria.  While there may have been some confusion during the early stages after the implementation, the applicant retired almost 4 years after the program was implemented.

2.  There is no evidence indicating he was not given proper guidance regarding the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

3.  Since there is no evidence of record showing he attempted to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement, there is no basis for granting the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x_____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140014631



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140014631



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010903

    Original file (20120010903.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Public Law 110-252 also established the legal requirements for the transferability of unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009. c. The applicant's last day of service with the Army National Guard was 31 January 2011. The evidence of record shows the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve on 31 January 2011. As the applicant failed to transfer the benefits to his son while...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011261

    Original file (20140011261.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show she elected transfer of her educational benefits to her dependents under the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability provision. The policy states an eligible individual is any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of approval of the individual's request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and: a. has at least 6 years of service in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014779

    Original file (20140014779.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected to transfer his educational benefits to his dependents under the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability provision. He provided email correspondence which indicates: * he attempted to transfer Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to a dependent in July/August 2014 * he was informed by an ARNG official he could not transfer benefits to a new dependent after retirement and he should petition the Army Board for Correction of Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021875

    Original file (20120021875.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected transfer of his educational benefits to his spouse and son under the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability provision. DOD, the Army, and the VA initiated a massive public campaign plan that generated major communications through military, public, and social media venues on the Post-9/11 GI Bill and subsequent transfer of educational benefits. There is no evidence of record and he provided no evidence which shows he transferred...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013907

    Original file (20140013907.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected transfer of his education benefits to his dependents under the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability provision. There is no evidence of record which shows he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement. Since there is no evidence of record which shows he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement, there is no basis for granting the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019514

    Original file (20130019514.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he transferred his educational benefits to his sons under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The Army did not have a record of his GI Bill. Records show the applicant was eligible to transfer his educational benefits under the TEB prior to retirement, but there is no convincing evidence showing he did so.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020756

    Original file (20120020756.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he gave 50 percent of his Post-9/11 GI Bill to his son; however, after he turned the form in to his personnel section it was never processed, presumably due to his unit deploying. There is no evidence in the applicant's records and the applicant provided no evidence to show he had taken action to transfer benefits to his son prior to retiring from service. On 22 June 2009, the Department of Defense (DOD) established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021979

    Original file (20130021979.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record does not contain any documentation that indicates he transferred, or attempted to transfer, his education benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill, prior to his date of retirement. c. A Soldier may only transfer to eligible dependents. On 22 June 2009, DOD established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012277

    Original file (20130012277.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests transfer of his educational benefits to an additional dependent under the Post 9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program. His record is void of evidence showing he designated additional dependents to receive transferred benefits prior to retirement and he does not provide such evidence. The evidence of record shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his education benefits under the Post 9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program prior to his retirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014264

    Original file (20140014264.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected transfer of his educational benefits to his dependents under the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability provision. There is no evidence that shows he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement. The policy further stated the Secretaries of the Military Departments would provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service...