Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014779
Original file (20140014779.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		BOARD DATE:	  5 May 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140014779 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected to transfer his educational benefits to his dependents under the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability provision.

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  He recently retired from the South Carolina Army National Guard (SCARNG) and was not allowed to transfer his remaining Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to a new dependent.

	b.  When he was deployed on active duty in 2009, he transferred his educational benefits to his oldest daughter.  He did not know he would be blocked from making future transfers after retirement.  He did not receive this information from the SCARNG during his retirement counseling.  He did not discover this issue until July 2014 when he attempted to transfer the educational benefits to his son.

	c.  This situation is jeopardizing his son's college career and therefore is unjust.

	d.  He should be allowed to transfer his remaining 15 months of educational benefits to his dependents since he had no knowledge that his retirement would alter his right to make this modification.



3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) emails
* National Guard Bureau and SCARNG emails

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  After completing over 29 years of service, he was separated from the SCARNG on 31 May 2013 and transferred to the Retired Reserve in the rank of lieutenant colonel.

2.  He provided email correspondence which indicates:

* he attempted to transfer Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to a dependent in July/August 2014
* he was informed by an ARNG official he could not transfer benefits to a new dependent after retirement and he should petition the Army Board for Correction of Military Records

3.  On 22 June 2009, the Department of Defense (DOD) established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members.  The policy states an eligible individual is any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of approval of the individual's request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and:

	a.  has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election; or

	b.  has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either standard policy (service or DOD) or statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agrees to serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or statute; or

	c.  is or becomes retirement eligible during the period 1 August 2009 through 1 August 2013.  A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service.

4.  The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill, document accordingly, and maintain records for individuals who receive supplemental educational assistance under Public Law 110-252, section 3316.

5.  DOD, the Army, and the VA initiated a massive public campaign plan that generated major communications through military, public, and social media venues on the Post-9/11 GI Bill and subsequent transfer of educational benefits.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he should be allowed to transfer his remaining 15 months of educational benefits to his dependents since he had no knowledge his retirement would alter his right to make this modification.

2.  There is no evidence indicating he was not given proper guidance regarding the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill.  Apparently he transferred educational benefits to a dependent in 2009.

3.  His remaining contentions were carefully considered; however, DOD, the Army, and the VA conducted a massive public campaign plan that generated major communications through military, public, and social media venues.  The information was published well in advance with emphasis on the criteria.  While there may have been some confusion during the early stages after implementation (first 90 days), the applicant transferred to the Retired Reserve nearly 4 years after the program was announced and implemented.

4.  Based on the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X______  __X______  _X___  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X______________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140014779



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140014779



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012277

    Original file (20130012277.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests transfer of his educational benefits to an additional dependent under the Post 9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program. His record is void of evidence showing he designated additional dependents to receive transferred benefits prior to retirement and he does not provide such evidence. The evidence of record shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his education benefits under the Post 9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program prior to his retirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003641

    Original file (20140003641.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected transfer of his educational benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The applicant states he was unable to transfer his educational benefits and he was not informed to transfer benefits prior to his retirement. The policy states an eligible individual is any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of approval of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006467

    Original file (20140006467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect: * despite the massive publicity campaign prior to his retirement, not all information operations/campaigns are 100-percent effective * he was informed of the procedure to change from the Montgomery GI Bill to the Post-9/11 GI Bill, but he did not receive clear instructions on how to transfer the benefits to his family members * he saw the education counselor prior to his retirement and expressed his concerns, but he was assured that all family members listed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009431

    Original file (20120009431.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that the Army National Guard (ARNG) did not properly inform him during the time of his retirement that he could transfer his education benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement from the ARNG. The advisory official stated the applicant was eligible for Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits; however, he did not complete a request to transfer benefit on the Department of Defense's (DOD's) TEB online database before he left the service. Contrary to the basis for the approval...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023142

    Original file (20110023142.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he transferred his Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provisions of the Post-9/11 MGIB. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits because their last day of duty will be 31 July 2009 and they will transfer to the Retired List on 1 August 2009. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000336

    Original file (20150000336.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show the date of his transfer of education benefits under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his dependents as 31 July 2012. For those individuals who had an approved retirement date after 1 August 2009 and before 1 July 2010, no additional service was required. Military Personnel Message Number 13-102, dated 15 April 2013, subject: Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB 4-Year Service Obligation for Approved...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014264

    Original file (20140014264.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected transfer of his educational benefits to his dependents under the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability provision. There is no evidence that shows he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement. The policy further stated the Secretaries of the Military Departments would provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011813

    Original file (20100011813.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was on approved retirement transition leave from 19 June 2009 to 31 October 2009 when the final guidance was published which included the requirement to be on active duty to transfer benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill, chapter 33. The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008397

    Original file (20130008397.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show she elected transfer of her educational benefits to her dependent under the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability provision. The applicant states: * her unit did not properly inform her of the requirements of the Post 9/11 GI Bill during her active duty service * while on active duty she repeatedly asked for information to apply for the Post 9/11 GI Bill transfer for her dependent * each time she asked she was told the website had changed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014602

    Original file (20140014602.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected to transfer his educational benefits to his dependents under the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability provision. The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill, document accordingly, and...