Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014273
Original file (20140014273.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  17 September 2014  	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140014273 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 
30 April 2012 and whose MH diagnosis was changed during that process.

3.  The applicant submitted an application through the Department of Defense (DOD) Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system.  

2.  The Department of Defense memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of MH diagnoses for service members completing a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 in order to determine if service members were disadvantaged by a changed diagnosis over the course of their physical disability process.

3.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the PDBR SRP and the applicant was provided a copy.

4.  The applicant did not respond to the advisory opinion.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  After a comprehensive review of the applicant’s case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change to the applicant’s disability and separation determination. 

2.  The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the MH diagnoses; the physical evaluation board (PEB) fitness determination; and if unfitting, whether the provisions of the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) Section 4.129 were applicable; and whether a disability rating recommendation in accordance with VASRD Section 4.130 was made.  There was no change in his MH diagnosis by treating MH providers.  Therefore, the applicant’s case did not meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Project.  

3.  The SRP noted the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Compensation and Pension (C&P) examiner rendered a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), but the service treatment record did not support this diagnosis.  There was no evidence of a traumatic stressor and no evidence of PTSD symptoms at any time other than when the applicant endorsed them at the VA C&P examination.  The SRP therefore concurred with the referred medical evaluation board (MEB) MH diagnoses. 

4.  The SRP next considered whether the MH conditions, regardless of specific diagnosis, were unfitting for continued military service.  The SRP’s charge with respect to MH conditions referred for review that were determined to be not unfitting by the PEB was an assessment of the appropriateness of the PEB’s fitness adjudication.  The SRP’s threshold for countering PEB not-unfit determinations required a preponderance of evidence.  

5.  The SRP noted there was a history of adjustment deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and behavioral issues prior to entering military service and appeared to experience behavioral problems while in service related to his chronic insomnia and ADHD.  He also experienced problems with domestic violence.  Except for periodic exacerbations, symptoms generally described as mild and fairly well controlled with medications.  There was no evidence at times of increased symptoms that the applicant was unable to perform duties and follow-up evaluations reflected improvement.  The SRP noted that service treatment records reflected controlled psychological symptoms prior to the time of referral into the Disability Evaluation System (DES) for his physical problems in November 2010.  The head injury in January 2011 was characterized as mild, and neuropsychological testing indicated intact cognitive functions.  Throughout his military career the applicant was able to pursue college courses, achieving good grades including following the head injury.  

6.  The SRP noted the neurologist and MH examiners concluded that his symptoms (personality change) were likely due to the early onset of Huntington’s disease; but these symptoms were not the reason he was referred into the DES and were judged to be mild and meeting retention standards (as a autosomal dominant condition with 100 percent penetrance, Huntington’s disease was not compensable under the rules of the military DES until a service member has 8 or more years of active duty service; Title 10, U.S. Code (10 USC) 1207a.).  The SRP agreed that the service treatment records reflected minimal occupational impairment (as related to mental functioning).

7.  After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP concluded the applicant’s mental condition was not unfitting at the time of separation.

8.  The available evidence shows the SRP’s assessment should be accepted. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 





are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.  




      __________X____________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20040003532



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                  AR20140014273



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010919

    Original file (20140010919.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP also determined that no MH diagnoses were changed to the applicant's possible disadvantage in the disability evaluation process. The evidence did not support a change in the diagnosis.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150010474

    Original file (20150010474.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted an application through the Department of Defense (DOD) Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP). The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The available records show that the diagnoses of mood disorder due to general medical condition (Huntington's Disease...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010846

    Original file (20140010846.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change to the applicant's disability and separation determination. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the pilot Disability Evaluation System (DES).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005644

    Original file (20150005644.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the applicant's MH condition during processing through the pilot disability evaluation system (DES). The TDRL re-evaluation examiner characterized his impairment as “deficiencies in most...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000940

    Original file (20140000940.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The applicant elaborated on a highly stressful incident (she witnessed the death of her boyfriend) that occurred while she was deployed to Iraq. The evidence in the DES record showed a diagnosis of depression.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010671

    Original file (20140010671.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of an MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP carefully considered all available evidence The applicant's MH diagnosis was changed during the Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) process, but none of the changes in diagnoses were to the applicant's possible disadvantage. The July 2011 examination...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018847

    Original file (20140018847.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. After a comprehensive review of the applicant’s case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change of the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014906

    Original file (20140014906.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of an MH diagnosis or diagnoses being changed or eliminated to the applicant's possible disadvantage during the Disability Evaluation Process (DES). After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000257

    Original file (20140000257.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After a comprehensive review of the applicant's case, the SRP determined by a vote of 2 to 1 that the applicant's unfitting condition diagnosis should be changed to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and that his permanent retirement should be modified to reflect a permanent 30-percent rating for his PTSD with a combined rating of 80 percent. The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the MH diagnoses; physical evaluation board (PEB) fitness determination; and if unfitting,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150010647

    Original file (20150010647.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the Disability Evaluation System (DES). ___________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the...